Can any one take up on answering the commie skum You Be Nailed (JUBE)

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Vietnamese American Society : One Thread

Jubinell = You are nailed an ignorant individual who khows nothing about VietNam and its bloodiest corrupted Communist Regime on earth greenspun.com : LUSENET : Vietnamese American Society : One Thread Moderator: vasgatekeeper@yahoo.com

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As we have seen in this forum a person under jubinell [ you be nailed ] hase made many remarks and comments of various posters on the Free VietNam subject. It appears that jubinell does not khow much about Viet Nam and the poor condition of living under tight controlled of a police state Regime in Viet Nam of normal vietnamese folks. I would invite him to come to Viet Nam and see normal folks who are living in the rural areas or in poor part of towns, the political dissidents, the imprisoned vietnameses to find out about their government before he post his comments here so we can have a common ground issues to debate or discuss intelligently. =======================================================================================================================================================

i love the way when it's all about me...yeah, i know your style, you associate every baddies with the government right? You start politically, then mix in some econs facts that's got nothing to do with communism, then you raise some stupid questions of morality that are even in doubt in western countries...then it all goes ablast: ontologically, sociologically, demographically, grammatically, enumenically, sometimes even sexually. Somehow, for every trivial argument of that sort which you win, there appears another bigger reason to stay dogged in your betrayal.

< Let set the fact straight here : Current Vietnam communist regime is the most oppressed regime in the world today. There are so many Vietnamese innocent people have been imprisoned by their own government because they spoke out against this regime. The only simple thing they asked is Freedom of speech, Freedom of religion right and asking the government and their KGB agents stop stealing money from the public funds that would be used to develop the infrastructure of Viet Nam economy. The current regime is also the most corrupted system, before opening your mouth think boy or you will be nailed for what you said that is untrue.> umm...dr. linguist, either you really know nothing of french, or you're an old-ass 60 years dude who sits and watch soap opera all day, take a pick!

umm, are you talking bout that one typo down the second line? No? And you know that "cowards" is actually english right? Then the apology is mine, Beside those i can't be any more picky.

Oh yeah but you ARE picky. Then maybe you might be interessed inn goin to0 wanadoo.fr chat rooms and see how "real" frenc peuple doe "realle" mistaks, d'accord? ki e tu? kelkun ki con prend tu e ki di tu, me c pukoi heh? jen sai pa, mai il nia okun ra por entr ca elex tintion du comunisme, ok? tu aim francai com ca mieu he? be, soine peu plu gentil, leche-kul Oh and by the way, before I sign off this forum, my exotic name has a pretty relevant meaning that i'd like to share with yall: Memory is a strange bell Jubilee and Knell -Emily D ~Once you've finished checking your little pocket dictionaries for those two ingredients you will indeed realize that Yes, we ARE a cursed race. We have no unity, and hitherto, your apparent lack thereof is far from reblessing it. =========================================================

You be nailed every single time boy jubinell >

PS : This forum is for Vietnamses who come to post their news and discussion of how to change Vietnam as a country under totalitarian comunist rule and one of the bloodiest , oppressed, corrupted regime onto a Democratic Viet Nam where the people can vote and select their officials based on the skill and ability to tun the government by the Rule of Law not by the rule of jungle as we have seen in VietNam today .

Cán Ngố Ãn Dải Dút ===============================================================

-- jubinell (frenchman@iknowfrench.com), September 26, 2004

-- (Cán_Ngố_Ãn-Dải-Dút@BBP.govt), September 26, 2004

Answers Oooff, haven't been here for 2 days and things have matured so quickly First off, nice!...why? thank you for such a compliment,

------ "I would invite him to come to Viet Nam and see normal folks who are living in the rural areas or in poor part of towns, the political dissidents, the imprisoned vietnameses to find out about their government before he post his comments here so we can have a common ground issues to debate or discuss intelligently."

-Umm, I have seen the normal folks. In fact, I am the normal folks. IN MORE FACTS, I LIVE IN VIETNAM YOU STUPID HOG "WHO CAN'T READ GOOD AND WANT TO DO OTHER THINGS GOOD TOO"!

I have been to the rural areas and poor part of towns. In fact, I WAS AT ONE POINT IN MY LIFE LIVING IN THE RURAL AREAS AND POOR PARTS OF TOWN. As of now, I still know people from those areas.

On another side of the same story, why don't you visit the poor parts of New York? Somebody should really clean up that filth.

As for the political dissidents, they deserve a wider spectrum of dicussion, which I will attempt to shed lights into separately. Meanwhile, I do have a life, unlike some of you who do no shit but clog up net-space. I beg your pardon there.

Just to get you started. The CIA have been assassinating numerous people on account of their being politically "un-American" for decades. How is this any better than the Vietnamese government (if at all) imprisoning the dissidents?

Like I said, that's just to get your started. I will talk more on that subject later.

-------- "PS : This forum is for Vietnamses who come to post their news and discussion of how to change Vietnam as a country under totalitarian comunist rule and one of the bloodiest , oppressed, corrupted regime onto a Democratic Viet Nam where the people can vote and select their officials based on the skill and ability to tun the government by the Rule of Law not by the rule of jungle as we have seen in VietNam today."

"This forum is for Vietnamses who come to post their news and discussion of how to change Vietnam as a country...onto a Democratic Viet Nam." Have you learned Coase's theorem? Changes will inititate when there's a need to. The people will revolt when there's a need to. Right now, it's just you and your big mouth.

You would have to believe me that Vietnam is far from being "one of the bloodiest , oppressed, corrupted regime..." You can see this empirically (if you have eyes that some times wander outside western newspapers). I think economics stats tell the biggest stories.

Also try visiting other countries, how about other developping countries, (once you've beat your taxes hard enough, of course). Once you've been to all 5 continents like me come back and talk.

"...onto a Democratic Viet Nam where the people can vote and select their officials based on the skill and ability to tun the government by the Rule of Law not by the rule of jungle as we have seen in VietNam today." I like the phrase "based on the skill and ability..." the most. Of course we see that happening with Bush Jr. Just because he's protecting the rights of the biggest farmers and agricultural producers against export competitions and taxes means that he should get elected again heh? Oh yeah of course, 99% of the senators are rich-ass people who has never seen poor. Is this the "un-jungle" law you're talking about? --------

Once again I would have felicitated you on your "apparent lack" of communication skills. So is the case with your ability to analyze what somebody writes.

-------- I would love to facilitate an "intelligent" discussion. But all you hogs seem to be doing is denounce, condemn, traduce and vilify the people/place that you've never met/been to.

-- Jube (jub@jub.jub), September 28, 2004.



-- (Foxtrott@Foxtrott.com), September 28, 2004

Answers

Humm, It takes that long for thid pig to answer his mail. I do not talk to trashy people alright, but I will point out yuo few Items that you commie pretends that you do not see or hear or or any moral foundation you moron or to be exact oxy moron .

1.- You khow nothing about Senator McArthy you commie skum, just hear says. McArthy was a good politician that his state voted him to repesent them throught a free election to speak for the normal folks on any issues that impacts their lives, economy so the Gove rnment would not make any studpid decision and McArthy was very good in making amendements and relevent matters to exclude leftist communists who tried to take over US in post WW II.

Incontrast, to Vietnamese communist like you who is taking a way the normal folk voice to speak out the Government who is a group of bandit who are hogging moneys from IMF and other Bank loans to fatten up theit pockets and contnued oppressing the normal folks., Your Congress is a phony one all the members were nominated to be the congess man to represent the bloody communist party instead of for the people. It only happened in a dictatorship where the servants of the people do not serve the people and take a way the free speech, freedom to be a people with dignity look at the prisons and political dissidents who are currently jailed for criticism of the current bloody communist regime that continue to oppressed people throught intimidation, jail, murdering to kêp people from being free . 3o years after the war the living conditions in Viet Nam is worst poverty level is very high, many new prisons are being built to keep people from critising the corrupted communist system.

2.- You are babling about the West Side and Harlem areas in the City of New York how worst it is in comparison with Viet Nam I mean you meant the whole Vietnam as a country is in a worst condition than the West Side and Harlem in NY. I want to open your eyes son so you can see. Mr Wallace is my long time friend he is older than me 20 some years who is black came from Harlem NY. He graduated with Civil engineer degree from Pen Sate in 1950 and he worked for Batchtel construction firm for many years I went with him on a business trip and visit his old sister still living in Harlem, Mr Wallace told me people in Harlem has their choice if they want to be better off than finish their education and going on to college or chơse the easy out is to skip school and join gangs. Mr Wallache chose the education as the ticket to leave the ghetto. Poor people in Vietnam has no choice to get out of the poverty why??? Because the Current communist government is a corrupted party who leave no choice for people except for themselves and the secret police like you and others who are the instruments to terrorize people and take away the Human Rights and basic nesessity to be a citizen. By the way those poor folks here in the USA who received the training to match their skill and finacially supported by the State and Federal public funds.

I have been to Vietnam many times and I know the living is worst every where in the country, people has no future and you a moron secret police of Vietnamese Communist party helping the band of thugs who are ruling Vietnam tday to keep people in a bottle so people won't revolve and over throw the communist thuggists. you are dead wrong , your governmnet days are number people will take back the country and return Vietnam to a Free Vietnam, a Democratic Vietnam and their dignity to be a normal folks and opportunity to get rich and having a goo living condition harssed free as soon as the Communism is gone.

-- (Cán_Ngố_Ãn-Dải-Dút@BBP.govt), September 28, 2004.


