How nice is SIGMA 28-135 zoom for a professionalgreenspun.com : LUSENET : Canon EOS FAQ forum : One Thread |
How nice is SIGMA 28-135 AFzoom for professional use. MY body is EOS300.
-- Nasim Akhtar (printingprofessionals@hotmail.com), May 19, 2002
Er. Is this some sort of joke? The EOS 300 is rarely considered to be a 'professional' camera, let alone a dirt cheap (under $200 US) Sigma zoom lens.
-- NK Guy (tela@tela.bc.ca), May 19, 2002.
How good is my kodak disposible for pro use? same answer.
-- louis brown (louisb@cnet.com), May 19, 2002.
you have a great body...???
-- sajeev (chack74@yahoo.co.in), May 20, 2002.
This is a photography forum, not a pickup joint!
-- NK Guy (tela@tela.bc.ca), May 20, 2002.
SIGMA 28-135 is a great lens, but only for its price. The best choice, but only in budget zooms
-- Klim (candel@aport.ru), May 25, 2002.
The words (great lens) and (best choice) should have some meaning, If you are refering to a canon 28-105, 24-85,28-135is, or even a nikon 28-105, 24-120, or minolta 24-105. then maybe those words would have some meaning in refering to the budget zoom class. But to use those words for a cheaply constructed 13 element Sigma is a joke.-LB
-- louis brown (louisb@cnet.com), May 25, 2002.