BUSH CHASED OUT OF FRESNO

George W. Bush, Governor of Texas, Resident of the White House came to Fresno today and was quickly chased out of town by angry protesters. Bush had originally planned to stay the night in Fresno. He was probably thinking that he would be safe in the conservative Central Valley. Obviously, he couldn't visit the Bay Area - he would have been tarred and feathered. But, in the days prior to his visit, plans were made to protest his arrival, the hotel where he would be staying, and any other event he would be attending.

The prospect of his being greeted by big protests everywhere he appeared while in Fresno was not what his public relations team had in mind when they selected his visit to this area. Bush stayed less than 30 minutes and never left the heavily guarded airport.

One local radio station (KMJ) reported that almost the entire Fresno Police department was on the scene to protect him. Protesters held signs and chanted as Bush left his plane and boarded a helicopter headed for Sequoia National Park.

Demonstrators will follow Dubya to Sequoia National Park on Wednesday. Standing in front of a beautiful forest can't hide his plans to open our National Monuments to logging, grazing, and mining. Visiting California's natural treasures won't convince us that drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge is anything less than a disaster waiting to happen.

Bush can easily pose in front of our sequoias, but what California really needs is a commitment to protect our beautiful places and solve our energy problems with a wise and sustainable energy strategy.

-- Not welcome here (chased@away.com), May 30, 2001

Answers

what's the source?

-- libs are idiots (moreinterpretation@ugly.com), May 30, 2001.

Ever been to Fresno? Looks like the President’s luck is holding up well.

-- Telinet (like@it.is), May 30, 2001.

"ever been to Fresno"?

Too funny. Big deal, Fresno!

Only the BIGGEST freaking Agricultural county on the entire freaking planet. Plenty of rich folks there. Gee maybe this is why the Dukes of Hazzard chose to visit it? Little do they know MOST Americans are not buying stupidasses crap, not ANY of it. Even folks WITH cash are not buying this BS administration.

All this with a Press which will not show ANYTHING which even comes close to the truth. Look even Right Wing nuts like Judicial Watch ain't buying Dubya, why are you?

-- (pinhe@d.detector), May 30, 2001.

Where's the link?

Maybe the right wing believes Bush is too far left. I certainly do.

-- libs are idiots (moreinterpretation@ugly.com), May 30, 2001.

Maybe the right wing believes Bush is too far left. I certainly do.

-- libs are idiots (moreinterpretation@ugly.com), May 30, 2001.

NO!! YOU didn't say that did you? After picking myself off of the floor where I fell when I read what you wrote I decided to ask if you had really said that. Did you? Is there hope for the minds of people in this country?

-- Cherri (jessam5@home.com), May 30, 2001.

Pinhead detector--

I would wager that you are a politically correct person. I doubt if you misuse the N word or the C word, etc. But you think it is funny to refer to certain others as "pinheads". Do you know what a microcephalic is? Do you know anyone with this disability in their family? Do you consider it a character defect?

p inheads and microcephalics

-- (Paracelsus@Pb.Au), May 30, 2001.

Ok how does the new moniker grab you?

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), May 30, 2001.

OK libs are idiots, I got your link for ya. Took some searching but finally found it, whew! Unfortunately due to National Security reasons, the CIA had to change the names and places so as not to tip- off Bin Laden to GW's real location, you can understand that, right?

Bu sh Chased Out of Fresno!

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), May 30, 2001.

twofaced.scum,

You wrote, "Even folks WITH cash are not buying this BS administration".

Actually, I have cash - lots of it - and I am pretty much fully buying into what this administration is doing.

By the way, your misuse of "stupidasses crap" is hilarious. It is very rewarding to watch a liberal demonstrate his ignorance of the language as he tries to call someone else stupid. LOL.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), May 30, 2001.

Pinhe@d, you certainly have named yourself well. The large AG industry that surrounds the Fresno area is owned and operated by huge corporations, the very folks that put GWB in the White House. The Fresno protesters are another group altogether and should not be confused with the upwardly mobile sector of our society. For that matter, they should not be confused with legal residents of the United States.

Get It?

-- Telinet (like@it.is), May 30, 2001.

"Actually, I have cash - lots of it - and I am pretty much fully buying into what this administration is doing."

FYI, having lots of the script printed by the Montana Freemen does NOT mean that you're rich.

-- Afraid of J's Militia (afraid@of.J), May 30, 2001.

You are afraid of your own shadow, pinhead.

-- Proud Member of J's Militia (cry@yourself.asleep), May 30, 2001.