Blind man You be nailed ( JUBE JUBE JUBE ) now read the article below to learn more about Vietnam Political Dissidents and the Boody Thuggist Rules of Current Vietnamese Communist Bandit

********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* *********************

Recent Reports Support HRW About HRW Site Map

III. REPRESSION OF DISSIDENT VOICES The Vietnamese government tolerates little public criticism of the Communist Party or statements calling for pluralism, democratic reforms, or a free press.3 A common refrain by officials quoted in the state-controlled media is the need to rid the country of "hostile forces" and thwart "peaceful evolution" (a term used to deride those who allegedly seek to undermine or discredit communism by employing "Western" values of democracy and human rights). An example is the statement by CPV ideology chief Huu Tho in 1999: "Hostile forces from outside collaborate with bad, opportunistic elements from inside seeking to transform and derail socialism."4

Despite Vietnam's launching in 1986 of "doi moi," the economic renovation process, international donors to Vietnam remain frustrated with the slow rate of economic reform.5 Party leaders seem more intent on silencing dissent and retaining control, however, than addressing the economic and human rights concerns raised by donors or by Vietnamese dissidents and rural farmers brave enough to speak out. Indicating the mindset of the conservatives in power, in February 2000 Party General Secretary Le Kha Phieu denounced "imperialism" for widening the gap between rich and poor countries and stated: "We are renovating, but we are determined not to change color. The difficulties and challenges will not force us to diverge from the path of socialism."6 Vietnam's economic reform program has slowed not only because of the Asian economic crisis but also because of splits within the Communist Party's leadership, which is clearly uncertain as to how far it should open up the country to the West. The nineteen-member Politburo has been unable to reach consensus on such key issues as whether to move forward with a trade agreement with the U.S that has been stalled since July 1999. The Politburo has been paralyzed by the divide between those who advocate economic reforms along the lines proposed by the international donors and those who favor a more conservative and ideological approach, which is less threatening to their own assets as well as their political interests. There is concern that economic reform will jeopardize the positionof state-owned enterprises which will find it more difficult to compete with foreign companies. Political hardliners also fear that proposed economic reforms could weaken the Party's control at a time when it faces increasing rural unrest due to corruption and the widening economic gap between rural and urban dwellers.

Corruption remains a serious and widespread problem and has been repeatedly raised as an obstacle to development by the World Bank and Vietnam's bilateral donors. In response, the government has taken various actions, including highly publicized purges of allegedly corrupt officials, but these have so far failed to convince either domestic or international critics of the government's sincerity. In early 1999 the Communist Party discussed the need for a "self-criticism campaign" to root out corruption and, in May 1999, CPV Secretary General Le Kha Phieu ordered the anti- graft campaign to begin in earnest. The same month, the country's largest corruption trial, the Minh Phung-Epco trial, began in Ho Chi Minh City against defendants accused of defrauding the government of VND 5,186 billion (approximately U.S. $350 million). This concluded in August 1999, with the conviction of seventy-seven defendants, four sentenced to death.

The corruption purges continued and affected senior officials in the hierarchy, several of whom were dismissed in November 1999 for mismanagement, including Deputy Prime Minister Ngo Xuan Loc, former central bank governor Cao Sy Kien, and former customs chief Phan Van Dinh. Another 1,500 officials have been suspended or disciplined since the anti-corruption campaign began.7

Many of the top leaders targeted in the purges, however, were allied with those advocating economic reforms, such as Premier Phan Van Khai. Most hardline conservatives within the Party have been largely unaffected and appear virtually unaccountable. The sincerity of the anti-corruption campaign was questioned in a January 2000 article in the Sai Gon Gia Phong newspaper, which reported that only a small fraction of the Party's membership had been affected by the purge.8 Fears have also been expressed that those who speak out against corrupt officials as part of the anti-graft campaign may later come under attack and be labeled as dissidents themselves.

From 1975 until the late 1990s, many of those who opposed or criticized the government or called for pluralism and democratic reforms were imprisoned or sent to re-education camps. Nowadays, however, the Vietnamese government appears keen to avoid the international opprobrium that such overt repression provokes and to prefer to use other, less obvious means to try and silence key political and religious dissidents. Those who go too far in criticizing or confronting the government, however, still risk being subjected to house arrest, administrative detention or prison sentences.

It remains extremely difficult to estimate the number of those currently imprisoned in Vietnam because of their political or religious beliefs. The government rarely discloses information about them and does not allow independent monitoring of its prisons. However, Colonel Do Nam, director of the Public Security Ministry's Prisons Management Department, stated in March, 2000 that Vietnam's prison population included more than one hundred people convicted of crimes against national security alone.9 This figure could include many people imprisoned for their political orreligious beliefs, while other such prisoners may also be serving sentences imposed under different laws. According to Col. Nam, 78,000 people were then imprisoned in Vietnam, including 70,000 in forty-eight prisons under the Public Security Ministry, 7,000 in provincial detention camps, and 1,000 in Ministry of Defense Prisons.10 While as many as seven thousand prisoners were expected to be released in the amnesty scheduled for April 30, at the time this report was prepared, it was unclear whether these would include political prisoners, and, if so, how many. Previous amnesties, which have mostly resulted in the release of ordinary criminal prisoners, suggested it would be unlikely that a significant number of political prisoners would be among those freed.

Monitoring of Former Political Prisoners

Under Article 30 of Vietnam's criminal code, people convicted of national security offenses can be placed under the supervision and surveillance of local authorities for a probationary period of up to five years after release from prison. Formerly imprisoned political dissidents and re-education camp inmates, including religious dissidents, appear to be routinely subjected to such monitoring.

Many former political prisoners, particularly those who attempt to speak out, are regularly summoned for questioning by police or local officials. Their publishing rights are denied, friends and neighbors are discouraged from meeting them, their mail is intercepted, and their telephone lines are blocked. Others are forced into retirement or lose their positions in the government. Many have been denied household registry documents, which are required not only to legally reside in one's home, but to lawfully hold a job, attend a state school, receive public health care, travel, vote, or formally challenge administrative abuses. Among the political prisoners released in 1998 who were denied these residence permits were Dr. Nguyen Dan Que, Thich Quang Do, Thich Tue Sy, and Thich Khong Tanh. Thich Nhat Ban, a Buddhist monk released in October 1998, commented that he has been released from a "small prison only to enter a larger one."

Dr. Nguyen Dan Que, a leading dissident, has lived under close and constant surveillance since his release from prison in 1998. Police officers regularly visit his house, particularly when he has visitors. An endocrinologist and the first Amnesty International member in Vietnam, Dr. Que has spent much of the last twenty years in prison. His most recent period of imprisonment began when he was arrested in June 1990 after making a public appeal for political pluralism and respect for human rights; he was then held in Xuan Loc labor camp in Dong Nai province. When he was released from prison in 1998, he decided to remain in Ho Chi Minh City rather than leave the country. Yet, he remains unable to work because the authorities have not restored his license to practice as a medical doctor, and he is unable to travel because he has not been issued a residence permit. His neighbors and friends are regularly warned by the authorities to stay away from him, further isolating him. His telephone connection has been blocked and his Internet account suspended since May 1999, when he issued a communiqué by E-mail calling for democratic reforms. Despite this constant harassment, Que still manages to make public statements from time to time.

Stifling Dissent from within the Party

Government authorities are particularly sensitive to opposition from within the Vietnamese Communist Party, which ranges from those who completely reject Communism, to those who wish to retain a socialist system but seek to reform the Party from within, to those who criticize the Party primarily because they are frustrated with its endemic corruption.

A highly respected retired general and former chief of the Communist Party Ideology and Culture Committee, Tran Do was expelled from the Party in January 1999 because of his open criticism of it. He is now largely off limits to foreign press and diplomats. Since his expulsion, his phone line has been monitored and the connection often cut. In addition, his house has been placed under surveillance by undercover security police, who also follow him when he leaves it. In April 1999, the government turned down a request by Tran Do to be allowed to publish a privatenewspaper (See Appendix 1, Tran Do's application to publish a newspaper and the response from the Ministry of Culture and Information).

Tran Do has issued periodic critiques of the Party since 1995, but from 1998 they became much more pointed, and he issued a series of open letters to the Party leadership challenging its concentration of power and calling for democratic reforms and freedom of expression.

Popular novelist Duong Thu Huong, detained in 1991 for seven months for "sending seditious documents abroad" (that is, the manuscript for her novel) is also considered a threat because of her connections to the Party and the fact that several of her novels, which are critical of the government, have been translated into English and widely sold abroad. The authorities have refused to issue her a passport, making it impossible for her to travel abroad to attend international writers' conferences to which she has been invited.

Nguyen Ho, a former prominent Party member, war hero, and founder of the Club of Former Resistance Fighters, has also called publicly for greater democracy and the need to expose abuses within the Party. Since February 1996, he has been held under unofficial house arrest: police are stationed at his house to bar all visitors. Like other dissidents his telephone line is cut. He was previously held under house arrest from September 1990 to May 1993, and again since February 1996.

Hoang Minh Chinh, a former high-ranking Party cadre and former director of the Marxist-Leninist Institute, was detained in Hanoi in 1995 for allegedly propagating "anti-socialist propaganda." This was the third time he had been detained for criticizing Party policy. Today, he remains under heavy surveillance in Hanoi, with his telephone line jammed when he receives international calls.

After Tran Do's expulsion from the Party, other senior Party members and war heroes such as Col. Pham Que Duong and Hoang Huu Nhan made public statements in support of Tran Do. The Party Central Committee then passed a resolution in February 1999 stating that it would punish or criticize those who disseminate their own opinions or distribute dissenting views.11 Broadcast on national radio, the CPV Central Committee resolution stated, in part, that:

Party committees at all levels should monitor the political and ideological awareness developments of Party officials and members, regularly provide information to and assist one another in order to create consensus on the Party's viewpoints and line; correct improper viewpoints in a timely manner; strictly criticize and punish those Party members who have infringed the organizational principles of the Party who after being assisted by the Party organization keep disseminating their own opinions or distributing documents contrary to the platform, the statute and the resolutions of the Party.12

In a further effort to thwart opposition from within the Party, in May 1999, Politburo member Pham The Duyet outlined more than a dozen activities outlawed for Party members, including issuing statements contrary to the Party platform, and organizing people to lodge complaints or join demonstrations.13

Silencing Critical Poets and Intellectuals

Also under pressure and scrutiny are outspoken critics of the government from the academic and intellectual communities. Included in this group are mathematician Phan Dinh Dieu, geologist Nguyen Thanh Giang, journalist Vu Huy Cuong, writer Hoang Tieng, and the so- called Dalat intellectuals - biologist and writer Ha Si Phu, poet Bui Minh Quoc, and writer Tieu Dao Bao Cu. Intellectuals are highly respected in Vietnamese society, so statements they make or books or poetry they write are accorded considerable status and receive careful attention. Many have previously been jailed or placed under house arrest or administrative detention for expressing views critical of the government.

