Well, the tax stuff showed up, this should be next. Also, I'm personally convinced that this is the MAIN problem facing America today. Furthermore, the assault on Americans was personally begun by President Klintoon.

The most ask question is: "What is the difference between a Contrail and a Chemtrail?"

This is based on the questions I have been ask via email. A Chemtrail is a lingering contrail that usually expands out to form a cloud that looks much like a normal Cirrus formation but often will form below the normal altitude for Cirrus type clouds. Chemtrails also often have the tell tale oil slick colored light refraction patterns observable through them as you will see in the picture below.

Another reported difference is the fact that Chemtrails are often laid down in deliberate patterns that will resemble a tic-tac-toe, or zigzag pattern often overlapping or intersecting. Many times they form X's as well. Some have been referred to as looking like a plowed field where the sky is carefully covered from horizon to horizon.

Chemtrails also have been reported to have an irritating fallout associated with them that causes illness in persons who are allergic to what ever the materials are that these trails are composed of.

If you have further questions you feel should be placed in this FAQ, or if you do not find the answers you are looking for in the main body of this web site please be sure to check the message boards as they have the most current pictures and reports on this web site.

In case you were wondering, I pulled this from chemtrails.org -- if a website is devoted to them, it's true.

Frank

-- Someone (ChimingIn@twocents.cam), January 02, 2001

Answers

Also, I'm personally convinced that this is the MAIN problem facing America today.

Do you know anyone personally who has been affected by this problem? I'd like to know how you became convinced.

-- (?@?.?), January 02, 2001.

Frank's being facetious.

-- Tarzan the Ape Man (tarzan@swingingthroughthejunglewithouta.net), January 02, 2001.

This is not Frank. It is an agent-provocatueur.

-- (nemesis@awol.com), January 02, 2001.

I was on the forum this afternoon. I noticed right away almost all of the 10 most recently answered threads were about politics and wondered what was going on. Then I noticed this message...

Bush Appoints Four More Fascists to Cabinet

OK, Eve, 'fessin' time. My original post was a troll. I wanted to snag a response from hard righties like "Ain't" and from hard lefties like "welcome your new president" (above). Thank you both, guys. I didn't imagine being sucked into a defense of Socialism. Yuck.

-- (LeonTrotsky@I'm_so_dead.commie), January 02, 2001.

After that I remembered "Tanny" on this thread.

Whether the message starting this thread is by Frank or not, I do smell something fishy going on.

-- just another (long@time.lurker), January 02, 2001.

Nothing fishy, long time lurker.

-- FutureDiggingShockSydBarrettKeep (gray@darkside.moonthink.dirt), January 03, 2001.

I think we should initially be skeptical about any new handle that appears. Let a new handle hang around for awhile before he/she is taken seriously.

It's a different story when someone impersonates another. Frank, is this your post or not? Were you serious or being facetious as Tarz suggests? If serious, maybe you just had a bad day. We all do.

-- Lars (larguy@yahoo.com), January 03, 2001.

If all this "chemtrail" stuff were true then there is only one question:

To What End?

What is the point of making people sick or whatever chemtrails do? Are we not--as a nation--lethargic enough?

Mar.

-- Not now, not like this (AgentSmith0110@aol.com), January 03, 2001.

Lars-

The last line should answer your question.

In case you were wondering, I pulled this from chemtrails.org -- if a website is devoted to them, it's true.

Frank is quite capable of sarcasm, and though he and I disagree on a lot of things, I am absolutely certain he wouldn't have written that last line without planting his tongue firmly in cheek.

-- Tarzan the Ape Man (tarzan@swingingthroughthejunglewithouta.net), January 03, 2001.

Everyone,

Yes, I posted this, and Yes, I was joking. Sheesh. I get grief on every post I make about how "pious" and "critical" I am, I wouldn't think that me posting a "chemtrails" thread would be taken as other than a joke.

OTOH, thanks for looking out for me.

Tarzan, especially thanks, seeings how we're usually at different ends of things.

Frank

P.S. No one here believes in Chemtrails!?!

-- Someone (ChimingIn@twocents.cam), January 03, 2001.

Foe whatever its worth they were laying down a bunch today over Austin Tx...

-- still looking skyward (and still wondering wh@t.they mean), January 03, 2001.

Certainly one of my favorites:

http://www.geocities.com/yakadoo23/oldnew.jpg

-- breathe deep (and@sleep.com), January 03, 2001.

Did anybody read my second post?

As I was driving in this A.M., it occurred to me that *some* people probably thought I was a true chemtrail nut, something which I thought I should correct.

Frank

-- Someone (ChimingIn@twocents.cam), January 04, 2001.

Not sure "believe" is the right word, but last March I saw formations in the sky which struck me as too precise to attribute to coincidence, given the nature of Nature to be chaotic. I attempted to describe this on the Uncensored board, to mixed reactions. I don't claim to know what those "trails" were, or whether they were meant to help or harm, only that they were "meant."

-- David L (bumpkin@dnet.net), January 04, 2001.

David L:

Not to pick at your words, but if you have studied the math [as I was forced to do for technical reasons] chaos is the definition of precision.

Z

-- Z1X4Y7 (Z11X4Y7@aol.com), January 04, 2001.

In other words, David, you didn't see anything of importance because Z didn't. And nothing gets by Z. Now, in the future, if you see anything unusual, you know where to come to check it out.

-- KoFE (your@town.USA), January 04, 2001.

Almost forgot; thanks for clearing that up, Frank.

-- KoFE (your@town.USA), January 04, 2001.

Z, I have not studied the math behind chaos, but my impression was that the "precision" in chaos applies at the macro level, whereas the precision I observed was at the micro level.

-- David L (bumpkin@dnet.net), January 05, 2001.

Z -- perhaps you're being a little too rigid on this subject. Just because something is obviously impossible doesn't mean that you can't believe it. This is the Internet, after all.

KoFE -- and how are you doing, you lovable old tax nut you? In line with my new philosophy, I have set next week aside to believe that the law really does not require that I pay my income taxes. Are you proud of me? So far, this new philosophy of believing in impossible things (at least for a short time) has really paid off. A couple of weeks ago, I set aside a period in which I decided to believe in Santa Claus and was richly rewarded by presents under the tree.

-- E.H.Porter (just.wondering@about.it), January 07, 2001.