How many lurkers hang around just to confirm L.L is really crazy? : LUSENET : TB2K spinoff uncensored : One Thread

I am an old time lurker. Feb. 99.

5 to 6 on the Y2K scale. At least thats what I preped for.

Doomers, you've scared me worse than that! I'm still not out of T.P.

Pollies, made me slow down and think!

L.L. is a big time problem waiting to happen.

Yes, I've been around for awhile. The rest of the regulars respond to her or ignore her or still incourage her!

Or get on with there lives.

Unk, your a hunk!!!!

I have not been personaly involved because some people are CRAZY!

I hate to admit it....Makes me seem feel like a scared-di-cat!

I only hang around as an L.L. fan to watch her fold. Poker anyone?

Shame on me!!!

I also get a kick out of Flint too.

I'm just waiting for all the inclusive posters to wake-up!

You people should be really scared.

-- what? (, May 18, 2000


Flint, do you still undertake 4 hour emails?

-- L.L. is wHAT? (, May 18, 2000.

LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz!

-- LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz! (LLisnutz@nutz.nutz.nutz), May 18, 2000.

where else does LL post

anyone have the opinion of the other posters she crosses swords with, I mean is she like this with everyone

there is a purpose to the existence of every creature, ecveryone plays a role

-- richard (, May 18, 2000.

LL revealed her true, psychotic, schizophrenic, dangerous, amoral self in her pornographic takeover of Bok's chatroom last summer. It was an interesting time on the TB2000 forum. Only two types of posters - those who had seen her in action at Bok's and were disgustd beyond belief, and those who hadn't yet and were trying to give her the benefit of the doubt. Until, of course, they saw for themselves. For all Anita's gracious comments about the chatroom, it was LL who intentionally took it down, along with at least two forums.

It's hard for the newer participants on these forums to appreciate just how deranged (and dangerous) she really is. But she does leave clues, like telling the people she is ripping up and spreading slanderous gossip about and openly investigating that she would never "harm" them. How come she keeps saying that?

-- Whatever (, May 18, 2000.

I have been lurking in the spirit world since 1939, and I gotta tell you, that LL is one strange cookie! Veeeeeery interesting.

(PS, if you think Unk is a hunk, you are veeeery, veeeeery desperate!)

-- Sigmund Freud (LL@is.loony.tune), May 18, 2000.

(Chuckle) I'll bet to YOU guys I am one strange cookie! Those who take what people say in internet chat rooms too seriously need to have their heads examined themselves.

Oh, I can't leave without saying hi to Old Git...Hi, Old Git! Your jigs up because someone in Bok's and someone told me by e-mail that you've one of the people who have been harassing me. Sorry to see that you're still crying about Bok's last year, but it figures. YOU lost all credibility last year and I tore down the place that you were trying to build it back up. As a matter of fact...I've kept you from repairing your credibility anywhere, haven't I? Quit freaking out. Even if I weren't around, you wouldn't have any. Your words and actions give you away.

Gotta go! I have better things to do than talk to an old catfish with dried up breasts!!

(OTFR, if you happen to read this thread, will you please verify that someone has been imitating me again? Someone is posting "I did not write that" after my posts. Thanks.)


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

Sorry, not Git. Of course you would never own up to the fact that Bok graciously set up the chatroom so there could be pleasant, civil conversations among forum participants, not so you could trash it with your pornographic and psychotic rantings. Of course, everyone and everything you CAN touch is yours to destroy, isn't it honey?

-- Whatever (, May 18, 2000.

FYI Old Git hasn't been on line, anywhere, for the past 2 weeks. Her computer is down.

-- You (really@re.nuts), May 18, 2000.

Git, you bore me. (And everyone else with your endless drivel.) However, I have nothing else better to do this morning. What else would you like to talk about?


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

Some of the most fun I had in Boks was when LadyLogic was in there.

The night when we were ALL Old Git (and one "Older Git")comes to mind...we all had "sweeties" and waterbeds! I haven't laughed that hard since. Scrolling insanity led to some creative fun! (Unk was king!)

Oh My God, remember when (was it Decker or Flint?) was left there alone with Laura after the rest of us jumped to the Safe Haven..and he was begging us for the password..heh, and we were debating letting him in..LOL. And since he was stuck there, he was trying to reason with her..being all compassionate and understanding,..and she kept telling him to go away..LOL. I almost miss that...those were some fun nights!

Laura, you nut!...I gotta admit you kept it interesting! :-)

-- kritter (, May 18, 2000.

Well....I'm still waiting. I'll bet you're typing fast and furiously, aren't you? :o)


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000. essage?topicID=4362.topic

I think Old Git has been planting her garden, and also coping with a hard disk crash on her (non-Macintosh) computer, waiting for repairs, etc etc.


Right now, Ed is right about the computer crash for OG. Among other things, this is the primary reason she has been missing.


-- You (really@re.nuts), May 18, 2000.

Whoa, kritter! We must have posted at the same time!