Sorry, I don't want to become "collateral damage".

-- Afraid of J's Militia (afraid@of.J), May 30, 2001.

J has a militia?

-- (dayum@gina.), May 30, 2001.

Yeah, that's why he thinks so highly of Tim McVeigh.

-- Afraid of J's Militia (afraid@of.J), May 30, 2001.

Typical. Van't deal with the issues so you go on a personal attack.

-- Proud Member of J's Militia (white@power.forever), May 30, 2001.

Pointing out that Montana Freeman Money isn't real money is hardly a personal attack.

-- Afraid of J's Militia (afraid@of.J), May 30, 2001.

LOL!

Montana Freemen script, now that's funny. I don't think that I have ever seen a liberal with a sense of humor before. Usually they are too busy whining about the injustice of it all to make any jokes.

By the way, are you always going to post under the handle, "Afraid of J's Militia"? Because the only thing better than having my own run-of-the-mill troll, is having my own troll with a cool handle. LOL!

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), May 30, 2001.

I don't think that I have ever seen a liberal with a sense of humor before. Usually they are too busy whining about the injustice of it all to make any jokes.

Jeez, J. Give me a break, will ya? I'm probably the most liberal person on this forum. I have no sense of humor? I'm too busy whining about the injustice of it all? Well, gall dern. Just hook me up and drag me behind a truck. I DO live here in Texas, and that's the way folks deal with dissidents in this state. [and if you believe THAT one, I'll tell you another one.]

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), May 31, 2001.

Anita,

No offense intended.

I know that you view yourself as very liberal, but I have always viewed many of the more vocal leftists on this forum to be quite a bit more radical in their views than you are. Maybe it is just because you aren't so beligerent in the way that you present your views.

By the way, your joke wasn't funny. : )

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), May 31, 2001.

Bush@twofaced.scum,

you seem determined to identify yourself as a freak of nature.

some more ideas here.

-- (Paracelsus@Pb.Au), May 31, 2001.

Since you are concerned about the labels Par, how about we ask J to define what a Liberal is?

Apparently his definition is a tad off. Might help many of us to understand "self". Be a real service to folks. Help in the liberating process we are told is so vital to a healthy life.

So J, ya game?

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), May 31, 2001.

And why don't we ask you to define what an anomynous coward is.

-- I'm too scared to use the same handle too much (just@like.you), May 31, 2001.

Now you've done it Anita. Don't be surprised when the Rev. Al Sharpton shows up at your front door demanding justice. LOL!

-- jammy (jammin@with.jammy), May 31, 2001.

After some of the extreme things J has said, like saying that the government workers in Oklahoma deserved to die and that Eric Rudolph and Timothy McVeigh are patriots, I have to agree with the other posters who don't want J to know who they are. There's plenty of people on this board that I think might be a little unstable, but J's the only one who might actually do something about it. Anyone who could look at the aftermath of Oklahoma City and call it an act of patriotism is capable of pretty much anything, IMHO.

I would actually sleep better at night if I believed J was Dennis Olson, since Dennis has a pressure valve now.

-- I'm Worried About J Too (also@worried.about.J), May 31, 2001.

I don't think I've ever seen a liberal with a sense of humor before either. When I tell them that I have only voted Democrat once they tend to get very hot under the collar.

-- Afraid of J's Militia (afaid@of.J), May 31, 2001.

If J said that Timothy McVeigh is a patriot then he is way wrong but I won't believe he said it till I see a link.

BTW, McVeigh is getting sympathy from the arch Leftist, arch anti-American Gore Vidal.

-- (de@th.to_McVeigh), May 31, 2001.

various anonymous cowards,

This is the problem when you cowardly cretins post under ever-changing handles; I can't keep track of who is who.

To the poster who believes that I am lurking in the bushes with a sniper rifle (LOL), I don't expect you to use your full name, address, and social security number, for I surely don't. It would, however, be nice if all of you would use a consistent handle so that you can become known entities on the board, instead of some losers who have nothing better to offer than snide comments posted from a cowardly, ever-changing, handle-of-the-moment.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), May 31, 2001.

Death-

He's called McVeigh a patriot several times. It would be easy to do a source search on Google. I have the link at home and if you can't find it I'll post it tonight.

J-

Nice try. However, after seeing several posters get "outed" during the various incarnations of the board I prefer to not put something as valuable as the life of myself and my family in the hands of Phil Greenspun.

-- Afraid of J's Militia (afraid@of.J), May 31, 2001.