Geologist Nguyen Thanh Giang, who has openly advocated human rights, multiparty democracy, and peaceful reforms, was detained by police for three days in March 1998 and then released only after going on hunger strike. A month later he was summoned to the Cultural Police Headquarters and advised to stop criticizing the Party's polices. Then, on March 4, 1999, he was arrested and charged under Article 205a of the Criminal Code for "abusing democratic rights." After widespread international protest Giang was released in May 1999. He continues to be required to report regularly to police and prohibited from traveling outside his local neighborhood in Hanoi without permission. Public security police have searched Giang's house on several occasions, such as in October 1999, when they confiscated his computer and ordered him to the police station for several days of interrogation (See Appendix 2, Letter of Protest to the Government from Nguyen Thanh Giang). Giang has issued a number of public letters over the years, denouncing "red capitalists" within the Communist Party and violations of human rights, and calling for "real democracy in which people from both the top and the bottom would equally benefit."

After dissident journalist Vu Huy Cuong wrote a letter in January 1999 supporting Tran Do he was called in for interrogation by the police. Vu Huy Cuong has been a long-time government critic. For most of the last thirty years he has either been in prison or under constant police surveillance. After opposing the Party's Maoist stance in the early 1960s, Cuong was fired from newspapers where he worked, was imprisoned in 1967, and then was exiled to Ha Nam Ninh province from 1973-78. He has been banned from publishing or taking jobs with the government or as a teacher since 1980.

In April 1999, police summoned writer Hoang Tien and Vu Huy Cuong for questioning in conjunction with Nguyen Thanh Giang's arrest. During April alone Hoang Tien underwent seven interrogation sessions, from April 12-14 and again on April 20; Vu Huy Cuong's interrogations began on April 12 and continued on a daily basis for several days. In late 1999 the police were continuing to visit Vu Huy Cuong almost every day. Hoang Tien is a well known writer who has been an outspoken advocate for democracy, freedom of speech, and freedom of the press. He issued his own reports during the 1996 trial of dissident Ha Si Phu, when he protested that the Vietnamese press was not allowed to cover the arrest and trial but instead "could only offer brief bits of news according to what the authorities handed down."

Writer Tieu Dao Bao Cu and poet Bui Minh Quoc were each placed under house arrest for two years in their homes in Dalat under Administrative Detention Directive 31/CP (see section III below). The official detention period lasted from September 1997 through October 1999. The authorities continue to keep them under surveillance, however, and their telephones are disconnected, although Bui Minh Quoc has been able to travel in the North since his release from detention.

Bui Minh Quoc was originally arrested in 1997 on the grounds of being in possession of "reactionary literature"- in fact, fellow dissident Vu Thu Hien's novel, Darkness at Midday. The arrest, made at a Dalat bus stop, took place on his return from a visit to Ho Chi Minh City. His conditions and treatment worsened in May 1998, following the appearance in Vietnam and elsewhere of his work, Poetic Flashes in the Interrogation Chamber. At that time he was subjected to intensive questioning and his home was ransacked by public security officials, who took away further reading and writing materials.

While under administrative detention, Bui Minh Quoc was made to live in near total isolation. Police were posted outside his home and generally he could not venture further than the confines of his house and garden. His telephone line was disconnected by the security authorities several months prior to his being placed under house arrest in order to prevent him from contacting people outside Vietnam or giving interviews to western news media. All mail to and from Quoc was intercepted. Money sent by relatives did not reach him. His home was searched by public security officials on several occasions during which books and writing materials were confiscated. On several occasions Quoc was subject to questioning and interrogation, usually of a very tedious and repetitive nature. Written requests he submitted to the police to take his son to school were rejected. His wife, a former journalist at the state- operated television and broadcasting station in Dalat, had to quit her job because of the circumstances surrounding her husband's arrest. Consequently, the family was deprived of their normal means of income, and turned to making and selling small hand-puppets to earn a living.

Biologist and writer Ha Si Phu was arrested in December 1995 and charged with "revealing state secrets" for being in possession of a copy of Prime Minister Vo Van Kiet's letter to the Politburo calling for reforms. After trial in August 1996, he was imprisoned until December 1996. He was then placed under house arrest on an unofficial basis when he returned to his home in Dalat. Ha Si Phu was treated even more harshly than the two other dissidents in Dalat, Bui Minh Quoc and Bao Cuu. In April 1999 police searched Ha Si Phu's house, confiscated his computer, printer, and diskettes, and fined him 500,000 Vietnam dong (about US $35) for violating the "publishing law." This incident reportedly was spurred by Ha Si Phu writing a letter to Tran Do, congratulating him for being expelled from the CPV. Ha Si Phu's condition of informal house arrest remains in place.

Controlling Rural Unrest

Not only urban or intellectual dissidents, but also farmers in the countryside, who constitute the majority of Vietnam's population, are denied their fundamental rights to free assembly, expression, and association. Isolated incidents of peasant protest in the provinces have occurred since the late 1980s, and farmers occasionally gather before sessions of the National Assembly in Hanoi to lodge complaints. However, under Vietnam's laws, farmers may be sanctioned if they publicly air their grievances or try to form independent associations to represent their interests.

In 1997 serious rural unrest erupted in Dong Nai and Thai Binh provinces, sparked by farmers' economic grievances and protests against corruption by local officials. In Thai Binh, some of the demonstrations turned violent, leading the government to dispatch more than 1200 special police as well as a high-level delegation led by Politburo member Pham The Duyet. More than fifty police and provincial officials were arrested at the time, as were more than sixty protestors, most of whom were probably detained under Administrative Detention Decree 31/CP. The media was prevented from traveling to the areas for more than five months; journalists still are not able to travel freely in the districts where the protests occurred. In March 1998, at least nine local people were convicted for disturbing public order during the January clashes in Dong Nai. In July 1998, the People's Court in Thai Binh sentenced more than thirty local people, whom the government termed "extremists," to prison terms: they were said to have incited people to disrupt public order during the unrest in the province in 1997. In Thai Binh more than 1500 local officials were eventually disciplined for corruption and because of ongoing unrest, eighty-four party members were expelled, and thirty local officials or cadres were sentenced to prison terms.

Despite this clampdown, reports of sporadic protests by local farmers and disgruntled local officials who lost their jobs continue to be received. It remains difficult to monitor the extent of rural unrest because of restrictions on travel by foreign journalists, but since 1997 peasant protests have been reported not only in Thai Binh but also in southern Dong Nai province, where farmers protested evictions by the military; Ha Tay Province near Hanoi, the site of ongoing dissatisfaction over land rights and corruption; as well as Ha Nam, Nam Dinh, Thanh Hoa, Quang Ngai, and Bac Ninh provinces. The government's harsh response to the rural unrest makes clear both its determination tomaintain stability and the general absence in Vietnam of basic protections for the individual against arbitrary detention and violations of rights to expression, association and assembly.14

Persecution of Religious Dissidents

Religious groups and churches that are not officially sanctioned or controlled by the government continue to be perceived as posing a challenge to government authority because of their potential for attracting large followings and thus, for competing with the Party's mass organizations. A 1998 report by Abdelfattah Amor, the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance, underscored the need for Vietnam to implement reforms to safeguard religious freedoms. However, the government continues to require that all religious activities be registered by the state, to restrict travel by religious leaders, and to censor the contents of their sermons and speeches.

In April 1999, the government issued a new decree on religion, No. 26/1999/ND-CP.15 While purporting to guarantee freedom of religion, the decree provides that all religious organizations "used to oppose the State of the Socialist Republic of Vietnam," as well as undefined "superstitious activities," are to be punished.16 The decree provides for extensive government regulation of religious organizations, and includes provisions that religious seminaries and appointments of religious leaders be approved by the government.17 The decree also bans religious organizations that conduct activities contrary to "structures authorized by the prime minister."18 These provisions appear to be directed against religious leaders who have taken critical stands against the government and called for peaceful democratic reforms.

Religious leaders from the banned Unified Church of Vietnam (UBCV) face ongoing persecution for their long history of confronting the country's rulers on matters of principle. The UBCV was the main Buddhist organization in south and central Vietnam prior to 1975, when administration of its properties and institutions were taken over by the government.19 In 1981 the UBCV was dissolved by the government and replaced with the state-sponsored Vietnam Buddhist Church. Since that time tensions have risen steadily between the government and the UBCV, which does not recognize the authority of the Vietnam Buddhist Church, particularly during the 1990s when the government imprisoned many monks affiliated with the UBCV.

The Supreme Patriarch of the UBCV, Thich Huyen Quang, eighty-one, is currently being detained without trial under pagoda arrest in Nghia Hanh district in Quang Ngai province. He was first arrested in April 1977, then again in 1982 for calling for official recognition of the UBCV. From his forced internal exile in central Quang Ngai province, he issued a declaration in November 1993 calling for democratic reform and respect for human rights. In December 1994 he was rearrested on charges of organizing a UBCV flood relief operation in the Mekong Delta. In January 1995, police forcibly moved Thich Huyen Quang to an isolated pagoda in Quang Ngai province, where he now lives in internal exile. While requests by journalists, diplomats and non-governmental organizations to visit Thich HuyenQuang are routinely rejected by the government, in December 1999 a U.S. Embassy official was able to meet with him for three hours while inspecting flood-stricken areas in Quang Nai.

Outspoken UBCV leader Thich Quang Do has been harassed by the authorities on several occasions since his latest release from prison in September 1998. In March 1999, he was summoned for questioning and ordered to return to Ho Chi Minh City after he traveled to central Vietnam to visit Thich Huyen Quang. On August 6, officials in Ho Chi Minh City called in Thich Quang Do to interrogate him and tried to force him to sign a confession that he had acted illegally in July when he wrote a letter to European Union ambassadors in Hanoi calling for human rights and religious freedoms. On August 13, a police squad came to his pagoda after midnight and demanded to see him, threatening to break down the door before they eventually left.

In September 1999, Thich Quang Do was again summoned several times for questioning by police, as were UBCV monks Thich Khong Tanh and Thich Tue Sy, who had also been released from prison in 1998. The monks were told that their rearrests were imminent, as warrants had already been prepared to arrest them for "subversive activities" pending further investigation. During a tense, three-hour interrogation session on September 6, Thich Quang Do was confronted by ten officials, including members of the Ho Chi Minh City police, the Ho Chi Minh City section of the CPV, the Fatherland Front, and the official Vietnam Buddhist Church. On October 29, security police surrounded the Lien Tri Pagoda of Thich Khong Tanh in Ho Chi Minh City and confiscated documents and a fax machine.

