Delicate Arch, rear view

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Nature Photography Image Critique : One Thread

Shrunk down to meet image size requirements for this board. Delicate Arch, February 2002, Minolta X-570, 24mm @ f/8, 1/60th or so, E100VS with Tiffen warming polarizer. Thanks for your comments.

-- Christian Deichert (torgophile@aol.com), April 17, 2002

Answers

Nice composition. You have certainly captured the texture well. The sky kind of bothers me. (that's just my opinion.)

-- M. Huber (rurpho@tele-net.net), April 17, 2002.

Great Image.....nicely composed....I like the way the arc curves from one point to another. IMHO, the sky is too polarized.

-- Poniman Mulijadi (pn_photo@yahoo.com), April 18, 2002.

Interesting composition and good color. But not only the sky is too dark, possibly as the result of too much polarization, the top left of the image is also too dark, losing details in the rock. Personally, I don't like E100VS; it is too saturdated and the colors too exaggerated. With this film, I would use less or even no polarization at high altitute such as in Utah. A graduated neutral- density filter would help brighten up the top left.

-- Shun Cheung (shun@att.net), April 21, 2002.

GIVE ANY PICTCHER IN MY MAIL

-- RAYAN (taekoff@yahoo.fr), May 19, 2002.

Dear Christian, A great shot and a quite beautiful one at that. I read some of the other comments after carefully looking at your photo. Yeah, it maybe a little too polarized, but I really like the effect. If you meant to do this, then congrates, if not, then I would call it a happy accident. I would be proud to hang this photo on any of my walls. Take care, Jody.

-- Jody S. Davis (jodysdavis@yahoo.com), June 24, 2002.


If it is worth doing, is it worth overdoing. Nice shot, however go easy on the polarizer.

-- robert krasznai (amberpax@prodigy.net), September 28, 2002.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