I tried a search on Google and could not find the J comment you reference. I don't say it's not there, only that I couldn't find it. Post the link if you are ever so inclined.

Here is a link to the Gore Vidal story.

-- (de@th.to_McVeigh), May 31, 2001.

Oh look, it's an anonymous troll! For your information, my name is J, not Y2J. Secondly, although this guy would be totally justified in blowing the Massachusettes Supreme Judician Court sky-high and dancing in the blood of these traitorous despots, that's exactly the sort of action that gets good patriots jailed and eventually executed.

The best thing for this guy to do is to just disappear quietly into the woods, a la Eric Rudolph. No one will notice if there's one less waiter in the Boston metro area. He should leave the bombing to the real experts.

God bless Timothy McVeigh.

88

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), May 01, 2001.

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), May 31, 2001.

Good thing J uses the same handle everytime. Makes finding his dribble child's play.

Now J, care to respond? Or have we chased you out of Unks?

BTW sir, and I think I speak for many here, FUCK YOU.

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), May 31, 2001.

Give me a break! Everyone knows that J is just another right wing punk repug fucking loser. I cannot believe you whiners, "I'm afraid of J's militia!" The only thing you need to be afraid of us legitimizing anything that fucking repug losers like J write. He's a major league moron just like that back-stabbing commie dumbya!

-- Tony Baloney (Fuck the@repugs.com), May 31, 2001.

J

Death to Timothy McVeigh

-- (de@th.to_McVeigh), May 31, 2001.

Tony,

I love you. When can we meet?

-- (DFD@WW.West), May 31, 2001.

ha ha ha ha

Glad I dropped out of this thread way back...

-- libs are idiots (moreinterpretation@ugly.com), May 31, 2001.

Afraid of J's Militia,

LOL! Are you saying that you aren't smart enough to be using an anonymizer when you come to this board? Do you think that I would risk my family's well being any more than you would?

Regardless, if you continue to change your handle you are doing nothing to protect your identity; you are merely being cowardly.



twofaced.scum,

That was not me that made that post. You may know this, and are just trying to be malicious, but in all likelihood, you are just too dumb to have read the whole thread and realized that the same troll posted both the 'Y2J' post & the fake 'J' reply. Follow the link to the thread, and then scroll down to the end of the thread. Note that I know how to spell 'Massachusetts'. The ignorant troll did not.

Chase me out of Unk's? LOL! A slimy little coward like you could never chase me out of my favorite cyber-hangout. Now run along, or you'll be late to work. Don't forget to ask each customer if he or she would like fries with his or her meal.



Tiny Baloney,

Ah yes, the forum's resident potty mouth. Here's a hint for you: your foul language only impresses the other low class losers that you associate with, not those of us that actually contribute to society. Now run along, or you'll miss Jerry Springer.



de@th.to McVeigh,

Read the whole thread that twofaced.scum linked to. You will see that someone (who couldn't spell 'Massachusetts') was posing as me.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), May 31, 2001.

Wow, I can't believe you actually said that. It's hard to believe you actually claim to be a Christian. Shame on you!

-- Polly Wanna Cracker (polly@wanna.cracker), May 31, 2001.

So is it safe to assume you don't think Timothy McVeigh is a hero?

-- (anonymous@coward.troll), May 31, 2001.

I wouldn't go that far, Anonymous Coward Troll. I think that anyone who takes a stand for their country is deserving of the title of patriot. I would say that killing government workers is generally unadvisable but given the abuses that occured at Ruby Ridge and Waco, I think it's clear that McVeigh felt he had no choice. The only regret he should have is that so many children were killed.

By the way, I love your name.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), May 31, 2001.

J, you write that "the only regret [McVeigh] should have is thatso many children were killed"??!?!?

And that it is "generally unadvisable to kill government workers"????!!?

The only conclusion I can draw from this is that you think if somewhat fewer children had been killed, McVeigh should have no regrets whatever and that it is occasionally advisable to kill government workers.

What the hell are you smoking?

-- Little Nipper (canis@minor.net), May 31, 2001.

Ted Kacinzky is a real hero

-- Y2J scares me (he@is.dangerous), May 31, 2001.

I can't get no, satisfackshun

I can't get no, satisfackshun

Here in Fresno

ain't no ackshun

And I try, and I try, and I try, and I try

I can't get no, (oh baby)

satisfachshun

-- (Mack_Jigger@rolling.stone), May 31, 2001.

Polly,

Evidently remedial English has been a tough class for you these past several years.



