Alien implant removed--I am not making this up

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TB2K spinoff uncensored : One Thread

Fellow skeptics. I pass this on FWIW. I received it as an email tonite. I vaguely remember the Michael Brownlee name from last year. I think he was a New Age type doomer. Anyway, this answers tbe question everyone has been asking--"whatever happened to Michael Brownlee?"

Hey, I don't rule out alien visitations. But if an "implant" has been recovered then I trust it has been carefully examined and its functions identified.

-- Lars (lars@indy.net), July 12, 2000

Answers

Duuh, I forgot the post---

Subject: Awakening to Contact: The Tim Cullen Story now online... Date: Tue, 11 Jul 2000 21:46:02 -0700 From: "Michael Brownlee" To: "Michael Brownlee"

Hi all,

This afternoon I've finally posted the introduction to the story of Tim Cullen, a self-employed cement contractor from a small prairie town in northeastern Colorado -- which happens to be my hometown -- who recently had an "alien implant" removed from his left arm by Dr. Roger Leir (author of "The Aliens and the Scalpel: Scientific Proof of Extraterrestrial Implants in Humans").

This is a project I've been diligently researching since February of this year, which in a few weeks will culminate in the publication of a major downloadable e-book.

I wanted to notify you right away about this material so that you could be among the first to have access to it -- it just went online a few hours ago on the AlienZoo website, at www.alienzoo.com. Just look for "Awakening to Contact," and follow the links to the story. Over the next several weeks I'll be writing about this story and its implications in some depth on this site. (AlienZoo is a "genre-centric new media company" operating a vertical Internet portal delivering content related to extraterrestrial life, the paranormal, and science fiction.)

Cullen's story is important on many levels. He's perhaps the first person to have had an implant surgically removed who is also willing to be publicly identified and fully share his experience. His process of finally awakening to the reality of extraterrestrial/multidimensional contact in his life is to me even more significant -- along with the ripple effect it is producing for his family, his community, and soon even throughout the world.

As newspaper and magazine reporters, researchers and television producers trek to Cullen's hometown to ask probing questions and later share their musings through mass media, the citizens of Yuma, Colorado are beginning to realize that this story is growing and expanding beyond their wildest imaginations. For the first time, they are beginning to share with each other tales of their own close encounters, stories they have long held secret for fear of judgment or ridicule. And they are tentatively beginning to consider and discuss the tantalizing and uncomfortable implications of Tim Cullen's experience. They are sensing that the conversation -- and the profound experiences it points to -- will not go away. Together they are, in effect, awakening to contact.

When I first heard about Cullen's profound experiences, I knew I had to investigate and write about this story. And in the process I have had to come to grips with my own repressed and compartmentalized memories and multidimensional encounters -- some of which I'll share here soon.

The Cullen saga is still unfolding. For instance, hypnotic regression to recover memory of his 1978 close encounter with a UFO (the moment he thinks he was implanted) was attempted last weekend, but revealed a profound block that completely prevented memory retrieval. More about that later...

Meanwhile, I hope you enjoy the story. And I'll be very interested in any comments or questions you might have. I'll do my best to keep you informed about new developments.

Michael Brownlee Visibiliti Unlimited, LLC

-- Lars (lars@indy.net), July 12, 2000.


Is this implant those little metal things that have been found in people's feet and arms? I saw something on TV about them not too long ago.

-- Cherri (sams@brigadoon.com), July 12, 2000.

Maybe scans of CPR's brain might reveal that he, too, has been implanted. Would help explain his recent "reactivation" to hyper active state.

-- Scan Man (Sman@implants.r.us), July 12, 2000.

Do you really think that a civilization advanced enough to fly in from light years away and abduct a human being would have to use the crude methods of "implants" that our current science employs to track wild animals?

In my opinion, it is not possible to "understand" everything that is currently unexplainable, including God and aliens. So take these things with a grain of salt - UFO's are memories of the future; a new mythology in the making.

-- The Mythological Jesus (@ .), July 12, 2000.


no they removed cpr's brain and left the implant

-- richard (richard.dale@onion.com), July 12, 2000.