Members of the Hoa Hao sect of Buddhism have been subject to police surveillance and several are thought to remain in detention. The sect was granted official status in May 1999, although government appointees dominate an eleven-member Hoa Hao Buddhism Representative Committee established at that time. In July 1999, in one of the first large public gatherings of the group since 1975, thousands of Hoa Hao members commemorated the founding of the church in An Giang province. Because of its history of armed resistance to Communist forces before 1975, however, the Hoa Hao sect remains closely monitored. After Hoa Hao Elder Le Quang Liem signed a joint appeal in September 1999 with representatives of other religions calling for greater religious freedom (see page 14, below), he was interrogated on several occasions by Ho Chi Minh City Public Security Police. Since December 1999 his telephone line has been disconnected and his house placed under surveillance.

On several occasions in December 1999 Hoa Hao members in An Giang province reportedly clashed with police, who prevented them from hanging out religious signs and pictures of their prophet and blocked their pilgrimage to their prophet's birthplace. Police also reportedly detained and beat some of the Hoa Hao adherents, only releasing them after about one hundred demonstrators staged a vigil at the police station.20 Tensions increased in An Giang province in the lead-up to a Hoa Hao religious anniversary commemorating the assassination of their founder on March 30, 2000. On March 11, police reportedly raided a private Hoa Hao ceremony in An Giang, injuring several participants and arresting three others. On March 28, two Hoa Hao Buddhists were reportedly arrested in An Giang province and charged with "defaming the government." On March 30 police reportedly blocked thousands of Hoa Hao followers from observing the religious anniversary, detaining ten followers.21

Members of the Cao Dai religion, which combines elements of Confucianism, Christianity, Taoism and Buddhism, have complained that some of their religious practices are banned and church property has been confiscated. A 1997 CPV report for Tay Ninh province, where Cao Daism is based, stated that the Cao Dai cathedral was a place"where enemies take advantage to stir up political reactionary operations against our revolution...We all agreed to fade out Spiritualism; to wipe out the [Cao Dai] system, which was organized like a state within a state."22

In October, 1998 two Cao Daists, Le Kim Bien and Pham Cong Hien, were arrested in Kien Giang province and sentenced to two years' imprisonment after they attempted to meet with U.N. Special Rapporteur Amor during his visit to Vietnam. While the religion was officially recognized in 1997, this was done on the government's terms, with the Cao Dai placed under a government-appointed management council that is not recognized by many Cao Dai officials. Special Rapporteur Amor noted in his 1998 report: "Two distinct groups are now associated with Cao Daism: a management committee, comprising a few church officials controlled by the authorities, and a majority of independent church officials opposed to the Committee."23

The government has also made efforts to suppress Protestants through police raids, surveillance, and negative propaganda, particularly as increasing numbers of ethnic minorities have joined evangelical churches in the northern and central highlands.24 Reports have been received of persecution and harassment of Hmong Protestants in Lai Chau, Lao Cai and Ha Giang provinces, Mnong in Binh Phuoc province, Bahnar and Jarai in Gia Lai province, and Hre in Quang Ngai. Three Protestant churches in Binh Phuoc province, whose members were ethnic Mnong and Stieng, were demolished by provincial authorities in July 1999. Subsequently several provincial officials were dismissed in Binh Phuoc leading to a decrease in tensions with local Protestants.

In January 1999, an official law journal, Phap Luat, heavily criticized the conversion to Protestantism of Hmong in northern Ha Giang province. The provincial Party chief was quoted as saying that a district task force had been established to "deal with illegal religious evangelism" by persuading people to sign commitments not to follow "bad people" or cults, but to rebuild ancestor shrines.25 Two months earlier in the same province, the provincial propaganda committee issued a forty-two page pamphlet entitled "Propagandizing and Mobilizing Citizens not to Follow Religion Illegally." About ten Hmong Christians were reportedly in detention in Lai Chau and Ha Giang provinces as of late-1999.

On May 7, 1999, police raided an evangelical gathering of the Vietnam Assemblies of God Church in a Hanoi hotel and held twenty people for several days. Police detained two of the group's leaders, Lo Van Hen (a member of the Black Thai minority group, who had been released from three years in prison in January 1999), and Rev. Tran Dinh (Paul) AI, who had served two years in prison in the early 1990s for his religious activities and who had met with U.N. Special Rapporteur Amor during his 1998 visit. Lo Van Hen was escorted back to his home in Dien Bien Phu, while Rev. AI was detained under police guard for a month in the Hanoi hotel where the meeting had taken place.26 Subsequent police raids on Christian gatherings, in which police temporarily detained church members, were reportedto have taken place in 1999: in Quang Nam province in September, in Viet Tri town on October 10, and in Halong Bay in mid-October.27

Members of Tin Lanh (Good News, or Gospel) Protestant churches who are lowland Vietnamese [Kinh] are often less persecuted. This is thought to be because their members are not members of ethnic minorities and many of their churches are located in the main cities of Danang, Hanoi, and Ho Chi Minh City rather than in remote highland areas. There are approximately 300 Tin Lanh churches in Vietnam, fifteen of which are the only Protestant churches that the government officially recognizes.28

For Catholics, relations between Vietnam and the Vatican warmed slightly in 1999 with the visit in March of a Vatican delegation and Vietnam's acceptance of the appointment of four new bishops by the Vatican. As in 1998, tens of thousands of Catholics were able to attend an annual festival commemorating the sanctuary of the Notre Dame of La Vang in Quang Tri province. However, at least seven members of the Catholic Congregation of the Mother Co-Redemptrix, arrested in 1987, were believed to remain in prison as of this writing. In northern Son La province police have reportedly harassed ethnic minority Hmong Catholics in Hung Hoa diocese, where the government has rejected nominations for a bishop. The Vietnamese government has turned down requests by Catholics for the Pope to visit Vietnam.

Father Chan Tin, a Redemptorist priest in Ho Chi Minh City, has been a long-time critic of the regime. He was held under house arrest between 1990 and 1993. In 1998 while travelling to attend the funeral of a Communist Party Veteran who had called for democratization, Father Chan Tin and former Catholic priest Nguyen Ngoc Lan were injured in a motorcycle accident when another motorcyclist kicked the front of their motorcycle. This occurred in the presence of several police officers, none of whom took any action, but it remains unclear whether this was an attempt to kill or intimidate the two priests or simply an accident.

In September 1999 members of four of the main religions in Vietnam issued an unprecedented statement calling for the repeal of the new religion decree, described above, and demanding religious freedom and the separation of church and state. The letter, which was sent to CPV officials, was signed by Thich Quang Do of the UBCV, Catholic priest Chan Tin, Cao Dai priest Tran Quang Chau, and Hoa Hao leader Le Quang Liem.29 Afterwards, Le Quang Liem was questioned several times by Ho Chi Minh City Public Security Police about signing the joint appeal and his house was placed under surveillance. Police also summoned Thich Quang Do for questioning several times during the month of September.

3 The information in this report is based on interviews with individuals in Vietnam, France, and the United States, supplemented by academic articles, news stories, and reports by the U.N., non- governmental organizations, and diplomatic sources on human rights conditions in Vietnam. 4 Associated Press, "Prominent Vietnamese Dissident Arrested; Rights Grps Protest," March 11, 1999. 5 At the last two Consultative Group (CG) meetings of Vietnam's donors, held annually, the World Bank, International Monetary Fund and other donors pressed Vietnam to tackle corruption, institute greater transparency, and launch economic reforms. At the December 1999 CG meeting, donors pledged U.S. $2.8 billion in aid to Vietnam, with $700 million conditioned on accelerated economic reforms. Leading officials of donor governments have also raised human rights concerns in 1999, notably U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright during her visit to Vietnam; Finnish Prime Minister Paavo Lipponen, when Finland held the European Union chairmanship; and Czech Prime Minister Milos Zeman, who raised issues of democratization and political prisoners during a visit to Hanoi. See Associated Press, "Albright, Vietnamese Leaders Meet," September 6, 1999; Adam Jasser, "Vietnam PM calls for more trade talks with U.S.," Reuters, September 23, 1999 (coverage of PM's visit to Finland); and Pavla Novakova, "Zeman Did Not Sidestep Human Rights Issue in Vietnam," in Prague Lidove Noviny in Czech, December 16, 1999, cited in FBIS-EEU- 1999-1216. 6 Associated Press, "Vietnam Party Lambasts Imperialism," February 2, 2000. 7 Huw Watkin, "Fear rather than reform may be behind purge," South China Morning Post, November 13, 1999. 8 See Huw Watkin, "Corrupt cadres thrive despite graft campaign," South China Morning Post, January 11, 2000. 9 The Working Group on Arbitrary Detention noted that Article 73 of the Penal Code, in describing offenses against national security, makes no distinction between the use or non-use of violence or of incitement or non-incitement to violence. The Working Group's 1994 report states: "The present wording of article 73 is so vague that it could result in penalties being imposed not only on persons using violence for political ends, but also on persons who have merely exercised their legitimate right to freedom of opinion or expression." See "Question of the Human Rights of All Persons Subjected to any Form of Detention or Imprisonment; Working Group on Arbitrary Detention, Visit to Viet Nam," Commission on Human Rights, December 21, 1994, E/CN.4/1995/31/Add.4. 10 Associated Press, "18,000 Inmates to be Considered for Amnesty," March 11, 2000. 11 The resolution sends a mixed message, stating on the one hand that the Party will not discriminate against those with "minority views," but vowing to punish those who disseminate "dissenting views."

12 Voice of Vietnam, Hanoi, (radio) in Vietnamese, February 24, 1999, BBC Worldwide Monitoring; Reuters, "Vietnam communist Party to clamp down on dissent," February 25, 1999.

13 Hanoi Lao Dong, "Labor Journal Reviews SRV Party's `Forbidden' Activities,'" June 11, 1999; see also Associated Press, "Vietnam Clamps Down on Free Speech," June 7, 1999.

