At Arms [Political] - Historicalgreenspun.com : LUSENET : Countryside : One Thread
I recieved this today. What did our Forefather's think about bearing arms? Here it is.
Thomas Jefferson, of Virginia: "No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms." -- Proposed Virginia Constitution, 1776 "Laws that forbid the carrying of arms. . . disarm only those who are neither inclined nor determined to commit crimes. . . Such laws make things worse for the assaulted and better for the assailants; they serve rather to encourage than to prevent homicides, for an unarmed man may be attacked with greater confidence than an armed man." -- Jefferson's "Commonplace Book," 1774-1776, quoting from On Crimes and Punishment, by criminologist Cesare Beccaria, 1764
George Mason, of Virginia: "[W]hen the resolution of enslaving America was formed in Great Britain, the British Parliament was advised by an artful man, who was governor of Pennsylvania, to disarm the people; that it was the best and most effectual way to enslave them; but that they should not do it openly, but weaken them, and let them sink gradually.". . . I ask, who are the militia? They consist now of the whole people, except a few public officers." -- Virginia's U.S. Constitution ratification convention, 1788 "That the People have a right to keep and bear Arms; that a well regulated Militia, composed of the Body of the People, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe Defence of a free state." -- Within Mason's declaration of "the essential and unalienable Rights of the People," -- later adopted by the Virginia ratification convention, 1788
Samuel Adams, of Massachusetts: "The said Constitution [shall] be never construed to authorize Congress to infringe the just liberty of the press, or the rights of conscience; or to prevent the people of the United States, who are peaceable citizens, from keeping their own arms." -- Massachusetts' U.S. Constitution ratification convention, 1788
William Grayson, of Virginia: "[A] string of amendments were presented to the lower House; these altogether respected personal liberty." -- Letter to Patrick Henry, June 12, 1789, referring to the introduction of what became the Bill of Rights
Richard Henry Lee, of Virginia: "A militia when properly formed are in fact the people themselves . . . and include all men capable of bearing arms. . . To preserve liberty it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms... The mind that aims at a select militia, must be influenced by a truly anti-republican principle." -- Additional Letters >From The Federal Farmer, 1788
James Madison, of Virginia: The Constitution preserves "the advantage of being armed which Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation. . . (where) the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms." -- The Federalist, No. 46
Tench Coxe, of Pennsylvania: "The militia, who are in fact the effective part of the people at large, will render many troops quite unnecessary. They will form a powerful check upon the regular troops, and will generally be sufficient to over-awe them." -- An American Citizen, Oct. 21, 1787 "Who are the militia? Are they not ourselves? Congress have no power to disarm the militia. Their swords and every other terrible implement of the soldier, are the birthright of an American . . . . The unlimited power of the sword is not in the hands of either the federal or state governments, but, where I trust in God it will ever remain, in the hands of the people." -- The Pennsylvania Gazette, Feb. 20, 1788 "As the military forces which must occasionally be raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article (of amendment) in their right to keep and bear their private arms." -- Federal Gazette, June 18, 1789
Noah Webster, of Pennsylvania: "Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe. The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed, and constitute a force superior to any band of regular troops that can be, on any pretence, raised in the United States. A military force, at the command of Congress, can execute no laws, but such as the people perceive to be just and constitutional; for they will possess the power." -- An Examination of The Leading Principles of the Federal Constitution, Philadelphia, 1787
Alexander Hamilton, of New York: "[I]f circumstances should at any time oblige the government to form an army of any magnitude, that army can never be formidable to the liberties of the people while there is a large body of citizens, little if at all inferior to them in discipline and the use of arms, who stand ready to defend their rights and those of their fellow citizens." -- The Federalist, No. 29
Thomas Paine, of Pennsylvania: "[A]rms discourage and keep the invader and plunderer in awe, and preserve order in the world as well as property. . . Horrid mischief would ensue were the law-abiding deprived of the use of them." -- Thoughts On Defensive War, 1775
Fisher Ames, of Massachusetts: "The rights of conscience, of bearing arms, of changing the government, are declared to be inherent in the people." -- Letter to F.R. Minoe, June 12, 1789
Elbridge Gerry, of Massachusetts: "What, sir, is the use of militia? It is to prevent the establishment of a standing army, the bane of liberty. . . Whenever Government means to invade the rights and liberties of the people, they always attempt to destroy the militia, in order to raise a standing army upon its ruins." -- Debate, U.S. House of Representatives, August 17, 1789
Patrick Henry, of Virginia: "Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel." -- Virginia's U.S. Constitution ratification convention
For more information, see Halbrook, Stephen P., "The Right of the People or the Power of the State: Bearing Arms, Arming Militias, and the Second Amendment," Valparaiso Univ. Law Review, Vol. 26, No. 1, Fall, 1991; and "That Every Man Be Armed: The Evolution of a Constitutional Right," Univ. of N.M. Press, 1984
-- Little bit Farm (email@example.com), August 26, 2000
Thank you, Little Bit, for taking the time to find and post this -- I hope that when you move and are off-line for a while, you will occasionally have time to add items such as this for our consideration -- or that someone else will be able to pick up where you must temporarily leave off!!
