real or memorex?

greenspun.com : LUSENET : Unk's Wild Wild West : One Thread

Due to the fact that most people on this forum are over 40, there seems to be a general concensus that if any young beautiful woman has beautiful breasts, they must be fake. How about these?

I'll bet dollars to donuts they are real.

-- booby fan (fan@of.boobs), January 26, 2001

Answers

I notice ther has been quite a delay in responding. When you guys are finished pounding your puppies, please add your 2 cents.

-- booby fan (lol@hot.stuff), January 26, 2001.

Live.

Sorry, but with this handle how could I not respond.

-- Monkey Spanker (monkeyspanker0@angelfie.com), January 26, 2001.


I need a closer look.

-- KoFE (your@town.USA), January 26, 2001.

Have her lay on her back and I'll tell you for sure, but my vast experience tells me that "they" have been enhanced. Notice the clear line at the top of the breast indicating a high "jutt factor". A high "jutt factor" at the top of the natural breast is associated with push-up bras, not filmy teddies. Enhanced breasts have a high "jutt factor" irrespective of underbreast support, thus I am forced to conclude that the woman in question has a saline filling.

-- Uncle Deedah (unkeed@yahoo.com), January 26, 2001.

Due to the fact that most people on this forum are over 40, there seems to be a general concensus that if any young beautiful woman has beautiful breasts, they must be fake. How about these?

Waves and Points finger Directly at screen.....

I AM NOT OVER 40, um, yet.

Bangs head on desk in relief.

Gotz one more year to go to get to the damn 40 hill.

-- sumer (shh@aol.con), January 26, 2001.



Unk, you need to get out more often. They got these things built into them Teddies now that prop those pretties right up there for easier viewing. Think that's what we got happening here.

-- (slight pressure jutt factor @ not. fake), January 26, 2001.

"I'll bet dollars to donuts they are real."

I will be happy to hold the stakes until the winner of this bet is determined.

-- Little Nipper (canis@minor.net), January 26, 2001.


Who cares??? Ya wouldn't throw her out of the bed for eatin' crackers,she's a good lookin woman no matter,it's all flesh on the exterior.But I might question her philosophies.

-- capnfun (capnfun1@excite.com), January 26, 2001.

Don't be deceived. She is a lizard alien.

-- (Paracelsus@Pb.Au), January 27, 2001.

PETA... People Eat Tastey Animals.

After that picture this acronym has taken on a whole new dimension!

-- Will (righthere@home.com), January 27, 2001.



How about this one?



-- booby fan (must feel @ to. be sure), January 28, 2001.


Unc, you are obviously an expert and I concur with your analysis!

Booby, they look more natural than the others and quite possibly are unenhanced.

The bottom line is --- we love em all!!!

-- Barry Seal (BS@luv.them.boobies), January 28, 2001.


Subject II, while exhibiting a high "jutt factor", is likely natural, but without full tactile examination of the subject the verdict must remain somewhat inconclusive. Notice the pinching effect at the interior lower portion of the exposed breast. This pinching effect is indicative of a highly engineered underwire bra. The other clue that leads to my conclusion of possible natural breasts displayed to their utmost advantage through science, is the fact that the breasts in question are too close to the center of the subject's ribcage. This centering effect is caused by the engineered bra's concentration of breast mass in the "clevage zone".

-- Uncle Deedah (unkeed@yahoo.com), January 28, 2001.

Subject #1 looks a bit like Liz Hurley. Could it indeed be her? I think that she got a boob job a while back.

-- Barry Seal (BS@babes.&.boobs.forever), January 28, 2001.

Beggars can't be choosers...

-- Uncle Bob (unclb0b@aol.com), January 28, 2001.


That second picture is a photo of Kathryn Harris of Florida about five years ago.

-- Boswell (fundown@thefarm.net), January 28, 2001.

Trying to figure out what boobs have to do with cruelty to animals?

-- Pamela Sue (pamela_sue57@hotmail.com), January 28, 2001.

"Trying to figure out what boobs have to do with cruelty to animals?"

It appears that the woman is offering a reward for those who are not cruel to animals. I promise, if she will come and live with me I will never "spank my monkey" again!

-- no more spanking (yes yes yes @ reward me. please), January 28, 2001.


Am I the only person who thinks that liz hurley isnt all that great looking? hmm

-- (cin@cin.cin), January 28, 2001.

Liz is -->definate eye candy. And I love her accent. And she seems like she has a brain. What else is needed, cin?

-- Bemused (and_amazed@you.people), January 28, 2001.

cin,

Probably.

-- Uncle Deedah (unkeed@yahoo.com), January 28, 2001.


In the face she isn't (I just noticed that...)

-- Uncle Bob (unclb0b@aol.com), January 28, 2001.



-- any thoughts? (looking@for.real.ones), January 28, 2001.





-- second try (look@real.to.me), January 28, 2001.

try try again

-- (cin@cin.cin), January 28, 2001.

No path for the image...img src="alol755i.jpg"

It needs the http://www.yaddayaddayadda.com/alol755i.jpg" to work...

(Just passin' through and thought I'd help out)

-- Uncle Bob (unclb0b@aol.com), January 28, 2001.




-- final (try@then.quit), January 28, 2001.

No reason to be jealous of Liz Hurley Cin, yours are bigger...



-- (tee@hee.hee), January 29, 2001.


OK, I think we need to call in a different expert now....I can't help you with those!

-- Uncle Deedah (unkeed@yahoo.com), January 29, 2001.

ewwwww.

-- sumer (shh@aol.con), January 29, 2001.

How did that lady grow an ass on her chest?

-- genetic engineering? (I@want.one), January 29, 2001.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