Chemtrail Comics

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Unk's Troll-free Private Saloon : One Thread

Been out fishing for 30 hours and all we could come up with was a 9” lobster (a first for me off standard ocean tackle). So, I decided to seek some online humor at Olson’s freak show and what should appear but this laugh-filled thread:

http://www.timebomb2000.com/vb/showthread.php?s=b62cc6a531d582c231c6a073afce3cfa&threadid=19837

Am I the only one who finds these morons somewhat disturbing? This Stu dude is easy to explain but the rest of them should join him in lock-up before they hurt themselves.

-- So (cr@t.es), January 27, 2002

Answers

Molson...is that you?

You do realize that chemtrails were spotted off the coast of California, don't you? Right off of some town called Newport. You weren't close to that I hope. Oh my...30 hours of breathing those toxic chemtrails. I shudder to think....

-- (regular@timebomb.poster), January 28, 2002.


"Am I the only one who finds these morons somewhat disturbing?"

I rarely even read much from that forum, and when I do it doesn't bother me at all.

I am more inclined to think that it is you who are disturbed, since you intentionally read about ideas which disturb you, then you come to another forum to discuss them even more.

-- (look@in.mirror), January 28, 2002.


Well they must be spraying Washington, DC today. There were contrails all over the sky this morning.

;)

-- Buddy (buddydc@go.com), January 28, 2002.


No, it wasn't me - a 9" lobster? Isn't that a crayfish?

The chemtrail kooks are working themselves up into quite a lather though...

-- Dennis Molson (dennismolson@hotmail.com), January 28, 2002.


Why yes ‘look@in.mirror’, I am quite disturbed. The fact that I would take the time to speak to you is certain confirmation.

Molson, the Blue Lobster actually looks more like a crayfish but a lobster it is.

-- So (cr@t.es), January 28, 2002.



"Why yes ‘look@in.mirror’, I am quite disturbed."

Good, glad you finally got that straight. You may now continue making an ass of yourself.

-- lol (look@in.mirror), January 28, 2002.


So:

It is my experience that the seafood doesn't know the rules of civilized fishing. From last Sept, fishing with a salmon spoon, my catch by number went: Dungeness #1, Ling Cod #2, Salmon #3. Why a crab would grab a spoon with no bait escapes me. I think we should start a school for them so they can learn the rules. :o)))

Best Wishes,,,,

Z

-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), January 28, 2002.


There is now a bill introduced by 107th Congress mentions chemtrails and particle beams, electromagnetic radiation, plasma, or extremely low frequency (ELF) or ultra low frequency (ULF) energy radiation, and it mentions mind-control.

Read it yourself: Go here: thomas.loc.gov/home/c107query.html

and type in Chemtrails in the search box.

This essentially boils down to the 107th Congress acknowledging there is such a thing as chemtrails.

www.house.gov/kucinich/

QUOTE FROM LINK: Space Preservation Act of 2001 (Introduced in the House) HR 2977 IH 107th CONGRESS, 1st Session H. R. 2977

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

October 2, 2001

Mr. KUCINICH introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Science, and in addition to the Committees on Armed Services, and International Relations, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To preserve the cooperative, peaceful uses of space for the benefit of all humankind by permanently prohibiting the basing of weapons in space by the United States, and to require the President to take action to adopt and implement a world treaty banning space-based weapons.

~~~~~~~~~~~`

chemtrails are mentioned in Section 7, 2 B ii

I would like to know from the author what is the Congress's definition of that word "chemtrails" in this document :-)

I thought that was water vapor ha!

let's all contact our respective reps and say...how about supporting this bill...after you tell your constituents what those "chemtrails" thingies are and why they are in a bill about WEAPONS??!?!?!?

-- (copy@nd.paste), January 29, 2002.


Hmm...Your tinfoil hat seems to be slipping...back to fatolsonland where this sort of nonsense is appreciated...

-- Dennis Molson (dennismolson@hotmail.com), January 29, 2002.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