14 See Human Rights Watch/Asia, "Vietnam: Rural Unrest in Vietnam," Vol. 9, No. 11 (C), December 1997.

15 Decree No. 26/1999/ND-CP, "Decree of the Government Concerning Religious Activities" (translation on file at Human Rights Watch).

16 Ibid., articles 5; see also article 7.

17 Ibid., articles 18-26.

18 Ibid., article 8.

19 The 1963 demonstrations and self-immolations to protest the policies of the Diem government in South Vietnam led the majority of Buddhist sects in southern and central Vietnam to join together in a loose association known as the Unified Buddhist Church. It later became the largest Buddhist organization in this overwhelmingly Buddhist country.

20 Deutsche Presse-Agentur, December 30, 1999.

21 Deutsche Presse-Agentur, "Vietnam police block key anniversary of troubled Buddhist sect," March 30, 2000.

22 Andy Soloman, "Cao Dai struggles for survival in Vietnam," Reuters, April 21, 1999.

23 Commission on Human Rights, "Civil and Political Rights, Including the Question of Religious Intolerance; Addendum: Visit to Vietnam," Report submitted by Abdelfattah Amor, December 12, 1998.

24 Protestantism is the fastest growing religion in Vietnam, with a four-fold increase in membership since 1975 to an estimated 600,000 to 800,000 adherents of the faith today.

25 "Combating the Illegal Propagation of Religion - Not Only Promoting Law and Order," Phap Luat (Law), January 15, 1999. See also World Evangelical Fellowship, "On the Cruel Edges of the World: the Untold Persecution of Christians Among Vietnam's Minority Peoples," March 1999.

26 Reuters, "Vietnam Police Bust Hanoi Bible Meet, Detain 20," May 14, 1999. Reuters, "Prominent Vietnam Pastor Released from Detention," June 4, 1999.

27 Dean Yates, "Vietnam Christians decry police raids, harassment," Reuters, October 28, 1999.

28 1999 Vietnam Country Report on Human Rights Practices, released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, U.S. Department of State, February 25, 2000.

29 Deutsche Press-Agentur, "Vietnam's Major Religions Make Unprecedented Joint Freedom Appeal," September 27, 1999.



-- (Cán_Ngố_Ãn-Dải-Dút@BBP.govt), September 28, 2004.


You Oxy Moron Idiot JUBE, Read and learn why Vietnamese oversea and the free world ( Democratic Nations ) think about Vietnam and the fate of the Free Press is one of a basic right to hold the Governtmnet accountable for their action is non existance in Vietnam tiday. WHat a shame and you must be ashamed if you still has some human decency.

********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* ******************

Recent Reports Support HRW About HRW Site Map

IV. RESTRICTIONS ON FREEDOM OF THE PRESS The Vietnamese press is no longer the "monolithic propaganda machine" it once was, and dozens of lively new publications have sprung up in recent years.30 Most of the new publications, however, focus on sports, entertainment, or sensational news from police blotters, and provide little check on the government. The media continues to remain under strict government control although journalists are able occasionally to report on corruption by government officials. Direct criticism of the Party, however, is clearly forbidden.

With the political content of state media tightly regulated, dissidents and critics of the government have few avenues of expression. The 1993 Publishing Law does not permit private ownership of media or publishing houses. Instead all publishing operations must belong either to state agencies or to officially sanctioned social or political organizations.31 None of the criticism of the government by dissidents, senior Party leaders, or retired officers is published in the state media. In addition, press coverage of hot spots such as Thai Binh and Dong Nai, sites of peasant demonstrations over the last couple of years, was blacked out for more than four months in 1997; access to those areas has been strictly controlled since then.

Passed by the National Assembly in July 1993, the Publishing Law authorizes pre-publication censorship "in necessary circumstances decided by the Prime Minister"32 and bans the following:

C Material detrimental to the Socialist Republic of Vietnam or the unity of its entire people;

C Material inciting violence or war or aggression, fomenting hatred among nationalities, and peoples of various nations, propagating reactionary concepts and culture, disseminating degenerate or decadent lifestyle; promoting crime, social vice and superstition; and damaging good Vietnamese morals and customs;

C Material revealing party, state, military, national security, economic and foreign affairs secrets; secrets involving the personal lives of citizens; and other secrets stipulated by law;

C Material distorting history, rejecting revolutionary achievements, discrediting great Vietnamese men and national heroes, or slandering and damaging the prestige of organizations or the dignity of citizens.33

Critics such as Hoang Minh Chinh have been charged under Article 82 of the Criminal Code with propagating "anti-socialist propaganda."34 When the journal published by Nguyen Ho's Club of Former Resistance Fighters criticized the Party in 1989, especially its treatment of war veterans, the government promptly shut down both the publication and the association. In a stern reminder to journalists not to exceed state-imposed limits, Communist Party member Nguyen Hoang Linh, who had reported on high-level corruption within the General Department of Customs, was dismissed as editor of Doanh Nghiep (Enterprise) newspaper in 1997. Immediately after Nguyen's arrest, the Politburo issued a directive on October 23, 1997 ordering the press to adhere to the party line and warning all others not to "reveal state secrets." In 1998, Nguyen was tried and found guilty for "taking advantage of democracy to damage the state" and sentenced to time served of a little more than one year.

Requests by dissidents to publish journals have either been rejected or ignored. In July 1999 the Ministry of Culture and Information rejected a request by Tran Do to publish a newspaper (Appendix 1 contains a translation of Tran Do's lengthy, carefully articulated request for a permit, as well as a translation of the government's letter of denial). As of this writing the government had not responded to an application to publish a journal made by Thich Quang Do in September 1999.

The role of the media, as outlined by the official army daily, Hanoi Quan Doi Nhan Dan, is to combat "reactionary forces." In a January 1999 article, the paper asserted that:

At the national level, the press needs to be quick and sharp in countering malicious arguments and misinformation about the situation in Vietnam produced by hostile forces. The press should actively participate in breaking up and criticizing reactionary and counter-revolutionary viewpoints of bad, reactionary, and opportunistic elements both at home and abroad.35

In May 1999 the National Assembly passed a new press law which makes the Ministry of Culture and Information responsible for all media outlets and the Internet.36 The new law, which applies only to Vietnamese press and not foreign media outlets, requires journalists to pay compensation or publish retractions to individuals harmed by their reports. Retractions are required not only for inaccurate stories, but for writings which "violat[e] the honour of any organization or the dignity of any individual."37 The vague language of the law, which fails to define clearly what is and is not prohibited, is likely to lead editors to err on the side of caution. Coupled with the 1998 conviction of editor Nguyen Hoang Linh, described above, this measure likely will increase further the already significant degree of press self-censorship, leading the media to back away from reporting on corruption or other scandals involving officials.

Surprisingly, aspects of the new law even drew criticism initially from certain Vietnamese state media. Thus, while endorsing the notion that some issues should be considered off limits for press coverage, at least one newspaper said people questioned why reporters could be sanctioned for reporting that was factual and accurate. Phan Quang, president of the Vietnam Journalists' Association, an official body, was quoted in Tuoi Tre (Youth) newspaper as telling legislators: "Journalists cannot commit crimes when their reporting is correct...They only bear responsibility for reporting information which is not permissible to report, and in this case, they are only responsible for not abiding by their superiors." Tuoi Tre also quoted legislator Phan Thi Tien as questioning the provision: "Will media organizations have to pay compensation for losses for their stories on a company producing bad- quality goods because of a boycott by buyers?"38

However in another article, Vietnam Journalists' Association President Quang appeared to have changed his position, firmly backing the provisions of the new law. In a long article interpreting and lauding the new law in Tap Chi Cong San, the theoretical journal of the Party central committee, Phan Quang instructed reporters to publish the conclusions of competent state agencies even if they did not agree with such conclusions:

The revision and amendment [of the Press Law] was also aimed at upholding the social responsibility and obligations of press organs and journalists, determining the authority and obligations of press management agencies, complementing and strengthening the state management of the press, and clearly defining the responsibility of all society for the development of the press in the stage of national industrialization and modernization... The overriding requirement is that after being revisedand amended, the current Press Law still has to institutionalize the viewpoint that the press is placed under the Party leadership and the state management and operates in strict accordance with the law.39

Internet access is tightly controlled for Vietnam's approximately 30,000 subscribers. While there are four active Internet providers in Vietnam, the government maintains control over Vietnam's only Internet access provider, Vietnam Data Communications (VDC). VDC is authorized to monitor subscribers' access to sites and to use "firewalls" to block connections to sites operated by Vietnamese groups abroad that are critical of the government. In April 1999 Ho Chi Minh City police charged that the Internet was being used to leak state secrets as well as to import reactionary materials from "hostile forces" overseas. The police requested that the local people's committee be given full control over the Internet.40 Although Nguyen Dan Que was able to open an Internet account after his release from prison, it was suspended in May 1999 after he issued a critical statement by e-mail. In January 2000 the Foreign Ministry stated that all information relayed through the Internet in Vietnam must comply with national security provisions in the Press and Publication laws, which ban information aimed at "sabotaging the Vietnamese government" and harming national security, national unity, national defense, or foreign relations. Also banned from Internet traffic in Vietnam, according to the Foreign Ministry, is any information damaging to the reputations of organizations or citizens.41

The foreign press and contacts between local journalists and international media representatives also come under governmental scrutiny and controls. A government directive adopted in September 1997 requires Vietnamese journalists to obtain approval from the Ministry of Culture and Information before passing any information to foreign reporters. The Ministry of Culture has also restricted domestic media coverage of rural unrest and the banking system and has instructed news editors to tone down critical economic coverage. Foreign journalists based in Vietnam have received strong warnings from government officials or had difficulty renewing their visas after focusing too much coverage on the dissidents, for example, by seeking to contact and interview Tran Do. On December 26, 1999, Pham The Hung, a French journalist working for Radio France International (RFI), was expelled from Vietnam after meeting with members of Hanoi's Catholic community whose names were not on a list of interviewees he had submitted as part of his journalist visa request.42 On April 13, a reporter for L'Express, who was not working on a press visa, was detained and interrogated in Ho Chi Minh City after trying to contact dissidents for interviews.