-- Kathleen Sanderson (firstname.lastname@example.org), August 27, 2000.
Get a copy of the Second Ammendment Primer from the NRA. Its one of the best $20 I ever spent.
-- William in WI (email@example.com), August 28, 2000.
Thank you, thank you! You know, as others might, that we have corresponded on several occassions. I am also a bit to the conservative side of moderate, and am politically a Libertarian, which may raise an eyebrow or 2, since the philosophy embraces what could be considered very liberal ideas. As as an example, I think the "War on drugs", and especially our insane policy of importing hemp (which is a cousin of marijuana, but very different) from Canada, but prohibiting our farmers from growing this very fine and profitable crop, is absolutely insane. Maybe it's the cotton farmers, who grow a fiber far inferior to hemp! But I digress! You know the phrase "well-regulated" in the 2nd Amendment? The leftist, communist, socialist, nazi politicians, as well as the democrat (not democratic, there's a difference!) media want us to believe it translates to "well-controlled" or "well-contained". Not true! If you go to the English language of the day (ie. late 1700's) you will find that the primary definition of "regulated" meant "accurate". Hence a well regulated militia was not one under the thumb of the government, but one that was able to quickly dispatch the enemy due to their expertise with their weapons. I hope and trust that my mentor was mistaken when he opined some 30 years ago that "we will one day wind up fighting these bastards in the streets!" (Just kidding, BATF!) And don't for a minute think they aren't monitoring our messages! Heard of Carnivore? Think that's only to be used against lawbreakers? Believe in Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, and Tooth Fairy? Actually, you've got a better chance with the last 3. (Just kidding, BATF!) As of today, my president is Charlton Heston! GL to all!
-- Brad (Homefixer@SacoRiver.net), August 31, 2000.
Too bad that the wisdom of these great men has not followed down through the years. There is little doubt in my mind as to what was written by the drafters of our great constitution. It is obvious that our rights to bear arms was not to be revoked at some later date. We need to elect only strong believers and willful followers of the constitution to any degree of government. Furthermore, we should view all attacks on our constitution and bill of rights as a threat against our freedom. I fear that our president and his followers may be making the same attack on our country today as Hitler and his followers did on Germany in the 30's in preparation to attack the world. The communist philosophy of, "Tell a big enough lie often enough and soon someone will believe it" seems to have not died with Hitler. Make no mistake, freedom is in danger. I just obtained a new quarter that honors New Hampshire. It is the most beautiful coin I have ever seen. The motto on it, "LIVE FREE OR DIE". Enough said.
-- Burt Young (firstname.lastname@example.org), September 01, 2000.
Agreed! A war IS being waged, with seemingly only one side aware of the battle. And that side is not ours! Frontal attacks are much easier to discern.... lethargy, ignorance & deception are on the side of the enemy, and make no mistake, I knowingly use the word enemy. Ignorance must indeed be bliss, until the moment of surrender or capture! God Bless! Wendy
-- Wendy@GraceAcres (email@example.com), September 01, 2000.
Way to go, Burt et al. There may not be many of us, as indicated by the dearth of answers herein, but we are a dedicated few. GL!
-- Brad (Homefixer@SacoRiver.net), September 01, 2000.