Inventor of H-bomb suggested in 1997 that chemtrails be used to reverse global warminggreenspun.com : LUSENET : TB2K spinoff uncensored : One Thread
-- guess we're not nuts after all (@ .), September 11, 2000
Nope, you're still nuts. Fine particulates (generally invisible to the eye) are not Chemtrails.
-- E.H. Porter (Just Wondering@About.it), September 11, 2000.
I knew it, that's exactly what they've been doing. It's too little too late though. The oceans have warmed. In order to stop the acceleration of the current warming trend in time to save the human race they would have to constantly cover the entire sky with dense clouds for many years. This would cause even more problems, like inability to grow crops and oxygen-producing vegetation.
-- (email@example.com), September 11, 2000.
In spite of watering our garden constantly, it is now burned to a crisp. No matter how much you water, when the temperature stays in the high 90s and low 100s for days in a row, and there's no rain, or relief from the blistering sun, then watering just doesn't get it.
Oak trees can stand drought better than most trees, but with the lack of rain for two years, our woods all up and down the highway are filled with dying trees. I wish people would get as excited over our water problems, and heat as they do over damned oil prices. Talk about screwed up priorities!
-- gilda (firstname.lastname@example.org), September 11, 2000.