Vietnamese listeners have access to most international radio stations, but the government jams access to Radio Free Asia.43 Foreign publications are occasionally censored; for example, during the visit of U.S. Defense Secretary William Cohen to Vietnam in March 2000, government censors blacked out sections of a Wall Street Journal editorial about his visit.44 While foreign language newspapers and magazines can be purchased in the major cities, in December1999 an internal Customs Department bulletin announced a crackdown on illegally imported foreign publications because of their "poisonous" content (magazines and newspapers arrive in Vietnam on international airline flights and then are resold in local bookstores and newsstands). Singled out for confiscation as particularly "noxious" were the South China Morning Post, the Asian Wall Street Journal, Singapore's Straits Times, and Thailand's Nation.45

These restrictions of the media violate Article 69 of the Vietnamese constitution, which states that "citizens are entitled to freedom of speech and freedom of the press," as well as Article 19 of the ICCPR, to which Vietnam is a state party.

30 "Journalism in Vietnam," unpublished conference paper by Robert Templer, April 29, 1998. 31 1993 Publishing Law, Article 9. The 1993 law is discussed in Human Rights Watch, "Human Rights in a Season of Transition: Law and Dissent in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam," A Human Rights Watch Report, vol. 7, no. 12, August 1995, p.5. 32 1993 Publishing Law, Article 2. 33 1993 Publishing Law, Article 22; BBC, Summary of World Broadcasts, FE/1761 B/6, August 7, 1993. Zachary Abuza, "The Vietnamese Press Under General Secretaries Do Muoi and Le Kha Phieu," draft chapter, unpublished manuscript on file at Human Rights Watch.

34 Human Rights Watch, "Human Rights in a Season of Transition," p.9; Abuza, "The Vietnamese Press," draft chapter.

35 Khanh Toan, "Interview with Senior Lt. Gen. Pham Van Tra, Vietnamese minister of National Defense," Hanoi Quan Doi Nhan Dan, January 11, 1999, reprinted in FBIS-EAS-99-029.

36 BBC Worldwide Monitoring, translation of amendments to Press Law, passed by the 10th National Assembly's Fifth Session in Hanoi, June 12th, 1999, as published in Vietnamese in Nhan Dan, July 6, 1999; VNA, "National Assembly Passes Amended Press Law," May 19, 1999; Reuters, "Vietnam tightens state controls over local media," May 20, 1999; Associated Press, "Stricter Laws for Vietnamese Media," May 21, 1999.

37 BBC Worldwide Monitoring, translation of amendments to Press Law, article 9.

38 Associated Press, "Stricter Laws for Vietnamese Media," May 21, 1999.

39 Phan Quang, "Another Step Forward in Perfecting the Legal Corridor of the Press," Hanoi Tap Chi Cong San, No. 12, June 1999, reprinted in FBIS-EAS-1999-0730.

40 Associated Press, "Internet must be controlled, advise police," April 8, 1999.

41 Vietnam News Agency, "Internet's Viet Nam Input, Output Must Comply with Local Law, Stresses Spokesperson," January 20, 2000.

42 Agence France Presse, "Vietnam says journalist was working `beyond his profession'", January 6, 2000. Also see Reporters Sans Frontiers Press Freedom Alert, "Vietnam: RFI journalist told to leave the country," December 28, 1999.

43 1999 Vietnam Country Report on Human Rights Practices, Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor, U.S. Department of State, February 25, 2000.

44 The editorial stated that "Hanoi is currently engaged in a Stalinesque clamp down" on corruption and wrote that the Vietnamese Communist Party is "still at war with itself over whether to further open the Vietnamese economy." Government censors blacked out the words "Stalinesque" and "still at war with itself." Robert Burns, "The Past is Revisited in Vietnam," Associated Press, March 15, 2000.

45 Huw Watkin, "Customs clamp on foreign publications," South China Morning Post, December 10, 1999.



-- (Cán_Ngố_Ãn-Dải-Dút@BBP.govt), September 28, 2004.


And JUBE do you think these religiuos priest and scholars are the threat to your Thuggist Boody Vietnamese Communist Party and Government?????

Thinking straight you Oxy Moron Idiot JUBE a Secret Cyber Communist Police

********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* ***************************

Recent Reports Support HRW About HRW Site Map

Appendix A: Partial List of Political Prisoners in Vietnam, April 29, 2000 Because of lack of access to Vietnam's prisons by independent monitors, it is not possible to provide a comprehensive listing of all individuals currently imprisoned or detained in Vietnam for peaceful expression of their political or religious beliefs. The following listing provides a sampling of representative cases derived from investigations by Human Rights Watch and from secondary sources that provided sufficient information to indicate a high probability that the persons have been imprisoned for their religious or political beliefs. This listing should not be considered to be exhaustive. Human Rights Watch has received many more names of possible political prisoners in Vietnam from family members of detainees, international organizations, and governments that have not been presented here because available information is too scarce to confirm the accounts.

Buddhists

Thich Huyen Quang Born 1917. Supreme Patriarch of the Unified Buddhist Church of Vietnam (UBCV), which is not recognized by the government. He was first arrested in April 1977 and then again in 1982 for his work with the UBCV. In December 1994 he was arrested again on charges of organizing an UBCV flood relief operation in the Mekong Delta. Suffers from high blood pressure and a lung condition. Currently under pagoda arrest in Nghia Hanh district, Quang Ngai province.

Thich Thien Minh (secular name Huynh Van Ba) Born 1954. Buddhist monk and member of the UBCV, he was arrested in 1979 and sentenced to life imprisonment on charges of trying to overthrow the government. In 1986 he was sentenced to a second life sentence for attempted escape. Currently detained in K2 disciplinary subcamp of Z30A prison camp, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province. Declared a victim of arbitrary detention by the U.N. Working Group on Arbitrary Detention in 1997. The U.N. Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance visited him in October 1998 in Z30A prison camp.

Thich Hue Dang (secular name Nguyen Ngoc Dat) Born 1943, Buddhist monk and UBCV member. On May 28 1992, he was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment for writings about Buddhism and democratic reform. Suffering from diabetes. Reportedly detained in Z30A prison camp, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province; when the U.N. Special Rapporteur on Religious Intolerance tried to visit Thich Hue Dang there in October 1998, he was told that he was not in the camp.

Hoa Hao

Le Minh Triet (also known as Tu Triet) Fifty-eight years old. His house was raided by police in December 1993 after he practiced Hoa Hao Buddhism in his home and set up an altar there. After reporting the incident to a Japanese radio station and international human rights organizations, security police arrested and detained him in Long Xuyen prison in An Giang province. He was later reportedly charged with the crime of disrespect for national law and conspiracy with reactionary forces overseas. His exact whereabouts now are unclear.

Cao Dai

Ms. Le Kim Bien Fifty-one years old. Arrested in October 1998 after requesting a meeting with U.N. Special Rapporteur for Religious Intolerance, Abdelfattah Amor during his October 1998 visit to Vietnam. She was one of the vice-chairs of the Cao Dai religion in Kien Giang province. Currently serving a two-year sentence in Rach Gia, the provincial capital of Kien Giang province.

Pham Cong Hien (Thien Nhon) Fifty years old. Arrested in October 1998 after requesting a meeting with U.N. Special Rapporteur for Religious Intolerance, Abdelfattah Amor during his October 1998 visit to Vietnam. One of the vice- chairs of the Cao Dai religion in Kien Giang province. Currently serving a two-year sentence in Rach Gia, the provincial capital of Kien Giang province.

Catholics

Father Nguyen Van De Roman Catholic priest in Tien Giang province; reportedly a member of the Sacerdotal Maria Movement. He was arrested in October 1987 with ten others and charged by the Ho Chi Minh City People's Court with "spreading counterrevolutionary propaganda through religious activities." In August 1990 he was sentenced to ten years' imprisonment. He is currently detained in A20 prison camp in Xuan Phuoc, Phu Yen province.

Father John Bosco Pham Minh Tri Born 1941. Roman Catholic monk and member of the Congregation of the Mother Co-Redemptrix. Arrested on May 20, 1987 with about sixty other Catholic clergy and lay people for conducting trainings and distributing religious books without government permission. On October 30, 1987 he was convicted, along with twenty-two others, of security offenses, including "conducting propaganda to oppose the socialist regime and undermining the policy of unity and the disruption of public security." He was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment and is now suffering from mental problems. Reportedly detained in Z30A prison camp, Ham Tan, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province.

Brother Benedito Nguyen Viet Huan (Nguyen Thien Phung) Born 1951. Member of the Catholic Congregation of the Mother Co- Redemptrix. Arrested on June 18, 1987 and sentenced on October 30, 1987 to sixteen years' imprisonment (some reports say twenty) for "conducting propaganda to oppose the socialist regime and undermining the policy of unity and the disruption of public security." In poor health. Currently detained in Z30A prison camp, Ham Tan, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province.

Brother John Euder Mai Duc Chuong, also known as Mai Huu Nghi Born 1931. Member of the Congregation of the Mother Co-Redemptrix. Arrested on May 20, 1987 and sentenced on October 30, 1987 to twenty years' imprisonment (some reports say eighteen) for "conducting propaganda to oppose the socialist regime and undermining the policy of unity and the disruption of public security." Previously detained in K-3 prison camp, Long Khanh, Dong Nai Province; currently thought to be detained in Xuan Loc camp, Dong Nai province.

Brother Michael Nguyen Van Thin, also known as Nguyen Minh Quan Born 1952. Member of the Congregation of the Mother Co-Redemptrix. Arrested on May 20, 1987 and convicted of "conducting propaganda to oppose the socialist regime and undermining the policy of unity and the disruption of public security." On October 30, 1987, he was sentenced to sixteen years' imprisonment. Reportedly in poor health. Currently detained in Z30A prison camp, Ham Tan, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province.

Lau Si Phuc Born 1968. Lay believer of the Congregation of the Mother Co- Redemptrix. Arrested on May 20, 1987 and sentenced to eighteen years' imprisonment on October 30, 1987 for "conducting propaganda to oppose the socialist regime and undermining the policy of unity and the disruption of public security." Reportedly detained in Z30A prison camp, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province.

