Scurrilous attack on NAMBLA

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Unk's Wild Wild West : One Thread

NAMBLA

-- (Scoutmaster_Bob@pink_pup.tent), June 01, 2001

Answers

It would be real "nice" to see the membership list of that organization. That's a group of folks that need to be put to sleep.

-- libs are idiots (moreinterpretation@ugly.com), June 01, 2001.

Definitely some of our society's SICKEST individuals!!!

Hopefully, not our Socr@tes.....

Deano

-- Deano (deano@luvthebeach.com), June 01, 2001.


From the story.

The good news is that NAMBLA has been a pariah organization even among gay-rights activists. The bad news is that it has recently acquired a prominent defender, the American Civil Liberties Union.

-- Good (news@bad.news), June 01, 2001.


NAMBLA is definately a sick organization. I saw the article as a way for the author to attack the ACLU by association. Pretty sad all the way around. I wonder if dumbya was a victom of NAMBLA? You know cause he likes to rape us all in our butts.

-- Tony Baloney (Fuck the@repugs.com), June 01, 2001.

Lowering it from 18 to 14 would obviously do nothing to liberate 10-year-olds, and NAMBLA wants no child left behind,especially no male child.

Sick bastards. I had read something about this a while back, it is horrible. I haven't liked the ACLU for a LONG time, they defend some people they shouldn't and this is the worse. When so called freedom overrides such basic moral standards, then freedom needs to be limited!

-- Cherri (jessam5@home.com), June 01, 2001.



I rarely do the pay-to-view thing.

However if the ACLU and Judicial Watch ever sue each other, I would pay the $19.95 to watch. Maybe the WWF dude or Don King can set it up?

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), June 01, 2001.


Here is NAMBLA's website. I haven't gone in, I don't think I could stomach it. NAMBLA.



-- Cherri (jessam5@home.com), June 01, 2001.


NAMBLA is just another by-product of a free society. Like everything else in our world, freedom comes with a price tag and allowing degenerates such as this to exist in a public arena is but one.

When we refuse to draw lines than there can be no boundaries.

Deano, after reading this article I may never use this handle again.

-- So (cr@t.es), June 01, 2001.


Seeking

GWM, 38, seeks virgin boy, 10-12 for sharing toys, fun times, dressing up and love. Let me intoduce you to an exotic world of pleasure.

-- (Scoutmaster_Bob@troop.69), June 01, 2001.


Yes, it sounds bad, but face it, the newer and more objective studies do NOT show any long-term effects on children from pedophilia.

You might disagree with their lifestyle, but that doesn't make it wrong.

-- Tarzan the Ape Man (tarzan@swingingthroughthejunglewithouta.net), June 01, 2001.



Sorry, no, I did not write that. Just for the record, I am offended by the goals of NAMBLA, but so long as its members refrain from engaging in sexual contact with boys, they can lobby for whatever they want. Lobbying doesn't mean they will be successful, but they do have the freedom to advocate whatever they want, no matter how offended I or anyone else may be by what they advocate.

You have the freedom to advocate adults having sex with kids, but you don't have the freedom to actually engage in it.

-- Tarzan the Ape Man (tarzan@swingingthroughthejunglewithouta.net), June 01, 2001.


I am not Tarzan!

-- (dudesy@37.com), June 02, 2001.

Assuming that the usage of the word "scurrilous" is "slander", is it really possible to slander an organization like this?

-- (it.boggles@the.mind), June 02, 2001.


"Yes, it sounds bad, but face it, the newer and more objective studies do NOT show any long-term effects on children from pedophilia. You might disagree with their lifestyle, but that doesn't make it wrong. "

Whoever wrote it knows who they are, and is a degenerated, sick, SICK ASSHOLE!!!!

-- libs are idiots (moreinterpretation@ugly.com), June 03, 2001.


Cmon LAI, the person who wrote that was not a Lib, he was a troll tryimg to sound Tarzanesque.

-- Lars (larsguy@yahoo.com), June 03, 2001.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