Do you really think that a civilization advanced enough to fly in from light years away and abduct a human being would have to use the crude methods of "implants" that our current science employs to track wild animals

Yes, so that we wouldn't think they were alien but possibly terrestial or at least open it up to doubt.

-- richard (richard.dale@onion.com), July 12, 2000.


Are you sure that wasn't TOM CULLEN? Tom Cullen, spelled M-O-O-N, that spells Tom Cullen.

-- cin (cin@cin.cin), July 12, 2000.

Another GIANT crock of BULL SHIT. Belongs on EY's EZ forum with the rest of THE CRACKPOTS.

-- cpr (buytexas@swbell.net), July 12, 2000.

For instance, hypnotic regression to recover memory of his 1978 close encounter with a UFO (the moment he thinks he was implanted) was attempted last weekend, but revealed a profound block that completely prevented memory retrieval. (Bold added.)

If he couldn't remember anything of the event, how could he have an idea of when it occurred? Did the alien(s) give him a receipt?

-- David L (bumpkin@dnet.net), July 12, 2000.


Yeah, grade "A" crappola, but then people believe astrology is a science.

Cin, a total aside,

:-)

Frank

-- Someone (ChimingIn@twocents.cam), July 12, 2000.



cin,

TOM CULLEN..M-O-O-N ? I vaguely remember..where do I remember this from?

-- george (jones@choices.com), July 12, 2000.


I wan't a little time to look into this before declaring the facts of the matter. Perhaps this could explain the metal plate in the heads of some doomers, lol...

-- FactFinder (FactFinder@bzn.com), July 12, 2000.

george- I believe that's from The Stand by Stephen King.

-- Gia (laureltree7@hotmail.com), July 13, 2000.

Charles,

Perhaps, but it's one of those subjects that it is fun to speculate about :o)

-- Cherri (sams@brigadoon.com), July 13, 2000.


Frank:

Why do you continue to have an ax to grind? Do I talk about your catholicism on other threads? I do not understand why you deride astrology on this thread. We have had this debate before, and I am not interested in debating it again; we know how each other feels. BUT, in categorically trying to debase another's belief system you walk on the plank of beearing a bad example for your own belief.

Judge not, lest ye be judged, my friend.

-- FutureShock (gray@matter.think), July 13, 2000.



FS,

I am ***NOT*** criticizing anyone's BELIEF SYSTEM, I try to respect peoples' BELIEF SYSTEMS regardless of what I think of them. I have an "axe to grind" with something that is NOT science being CLAIMED to be.

Again, I don't want to rehash all this either particularly, but when people start saying that "astrology" is their BELIEF SYSTEM and not a SCIENCE you will find me profoundly silent on the subject.

Frank

-- Someone (ChimingIn@twocents.cam), July 13, 2000.


Frank, you are a Hypocrite of the first degree! If a person's BELIEF SYSTEM holds that astrology is a SCIENCE (the observation, identification, description, experimental investigation and theoretical explanation of natural phenomenon - Webster's Dictionary) and you continue to belittle and berate that belief, then you DO, indeed, have an axe to grind contrary to your claims otherwise. Get over it, Little Man.

-- LunaC (Laughing@FrankDumbAss.com), July 13, 2000.

Lunacy,

If your belief system is that cows are actually horses do I have to respect that cows are horses too? Sorry, but there's a difference between Beliefs and Facts. Try looking those two words up in your dictionary. Also, why don't you try looking up courtesy.

Frank

-- Someone (ChimingIn@twocents.cam), July 13, 2000.


Frank - Statement #1: I try to respect peoples' BELIEF SYSTEMS

Statement #2: If your belief system is that cows are actually horses do I have to respect that cows are horses too?

Frank, Frank, Frank, you continually tangle yourself in your hypocritical, illogical statements. The answer to Statement #2 is "yes" based on Statement #1.

And when you have the "courtesy" to refer to me as "LunaC" rather than the intentionally sneering "Lunacy", then courtesy will be a reciprocal affair, Dumb Ass.

-- LunaC (Laughing@FrankieDumbAss.com), July 13, 2000.


Uh Lunacy,

If you read back to your first post you'll note you were insulting me *personally* first, as usual. You may be an odious human being, but you're not a very bright one.