Nguyen Van Dan Born 1966. Lay believer of the Congregation of the Mother Co- Redemptrix. Arrested on May 20, 1987 and sentenced to fourteen years' imprisonment on October 30, 1987 for "conducting propaganda to oppose the socialist regime andundermining the policy of unity and the disruption of public security." Reportedly detained in Z30A prison camp, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province.

Le Xuan Son Born 1966. Lay believer of the Congregation of the Mother Co- Redemptrix. Arrested on June 18, 1987 and sentenced to fourteen years' imprisonment on October 30, 1987 for "conducting propaganda to oppose the socialist regime and undermining the policy of unity and the disruption of public security." Reportedly detained Z30A prison camp, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province.

Protestant

Ms. Nguyen Thi Thuy Arrested in October 1999 during a church meeting in her home in Phu Tho; sentenced on December 27, 1999 to one year in prison for "interfering with an officer doing his duty."

Dinh Troi (ethnic Hre) Detained for unauthorized religious activities in Quang Nai province.

Vu Gian Thao (ethnic Hmong) Arrested in July 1997 for unauthorized religious activities and "abusing freedom of religion" in Huoi Xua Hamlet, Muong Lai District, Lai Chau Province. Sentenced to two years' imprisonment and held in Dien Bien Phu prison in Lai Chai province.

Sung Phai Dia (Hmong) Imprisoned in Dien Bien Phu prison in Lai Chai province under the section of the Penal Code that prohibits "abusing the freedom of religion."

Vang Gia Chua (Hmong) Arrested in late 1999 in Ha Giang province and imprisoned for unauthorized religious activities.

Sung Va Tung (Hmong) Imprisoned in Dien Bien Phu prison in Lai Chai province for unauthorized religious activities.

Sung Seo Chinh (Hmong) Imprisoned in Dien Bien Phu prison in Lai Chai province for unauthorized religious activities.

Sinh Phay Pao (Hmong) Arrested in late 1999 in Ha Giang province and imprisoned for unauthorized religious activities.

Va Sinh Giay(Hmong) Arrested in late 1999 in Ha Giang province and imprisoned for unauthorized religious activities.

Phang A Dong (Hmong) Arrested in late 1999 and imprisoned in C-10 Prison in Dien Bien, Lai Chau province, for unauthorized religious activities.

Vang Sua Giang (Hmong) Arrested in late 1999 in Ha Giang province and imprisoned for unauthorized religious activities.

Lau Dung Xa (Hmong) Currently imprisoned for unauthorized religious activities in C-10 Prison in Dien Bien, Lai Chau province.

Political

Nguyen Dinh Huy (alias Ngo Tran Huan, Nguyen Viet Than, Viet Huy) Born 1932. Founder in 1993 of the. He was arrested on November 17, 1993 and sentenced in April 1995 to fifteen years' imprisonment for allegedly "acting to overthrow the people's government" for having produced political manifestos and other documents. The movement's stated aims were to promote peaceful political change and free elections. In November 1993 the group attempted to organize an international conference in Ho Chi Minh City on development and democracy. Since May 1996 he has been imprisoned in Z30A prison camp, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province. He is reportedly suffering from Parkinson's Disease.

Nguyen Ngoc Tan (alias Pham Tu San, alias Pham Thai) Born 1921. A founder and first vice-chair of the Movement to Unite the People and Build Democracy. Placed under house arrest in November 1993, detained on February 11, 1994, and sentenced in August 1995 to eleven years' imprisonment. Since May 1996 he has been imprisoned in Z30A prison camp, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province.

Pham Tran Anh Born 1945. A member of the Movement for a Free Vietnam, he was arrested on July 3, 1977 and charged with "conspiring to overthrow the government." In 1978 he was sentenced to life imprisonment, which was reduced to twenty years' in 1994. Reportedly in poor health, he is currently imprisoned in Z30A prison camp, Xuan Loc, Dong Nai province.

Vo Van Pham Born 1947. Arrested on July 6, 1991 for allegedly trying to overthrow the government and advocating the establishment of a multi- party system. In July 1991 he was sentenced to twelve years imprisonment. Sentence later reduced by forty-five months. Held in the public security prison, Nghia Ky village, Tu Nghia district.

Pham Hong To (Pham Hong Tho) Born 1922. Arrested on June 6, 1991 and charged with trying to overthrow the government and meeting with others to plan a multi- party system. In July 1991 he was sentenced to thirteen years imprisonment, a verdict upheld in May 1993, and was held in the public security prison, Nghia Ky village, Tu Nghia district, Nghia Binh province. His current status is unknown.

Le Van Tinh Born 1941. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996, and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam with twenty-one other PAP members on December 5, 1996. Two PAP members were subsequently released; the others were tried in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. Le Van Triet was sentenced to twenty years' imprisonment.

Questions have been raised as to whether the PAP has been guided solely by peaceful advocacy. However, Human Rights Watch has not discovered any evidence that the twenty-one PAP members arrested in 1996 were involved in anything other than peaceful advocacy and organizing for democratic change in Vietnam.

Nguyen Tuan Nam (Nguyen Giang Bao, Lam Son) Born 1938. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to eighteen years' imprisonment (some reports say nineteen) in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Nguyen Van Trai Born 1930. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to fifteen years' imprisonment (some reports say fourteen) in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Tran Cong Minh Born 1945. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to twelve years' imprisonment (some reports say thirteen) in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Ms. Vuong Thi Vieng Born 1950. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to nine years' imprisonment (some reports say ten) in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Ms. Nguyen Thi Viet Nhan Born 1955. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to nine years' imprisonment in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Ms. Kim Hoa Born 1948. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to eight years' imprisonment in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Le Dong Phuong Born 1960. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to twelve years' imprisonment (some reports say thirteen) in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Phan Huu Tri (Dr. Nguyen Minh Tri) Born 1948. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to eight years' imprisonment in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Nguyen Minh Chi Born 1958. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to six years' imprisonment in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Thach Duoc Born 1954. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to eight years'imprisonment in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Nguyen Van Thoi Born 1937. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to four years' imprisonment in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Dinh Van Lu (Nguyen Van Lu) Born 1944. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to four years' imprisonment (some reports say five) in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Lam Kien Born 1933. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to nine years' imprisonment in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Ly Nhat Thanh (Hung-Thanh Hoang Ly) Born 1956. Member of the People's Action Party (PAP), or Dang Nhan Dan Hanh Dong. Arrested in Thailand on November 28, 1996 and deported from Cambodia to Vietnam on December 5, 1996. Sentenced to twelve years' imprisonment (some reports say fourteen) in a trial in An Giang province on September 8, 1999 for attempting to overthrow the government. (See note above, for Le Van Tinh, about the People's Action Party.)

Doan Van Khanh Sentenced on March 22, 1999 to one year's imprisonment on charges of disseminating open letters, distorting the truth, talking ill about the regime, and publicizing activities affecting social order and security. As of this writing, Human Rights Watch was not able to confirm his release from prison.

Bui Duc Phu Sentenced on March 22, 1999 to one year's imprisonment on charges of disseminating open letters, distorting the truth, talking ill about the regime, and publicizing activities affecting social order and security. As of this writing, Human Rights Watch was not able to confirm his release from prison.



-- (Cán_Ngố_Ãn-Dải-Dút@BBP.govt), September 28, 2004.


And what the hell is this in Vietnam you oxy moron and coward vietnamse communist cyber secret police pig ?

********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* ***********************

VIETNAM TODAY: AN OCCASIONAL SERIES

Widening Economic Gap Keeps Vietnam Divided By MARK LANDLER AIPHONG, Vietnam, April 19 — Just outside this port city on Vietnam's northeastern coast lies the Nomura-Haiphong Industrial Zone, a 377-acre swath of land as green and table-flat as the rice paddies next to it. Where the smokestacks and assembly lines of giant factories were supposed to rise, there are only windswept fields, stretching unbroken to the horizon. Nomura, the Japanese bank, has fought a losing battle to lure foreign companies since it opened the zone in 1997. Only two set up shop here last year, an auto-parts maker and a chemical plant, both Japanese. Ho Dinh Tien, the zone's good-natured executive director, who keeps watch from a dozy office at the front gate, said Nomura no longer even sets goals for the number of new occupants.

"There was a time when foreign companies came to Vietnam," Mr. Tien said as he gazed wistfully out the window. "Now is not that time."

In its grandeur and folly, Nomura's field of dreams epitomizes what has gone wrong with the Vietnamese economy since it first opened to the outside world in 1988. Built to catch the flood of foreign investors into Vietnam, the zone — and many others like it in northern Vietnam — has been strangled by government red tape, balky customs officials, and overly aggressive tax collectors.

The New York Times

--------------------------------------------------------------------- -----------

Yet 700 miles south, on the outskirts of Ho Chi Minh City, the former Saigon, one finds an entirely different world. There, in Dong Nai province, factories have sprung up like tumbleweeds along the dusty north-south highway. Nike, Fujitsu, and dozens of other foreign companies are churning out athletic shoes, circuit boards, and cigarettes. Despite ramshackle facilities and an almost comical lack of central planning, Dong Nai has become the fastest-growing region in the country.

"You have these two competing forces in Vietnam: one focused on production and the other on extraction," said Thomas J. Vallely, the director of the Indochina program at the Harvard Institute for International Development. "The question is, which is going to prevail?"

For years, Mr. Vallely and other experts believed that Vietnam's enterprising south would drag the more cautious, politically encrusted north into the global economy. But 25 years after the war that unified Vietnam, the north and south remain divided economically. And the gap is widening: Dong Nai's exports grew by 22 percent in the first half of 1999, while Haiphong's declined by 15 percent.

Despite the south's success, some experts say it is the old-style Communists in Hanoi, not the capitalists in Ho Chi Minh City, who have the upper hand in the battle for Vietnam's future. Hanoi has balked at signing a trade agreement with the United States. And despite years of promises, it has done little to clear the bureaucratic underbrush that makes Vietnam a deeply frustrating place to do business.

"Sadly, although Vietnam has become more competitive in absolute terms, it is less competitive relative to its Asian neighbors than it was a few years ago," said Wolfgang Bertelsmeier, the chief of mission of the International Finance Corporation, a division of the World Bank.

Foreign direct investment, which used to pour into Vietnam at a rate of more than $4 billion a year, trickled to $1.4 billion in 1999 and is likely to fall further this year. Those numbers overstate the actual dollars flowing into Vietnam, since the government approves many more projects than are built. Experts figure that the country drew no more $600 million in hard dollars last year.