Little Nipper,

Here is another conclusion that you could draw: the outrageous post above was not done by me, but by some troll posing as me. He does a decent job copying my writing style, but there are obvious clues that it is not me.

For instance, I would never capitalize 'Anonymous Coward Troll', especially if I were responding to someone who used that handle with no capitalization. Also, I know how to spell the word, 'occurred'. There are other differences, but just in case the cretin is capable of learning, I will leave it at that.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), June 01, 2001.

"By the way", NOBODY is buying your explanation J.

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), June 01, 2001.

occurred vs. occured

Looks more like a typo than a spelling problem to me.

-- Polly Wanna Cracker (polly@wanna.cracker), June 01, 2001.

twofaced.scum,

It's so nice of you to speak for the entire forum. Idiot.


Polly,

Do you mean like the typo in the other thread when the troll misspelled the word 'Massachusetts'?

Twice?

LOL.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), June 01, 2001.

Yes, that's exactly what I meant.

Just like your misspelling of the word "possession" on this thread.

http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=005LsO

And your misspelling of the word "belligerent" earlier in this very thread.

It's easy to drop a letter or two, isn't it, J? How interesting that you seized on these errors as proof that you didn't actually make the posts attributed to you, yet you yourself have made similar errors quite recently.

I noticed that while you were busy attacking the English abilities of the alleged imposter, you have yet to state what your opinion of Timothy McVeigh actually is. Unless, of course, you already have.

-- Polly Wanna Cracker (polly@wanna.cracker), June 01, 2001.

Polly,

It hurts to see my spelling mistakes of 'possession' and 'belligerent' thrust back into the spotlight, but that is exactly what they are - spelling mistakes - not typographical errors. This does not change the fact that I know how to correctly spell the words 'occurred' and 'Massachusetts'. While the mistake, 'occured' could have been a typo, the odds of one accidentally adding an 'e' to the word 'Massachusetts' between the 't' and the 's' (twice, no less) are very long, indeed.

Regardless, if I had typed those troll posts that painted McVeigh in such a wonderful light, why would I then, in the same thread, make a post that clearly showed that I hadn't authored the troll posts?

McVeigh is no hero.

It is not considered politically correct to point this out, but as I have said before, there would never have been an OKC if there had not first been a Waco. It is correct to be outraged at what happened in OKC. My amazement is at the lack of outrage over what happened in Waco. I guess that the mass media has succeeded in brainwashing the public.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), June 01, 2001.

"I guess that the mass media has succeeded in brainwashing the public."

Ya think?

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), June 01, 2001.

"Regardless, if I had typed those troll posts that painted McVeigh in such a wonderful light, why would I then, in the same thread, make a post that clearly showed that I hadn't authored the troll posts?"

No offense, but how do I know who's the real J and who isn't? How do I know you didn't really post the previous post on this thread and I'm talking to a troll. For that matter, how do I know you didn't post your actual opinion on McVeigh and then decide you regretted it? After all, on at least one post, when someone (Tarzan? LN?) asked you if you thought the government workers in Oklahoma were deserving of death you got very coy and asked if the poster you were responding to wanted you to break the law. I think that's when you said it was merely unadvisable to kill government workers.

I notice this same coyness in your last post to me. You continually temper your criticism of McVeigh with the specters of Waco and Ruby Ridge, as though McVeigh were somehow balancing the scales when he slaughterd so many innocents. That you seem to espouse this idea while claiming to be a believer certainly gives me pause. It's as though you've forgoten to whom vengeance belongs. Romans 12:19.

-- Polly Wanna Cracker (polly@wanna.cracker), June 01, 2001.

Polly,

The imposter trolls can definitely muddy the waters around here, but I don't have a solution to that problem, other than to refute them when I see them.

My coy response was to Tarzan, I believe, and what I was trying to convey was that if a government agent tries to illegally take your life, then I believe that you are justified in taking his, if necessary, to protect yours. Specifically, when the ATF opened fire on the church in Waco, I believe that the members were justified in taking life to protect life. Nonetheless, it is unadvisable to do so, even when fully justifiable, because the court system (read: government) rarely sides against the government (read: itself) in such cases.

I am not trying to temper criticism of McVeigh, but only trying to make sure that the federal government gets their fair share of criticism over Waco and Ruby Ridge, as well. Rarely do I see critics of McVeigh criticise the federal government for the murders at Ruby Ridge, or the massacre at Waco. Chalk that up to the excellent job of brainwashing that the mass media accomplishes on the public, I suppose.