Finally disgusted by you,

Frank

-- Someone (ChimingIn@twocents.cam), July 13, 2000.


Frank - Sticks and stones, etc...you still haven't explained the contradiction of your own words. Trying to segue by insulting me doesn't take you off the hook.

-- LunaC (Laughing@FrankieDumbAss.com), July 13, 2000.

I am only in town for a short while and this hasn't been a valid email address since I closed the account in late June. I use it only to continue to identify myself.

LunaC:

If it is only your personal belief, I agree with you. If you try to sell it on the web, the Frank is sort-of correct. If you make money selling it, then you are the same as the folks that hyped Y2k survival supplies; then Frank is completely correct. Verify first and then believe.

Best wishes,,,

-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), July 13, 2000.


I don't see the question of astrology (or a subfield within) being science, as a matter of personal belief. Science involves formulating theories based on observations, and continuing to reexamine those theories in the context of subsequent observations, keeping, refining or discarding theories accordingly. (How's that for a run-on sentence, Frank.)

To the extent that astrology's theories are subject to this type of scrutiny, the field may be considered science.

-- David L (bumpkin@dnet.net), July 13, 2000.


Z - If it is only your personal belief, I agree with you.

Thank you. Keep in mind, however, that it isn't just MY belief but the belief of millions through many millennium.

If you try to sell it on the web, the Frank is sort-of correct. If you make money selling it, then you are the same as the folks that hyped Y2k survival supplies; then Frank is completely correct.

Why would this invalidate it?

Verify first and then believe.

I have. Have you or Frank? I'd love nothing more than to have the skeptics seriously delve into the subject for the purpose of disproving its validity. THEN we'd have one helluva' discussion! Until then, the skeptics are just throwing stones at the elephant in the shadows.

David - Science involves formulating theories based on observations,

This is exactly how astrology began. Very good.

and continuing to reexamine those theories in the context of subsequent observations,

Several millennium's worth. Check.

keeping, refining or discarding theories accordingly.

Check.

To the extent that astrology's theories are subject to this type of scrutiny, the field may be considered science.

BINGO! Give this man a prize!

-- LunaC (CheckItOutSkeptics@Research.com), July 13, 2000.


LunaC:

Reminder: this is no longer a valid email address.

Z - If it is only your personal belief, I agree with you. Thank you. Keep in mind, however, that it isn't just MY belief but the belief of millions through many millennium.

Chump change compared to the number that thought that the world would end with computer failure on 01Jan00. If you try to sell it on the web, the Frank is sort-of correct. If you make money selling it, then you are the same as the folks that hyped Y2k survival supplies; then Frank is completely correct. Why would this invalidate it?

Under these conditions, it would for me; but I am just one person who is now leaving again.

Best wishes,,,,,

-- Z1X4Y7 (Z1X4Y7@aol.com), July 13, 2000.


Could you make an astrological chart for an alien from a galaxy ten light years from here who measures time on a different calendar? I have this friend.......

-- Lars (lars@indy.net), July 13, 2000.

...this friend? You don't fool me, Lars, I know your real name is Oogleebzzlblorp245602.

-- David L (bumpkin@dnet.net), July 13, 2000.

Frankie struggles frantically to untangle himself from his web of words and his beeeeeg brain works feverishly to concoct a shred-proof rebuttal that justifies his contradictory statements. Sweat pours from his forehead as he gnaws at his fingertips trying to extricate himself from the cruel verbiage that demands an accounting. Despite his feeble efforts he sits defeated then scampers quickly and quietly to the shadows hoping no one will notice his cowardice after so much false bravado and gnashing of teeth. Woe to the Beast who speaks with forked tongue for he shall never know the respect he so desperately craves.

The Kingdom rejoices and all is well for everyone but the faker.

-- LunaC (Laughing@HarderThanEver.com), July 14, 2000.


David,

Well, it depends on your goal. It was still quite understandable, so from one perspective it's great, but from another it won't be good enough for a .gov publication.

Good memory BTW,

Frank

-- Someone (ChimingIn@twocents.cam), July 14, 2000.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