DWINDLING INVESTMENT Foreign direct investment, which not long ago poured into Vietnam, declined to $1.4 billion in 1999 and is likely to fall further this year.

Leading investors in Vietnam* 1988-1999 (in U.S. dollars) Singapore $5.9 billion Taiwan 4.6 Hong Kong 3.6 Japan 3.3 South Korea 3.1 France 2.1 British Virgin Islands 1.7 Russia 1.5 United States 1.2 United Kingdom 1.3 *Represents value of investments approved by the Vietnamese government. Actual money spent is roughly one-third of each amount. Source: Vietnam Ministry of Planning and Investment and Government Statistics Office

--------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------- Some of the decline is due to the Asian crisis, which forced big spenders like Japan and South Korea to pull in their horns. But much of it can be laid to Vietnam's stifling bureaucracy. Companies like Oracle have folded their tents, while others, like Procter & Gamble, have fallen into bitter disputes with their Vietnamese partners.

Dwindling foreign investment has sapped Vietnam's exports and hobbled its growth. After barreling along at 9.5 percent in 1995 and 8.8 percent in 1997, Vietnam's economic output fell to 5.8 percent in 1998 and 4.8 percent last year. Economists say it will be lucky to match that this year.

While neighbors like the Philippines have developed thriving electronics industries, Vietnam is struggling to hold on to its handful of technology investors. Even those companies that are welcomed by the Vietnamese, like Fujitsu, must wait years to get their projects approved.

"When we first came here, we had many problems negotiating with Hanoi," said Shuzo Kawashima, the president of the Fujitsu factory in Dong Nai, which employs 2,728 workers. "They kept changing their minds. Now we deal only with the local government, which is much easier."

Mr. Kawashima showed a visitor around his factory, which has Vietnam's first "clean room" for assembling advanced computer circuits. At the rear of the plant is a loading dock, where customs officials from Dong Nai inspect and stamp boxes of Fujitsu circuit boards before they leave the factory. The boards are then exported to Japan, Thailand and the Philippines, where they are installed in laptop computers.

Unlike companies in the north, officials at Fujitsu said they rarely have trouble with customs officials. They said the provincial authorities were also helpful in the day-to-day issues of running a factory, like providing reliable electricity and adequate waste- water treatment.

Nike has also gravitated to southern Vietnam. All five of its contract factories are within a two-hour drive of Ho Chi Minh City, even though workers' salaries there are the highest in the country. Nike's contractors employ more than 45,000 workers, making it the leading source of private employment in Vietnam. Many of these people have migrated to Dong Nai from the north.

Nguyen The Thu Nga, a 27-year-old woman from Quang Binh province in north-central Vietnam, used to sell fish and vegetables in her village. Three years ago, she came to work in a Nike factory, where she glues together the rubber soles of running shoes. The work is grueling and the Korean bosses are strict. But life is better than in Quang Binh, where Ms. Nga said her village was ruined by recent floods.

"For a farmer in Vietnam, having a stable job and a basic wage is enough," Ms. Nga said, as she played with her baby after a 10-hour shift.

Executives at Nike said the Vietnamese government regularly encourages the company to shift manufacturing to the north. Among other things, such a move would stem the tide of migration to Ho Chi Minh City, which has become dangerously overcrowded in recent years.

But Chris Helzer, Nike's director of government affairs in Vietnam, said, "To build a factory up north would present problems that would be difficult to overcome."

Vietnamese officials are well aware of the north's poor reputation among foreign investors. They explain it as a vestige of Vietnam's history, in which the south was exposed to the capitalism of the United States while the north languished in the orbit of the Soviet Union. Over time, they insist, northern officials will shed old habits.

"The south is absolutely more dynamic and creative than the north, but only in the short term," said Nguyen Chon Trung, vice chairman of Ho Chi Minh City's industrial zone authority. "The government will develop policies to strike a better balance between north and south."

Mr. Tien of Nomura said some of the strongest resistance to change comes not from central but from local authorities. He said Vietnam's prime minister and Communist Party chief had traveled to Haiphong to urge the city to be more helpful to foreigners. This prodding came even after Haiphong donated the land for the industrial zone.

"Dong Nai was able to be more liberal because it was a rural area and the government didn't pay much attention to it," Mr. Tien said. "But Haiphong was always regarded as one of the country's industrial centers, so it was more tightly regulated."

Indeed, Haiphong may eventually realize its potential. The city should benefit from its proximity to China, which is likely to emerge as Vietnam's largest market.

Geographic disparities in growth are not necessarily harmful. In China, for example, the free-wheeling southern coastal provinces provided the kindling for the country's broader growth. In Vietnam, however, the imbalance could eventually damage the south.

The Vietnamese government steers more foreign aid money and tax dollars to northern provinces. It also spends more on public-works projects, as anyone flying from Ho Chi Minh City's somewhat decrepit airport to Hanoi's soon-to-be-expanded one can attest.

While prosperous, Dong Nai lacks decent housing, roads and public transportation. At 4 p.m., when the whistles at its factories blow, the streets are choked with motorcycles and bicycles. The migrant workers sleep four or five to a room in grim, hastily constructed cement blocks.

"The Vietnamese government could wreck Dong Nai by not providing adequate infrastructure around those factories," said Brian Quinn, the country coordinator of the Harvard Institute for International Development. "This is a case of starving the south to feed the north

-- (Cán_Ngố_Ãn-Dải-Dút@BBP.govt), September 28, 2004.



And in Vietnam today latesr news you Oxy Moron Idiot JUBE : Open your eyes wide and read the article so you can gain some lessons learned before you open you mouth or post any irrelevant post in defending the thuggist bloody Vietnamese Communist Mafia Government of yours.

********************************************************************* ********************************************************************* *****************

In Vietnam today Jeff Jacoby (Boston Globe) August 9, 2004

With the presidential race generating so much talk of John Kerry's Vietnam record, one could almost forget that "Vietnam" is not just the name of a war that ended 30 years ago. It is also the name of a country of 82 million human beings -- men, women, and children who live under one of the most repressive dictatorships on Earth. Whatever political value there may be in recalling the Vietnam of years gone by, it is the people of Vietnam today who desperately need our attention.

"Vietnam is one of the most tightly controlled societies in the world," reports Freedom House, the well-known human rights monitor. "The regime jails or harasses most dissidents, controls all media, sharply restricts religious freedom, and prevents Vietnamese from setting up independent political, labor, or religious groups."

Late last month, for example, the regime sentenced Nguyen Dan Que, a 62-year-old physician, to 30 months in prison for the crime of "abusing democratic freedoms." Translation: He wrote essays condemning government censorship and posted them on the internet.

This wasn't Que's first encounter with communist justice. He was arrested in 1990 after publicly calling for free elections and multiparty democracy. The government charged him with sedition and sentenced him to 20 years imprisonment. In 1998, after being released as part of a general amnesty, he was invited to leave the country. When he refused to go into exile, he was placed under house arrest, deprived of his telephone and computer, and barred from resuming his medical work. But Que would not be intimidated, and continued to speak out for freedom. Now he is behind bars again.

Prodemocracy activists are not the only victims of Vietnam's one- party dictatorship. For years the regime has persecuted the indigenous highland tribes known as Montagnards, singling them out for religious repression -- most are devout Christians -- and confiscating their ancestral lands. In April, when some Montagnards staged a peaceful protest to demand religious freedom, the government reacted with a violent crackdown. Hundreds of Montagnards were beaten by police and by ethnic Vietnamese armed with clubs and metal rods.

"They beat the demonstrators, including children," one eyewitness told Human Rights Watch. "People's arms and legs were broken, their skulls cracked. Children were separated from their parents. Near Ea Knir bridge, two people were killed. . . . Fire trucks came. . . . They pushed the tractors in the river, even with people still riding on them." Other witnesses told of protesters being blinded with tear gas, then handcuffed, taken away, and never seen again. Some Montagnards were tortured. Human Rights Watch mentions two who were tied up and hung over a fire until their limbs were scorched.

Few Americans have made an issue of Vietnam's harsh denial of political and religious liberty. One who has is Representative Chris Smith of New Jersey, an outspoken defender of human rights worldwide and author of a bill linking growth in US aid to Vietnam to "substantial progress" in Vietnam's human rights record. Smith's bill, the Vietnam Human Rights Act, passed the House by an overwhelming 410-1 vote in 2001. But it never got a hearing or a vote in the Senate, where it was blocked by the then-chairman of the East Asian and Pacific Affairs subcommittee -- John Kerry.

Last month the House again passed Smith's bill, this time by a vote of 323 to 45. As in 2001, says Smith, the message of the bill is that "human rights are central -- they are at the core of our relationship with governments and the people they purport to represent."

Predictably, the vote sent Hanoi into high dudgeon, and it denounced Smith's legislation as "a gross interference into Vietnam's internal affairs." In truth, the bill would amount to little more than a slap on the wrist. It would have no effect on the roughly $40 million in foreign aid currently going to Vietnam every year. Only *increases* in that aid would be blocked, and only if they were earmarked for non-humanitarian purposes.

Opponents of the bill, like Kerry and Senator John McCain of Arizona, insist that the carrot of "engagement" will do more to nurture human rights in Vietnam than the stick of sanctions.

But that claim has been proven false by the experience of the last three years, Smith argues. Vietnam's treatment of dissidents and religious minorities has gotten worse, not better, since diplomatic and trade relations with the United States were normalized in 2001. The Vietnam Human Rights Act "would be law right now if it hadn't been for Kerry," Smith says, "and some of those dissidents would be out of prison." By blocking the sanctions bill three years ago, Kerry ensured only that Hanoi's repression would continue unabated.

Will he block it again this year? The Kerry campaign hadn't replied to an inquiry as of late Friday, and Smith claims no inside knowledge. "But I know this much," he said the other day. "The best and brightest and bravest people in Vietnam are in prison, persecuted by the government for their opinions or their faith. And you don't do people who are suffering immeasurable cruelty any kindness by aiding a dictatorship

-- (Cán_Ngố_Ãn-Dải-Dút@BBP.govt), September 28, 2004.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