The reality is that the OKC tragedy did not happen in a vacuum; it was preceded by Ruby Ridge and Waco. I am not saying that the scales were somehow balanced, or that vengeance is not still the Lord's. It appears, however, that Timothy McVeigh must have believed otherwise. For pointing out this somewhat obvious fact, I have been viciosly attacked on this forum. Chalk that up to the rampant growth of politically correct thought, I suppose.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), June 01, 2001.

MILLIONS of us were outraged by Waco, even me, who wasn't? Where are even ONE OTHER of the outraged bombing Federal Buildings?

Your theory is bs. Simple odds say it is bs. McVeigh is a nutball and Waco had zero if anything to do with it.

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), June 01, 2001.

A good answer, J, but too clever by half I'm afraid.

"I am not trying to temper criticism of McVeigh, but only trying to make sure that the federal government gets their fair share of criticism over Waco and Ruby Ridge, as well."

So the government brought it on themselves, eh? Ridiculous.

"Rarely do I see critics of McVeigh criticise the federal government for the murders at Ruby Ridge, or the massacre at Waco. Chalk that up to the excellent job of brainwashing that the mass media accomplishes on the public, I suppose."

You rarely see Ruby Ridge and Waco brought up because despite McVeigh's twisted rational (which you seem to have bought into wholesale), abuses by one branch of government do not excuse the wholesale slaughter of 160 + innocents. Nothing the government did justifies the death and destruction that occured in Oklahoma that day. Nothing. The only thing Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma City have in common is that they were all terrible, senseless tragedies.

This is such a simple concept I don't understand why it escapes you.

"The reality is that the OKC tragedy did not happen in a vacuum; it was preceded by Ruby Ridge and Waco. I am not saying that the scales were somehow balanced, or that vengeance is not still the Lord's. It appears, however, that Timothy McVeigh must have believed otherwise. For pointing out this somewhat obvious fact, I have been viciosly attacked on this forum. Chalk that up to the rampant growth of politically correct thought, I suppose."

As far as I can tell, you have been viciously attacked on this forum for attempting to justify the Oklahoma City bombing, however obliquely. I believe that it is wrong to argue and attack other people. However, you would do well to remember Proverbs 15:1 "1 A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger."

Now ponder that for a time and consider whether the words you posted earlier are soft or harsh.

-- Polly Wanna Cracker (polly@wanna.cracker), June 01, 2001.

Funny. I read this:

I would say that killing government workers is generally unadvisable but given the abuses that occured at Ruby Ridge and Waco, I think it's clear that McVeigh felt he had no choice.

And then I read this:

I am not trying to temper criticism of McVeigh, but only trying to make sure that the federal government gets their fair share of criticism over Waco and Ruby Ridge, as well. Rarely do I see critics of McVeigh criticise the federal government for the murders at Ruby Ridge, or the massacre at Waco.

It sure sounds like you're saying almost the same thing that your "troll" is saying. Ignore all the horrible pictures from Oklahoma. They wouldn't exist at all if it hadn't been for the government's actions at Ruby Ridge and Waco.

Try this on for size. Those vicious attacks you've received didn't happen in a vacuum. They were preceeded by your pitiful attempts to justify the bombing of the Oklahoma City Federal Building.

-- Troll Spotter (troll@spott.er), June 01, 2001.

Scratch that. You also said:

The reality is that the OKC tragedy did not happen in a vacuum; it was preceded by Ruby Ridge and Waco. I am not saying that the scales were somehow balanced, or that vengeance is not still the Lord's. It appears, however, that Timothy McVeigh must have believed otherwise.

This is exactly what your "troll" said. Tim McVeigh was "forced" into bombing Oklahoma City by Waco and Ruby Ridge.

-- Troll Spotter (troll@spott.er), June 01, 2001.

twofaced.scum,

So it takes at least two people to react the same way to a stimulus before that stimulus can actually be the reason for a person doing something? LOL. You are priceless. Pretty close to senseless, too, but definitely priceless.


Polly,

You wrote, "So the government brought it on themselves, eh? Ridiculous". No, it does not appear that Timothy McVeigh thought that it was ridiculous at all. In fact, it appears that he precisely felt that the government had brought it upon themselves.

You also wrote, "You rarely see Ruby Ridge and Waco brought up because despite McVeigh's twisted rational (sic) (which you seem to have bought into wholesale), abuses by one branch of government do not excuse the wholesale slaughter of 160+ innocents. Nothing the government did justifies the death and destruction that occured (sic) in Oklahoma that day. Nothing. The only thing Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma City have in common is that they were all terrible, senseless tragedies".

