A huge similarity between Clinton and W

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Unk's Troll-free Private Saloon : One Thread

In the national security area, there was a huge amount of posturing and pretending on the part of Clinton and his Administration.

In the economic area, there is a huge amount of posturing and pretending on the part of W and his Administration.

-- Peter Errington (petere7@starpower.net), July 26, 2002

Answers

W's posture is much superior to Clinton's. His back is straight, his shoulders square, his head held high. Clinton's posture is slouchy, weasely.

Many studies have shown a strong correlation between posture and moral character.

Thank you for making this important point, Peter.

-- (Cyber Jung @ sand.pile), July 26, 2002.


Wrong again Errorton. Clinton and Dumbya are about as similar as night and day. In the intelligence category they are at the opposite ends of the spectrum. Clinton is a genius, Dumbya is an imbecile.

-- lol (dumbya@neanderthal.caveman), July 26, 2002.

William J. Clinton is a morally bankrupt piece of trailer trash and all of the education in the world could not change this basic truth. Although highly educated and a world class speaker, Clinton was hardly a genius and brought shame to this country. If ‘genius’ is getting head from a 20 year-old ‘star fucker, in the Oval Office while serving as our sitting President, and allowing the entire world to find out….then Jimmy Swaggert must be the smartest human on earth.

Clinton could never shake off his slimey character and given much more time, he would have allowed this country to lean towards and embrace communist values. The low life’s that Democrats appeal to could care less about moral responsibility and ethical behavior. Not part of their critical thinking process.

-- What (do@you.think?), July 26, 2002.


Well I look at this in a very pedestrian manner. Very simple.

With Clinton, we had budget excesses into the future, high employment, no terrorist attacks inside the US, no war; need I go on.

Now with Bush reverse all of those statements and add the greatest transfer of wealth between the middle class and the upper income class and the largest loss of personal freedom since WWII. Any attempt to lay the blame for Bush's problems on Clinton is pissing in the wind. Why do you think so many Republicans aren't running for re-election?

The country misses Clinton. No wonder they re-elected him. As has been said before, the wisdom comes from the common people. :<)))

Best Wishes,,,,,

Z

-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), July 26, 2002.


And if Gore had become President in 2000, there would have no WTC and no stock crash. Z, you are too intelligent to write such drivel.

-- (lars@indy.net), July 26, 2002.


Lars, you beat me to it.

-- Peter Errington (petere7@starpower.net), July 26, 2002.

Lars and Errorton, you sound like dumb pugs.

-- lol (maybe it's because @ you .are!), July 26, 2002.

"And if Gore had become President in 2000, there would have no WTC and no stock crash. Z, you are too intelligent to write such drivel.

-- (lars@indy.net), July 26, 2002."

LOL Lars! The bold part sounds like you were referring to yourself! What does any of what you wrote have to do with what Z wrote? Answer: NADA, because it's stupid drivel. In your case though, you're NOT "too intelligent" to write it!

-- lol (talking@to.yourself), July 26, 2002.


Don't like Clinton
Don't like Bush
Why don't you all cut the crap
And just get Rush.

-- T.S.Eliot (the@great.beyond), July 26, 2002.


Rush Limbaugh?

BWAAAAAAAHAAAAAHAHHAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAAA!

He's a major league asshole, and a big supporter of Dumbya. Now THERE is someone who might even be a worse president than Dumbya. Actually, it isn't possible to be worse than THE worst, so they are both equally shitty, the absolute worst that ever was or ever will be possible in the human race. This is assuming they ARE human beings, which is highly questionable.

-- lol (you gots ta @ be. shittun me), July 26, 2002.



Trollboy, Z is capable defending his own drivel but he can't defend yours.

-- (lars@indy.net), July 27, 2002.

Nothing like Z telling us that it's all "Very simple."

-- Carlos (riffraff@cybertime.net), July 27, 2002.

Whatever Lars. Like I said, you were the one who was driveling this time, not Z.

-- (you're@being.repugnant), July 27, 2002.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