Again, I never said that OKC was excusable or justifiable because of Ruby Ridge and Waco, but is is obvious that Timothy McVeigh thought differently. In fact, "this is such a simple concept, I don't understand why it escapes you". The fact is that the actions of our own government against our own citizens caused one certain citizen to snap and to do the unthinkable. I don't approve of it. I don't applaud it. But I am smart enough to realize it, and I am honest enough to say it.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), June 01, 2001.

Why is Polly so interested in continuing this conversation after it has been exhausted. Is he/she the troll imitating J?

-- things that make (you@go.Hmmm!), June 01, 2001.

If J was a Chris Rock fan, he might paraphrase him

It's wrong to blow up a building full of government workers. But I understand!

Disgusting.

-- Lay Down (on@the.couch), June 01, 2001.

Except that J hasn't yet and won't ever say that it was wrong to blow up all those people. Whatever he's been smoking I don't want any of it. When I go to the ATM tonight I won't be looking over my shoulder for the media, I'll be looking over my shoulder for J.

-- Chris Rock (chris.rock@comedy.ha), June 01, 2001.

things that make you@go.Hmmm!,

I would not go so far as to say that Polly is and was the imposter troll. I did notice that, even after our discussion on the spelling of certain words, that he or she misspelled 'occurred' in his or her last post. In fact, he or she misspelled it in exactly the same way that the imposter troll did. Of course, it might just be coincidence, or even a typographical error.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), June 01, 2001.

things that make = J

-- (dudesy@37.com), June 01, 2001.

Polly also misspelled the words criticize, rationale, and viciously. Meanwhile, you used the word is twice in succession. What could all this mean?

Sometimes people misspell words when they are in a hurry to type. This is a human trait, not confined to only a few particular posters. I suspect you know this, but since Polly's post cut a little too close to home, you have chosen to once again attack the messenger rather than attack the message. Surprise, surprise.

There's a pattern to your posting, J. When you are having a rough time with an argument, you tend to make personal attacks rather than answering your opponent. You'll call them names, imply things about their sexuality, even accuse them of being other posters all in an effort to switch focus away from the topic at hand. Hopefully Polly has noticed this, too, and won't be fooled into answering your personal attack.

On a final note, after having been accused of being Dennis Olson for so long, I would have thought you wouldn't be so quick to engage in this sort of under-handed tactic. It looks like I have over estimated your character.

-- Spell Czecher (spell.czecher@test.cz), June 01, 2001.

dudesy = wrong


Spell Czecher,

Are you for real? I have addressed all of Polly's points in a straightforward manner. How is it that I have attacked him or her?

I honestly responded to, things that make you@go.Hmmm!, when I said that I had noticed Polly's same misspelling of the word 'occurred'. I also pointed out that it might be a coincidence or a typographical error. Is that the supposed attack?

There are patterns to my posting, Spell Czecher. I don't like anonymous cowards who won't use a consistent handle. I am civil when posters are civil with me, and when posters are routinely rude, then I grant them no quarter. I also am quick to forgive and return to civility when a poster does the same. Witness my recent responses to Tony Baloney since he has cleaned up the vulgarities in his posts.

As far as your claims against me go, you must forgive me if they fall upon deaf ears. For firstly, I feel that they are unfounded, and secondly, I have never before seen your handle here.

Therefore, at this point in time, your estimation of my character means nothing whatsoever to me. If you are still here a month from now, and still posting as Spell Czecher, then that will quite likely change.

-- J (Y2J@home.comm), June 01, 2001.

Spell Czecher = Absolutely Correct

Hope you don't play poker, J. Then again, if I was your neighbor, I'd hope you did :-)

-- (they@re.predictable), June 01, 2001.

I'm in love with Janet Reno.

-- (dudesy@37.com), June 02, 2001.

as well as Robert Redford.

-- (dudesy@37.com), June 02, 2001.

ROTFL, the coward is accusing J of attacking the messenger instead of the message. The same coward who changes his handle after every post. ROTFL.

-- dudesy (dudesy@37.com), June 02, 2001.

I am not Spell Czecher (aka the coward).

-- Absolutely Correct (I@always.am), June 02, 2001.

J stick to talking about the Market. Beyond that you sound like a pussy.

-- (bush@twofaced.scum), June 02, 2001.

Pot calling the kettle black.

-- You really are a (two@faced.scum), June 02, 2001.