Yeah, I had some GREAT times in the chatroom! I learned a lot of interesting things in there, that I probably never would have learned anywhere else. It was there that I first found out that I learned how to understand computers rather than just use them. It was there that my interest in understanding the internet started. I learned a LOT in that chatroom, and my curiosity still has me learning this stuff.

Besides, I really do have a soft spot for most of the people from back then. I'll never forget the night I apologized to you guys for spamming and told you I had written a letter of apology to Bok. Do you still remember? I couldn't decide if I should e-mail it to him or post it publically and you said post it and don't look back. As it turned out, I just e-mailed it to him because it was deleted right away, and I've slept better knowing I've done my best.

Yeah, we had some fun, kritter. But, obviously, SOMEONE is still ticked off.

Anyway, I have to go eat some breakfast. I'll see you later!


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

Git, you're still crazy :o)

Quit posting the same time I do!


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

OMG, kritter. IF (by some stretch of the imagination) that isn't Git, do you think it's Mrs. Bok?

"You really are nuts", if you are Mrs. Bok, why don't you just say so and talk to me about this? I'd be happy to, because I don't want you to keep hurting over this.


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

BTW, kritter, it was Decker. I couldn't believe he was trying to "reason" with me after he said I would try the patience of Gandi! LOLOLOL! It wasn't funny to me at the time, but I find it hilarious today. I've even used that line on my nephew! (Thanks, Decker.)

(Oh, no! I'm spamming THIS board now! :o)


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

I guess I'll have to write OTFR a letter of apology now too. :o)


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

A normal person wouldn't have to apologize so much....

-- LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! (nutz@nutz.nutz.nutz), May 18, 2000.

YOU should apologize to HER!

-- (Tired @of this .bashing), May 18, 2000.

Gotta go! I have better things to do than talk to an old catfish with dried up breasts!!

However, I have nothing else better to do this morning. ~*~

-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.


You really do need some medication, Laura. Take a good hard look at what you've written. Seriously, there is something wrong with you.

-- x (x@x.x), May 18, 2000.

I didn't originate that saying, a DeBunker did.


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

Speaking of something being wrong with people, x...why do you post so many worthless posts? Are you afraid of EVERYTHING in the world? Don't you get tired of people ignoring your posts because they are SO stupid?

(By the way, it was CJS who originally said that about you.)


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

Furthermore, my remark about apologizing to OTFR about spamming was said tongue in cheek.


-- (Ladylogic @...), May 18, 2000.

Posting multiple posts in the same thread while writing something different is NOT considered spamming in most chatrooms.


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

Only people whose lives are so dull they want to complain about SOMETHING would make that an issue.


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.


(Now, do you want to arm wrestle?)


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.



-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

I apologize.

I shouldn't incite the unwell.

-- what? (, May 18, 2000.

And to think I once considered YOU to be the victim. But I think I know better now, just as many have come to. You can only fool people for so long. And boy was I wrong about you. You are a sick person.


-- x (x@x.x), May 18, 2000.

You are a stark raving mad lunatic and I wonder how many suspect lists you are on. You are even *more* suspect if you were a PI.

How many sites have you shutdown now? Of course you *used* to be a PI. What cracker jack box did you get your license out of? What happened, did they pull your license for psychiatric reasons? All of the PI's I know, and I know serveral, do nothing more than spy on cheating spouses and people faking disability claims. Some don't even have a conceal carry permit. People with real law enforcement backgrounds know better than to stalk and shut down forums. You're a fraud trying to scare and intimidate people. Cyber predator.

You probably sent away from some correspondence course in the back of a magazine and for $150 bucks anybody can call themselves a PI. If you read your manual, you should know that the laws are very strict for PI's about using the term to intimidate people. And the laws vary from state to state for even being able to practice it as a profession.

-- shameonU (, May 18, 2000.

I'm so very sorry for all I've done to hurt you people. But I am not well at all, as you can see by my posts. Please do not hold my personality disorder against me. I am really not in control of myself.

Please forgive me.

Wait a minute! I didn't write this!

Yes you did.

No I didn't.

Daddy don't hurt me again.

Stop it#5, you are getting me in trouble again.

No I'm not.

Yes I am.

Somebody help me please.

-- <> (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

I didn't write that!

or did I?


Help me.

-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

Shame on you:

See my newest post to dear ol whora LAURA.......Spammed-not for the faint of heart.

Laura, Congrats there girlfriend...I am amazed at how I underestimated your true computer skills...well, have fun slut, my email is disabled now, and FWIW thats what I got for trusting a Lunatic like you, but hey, free speech, huh, slut?

PROZAC, you need PROZAC or would that be lithium?

------consumer who is GOING OFF over recent SPAM attack by da slut.

-- consumer (, May 18, 2000.

OUT! OUT! You stinking troll!!! Out of my house!

What kind of minds talk about other people???


snarlin' at the visitor...

The Dog

-- The Dog (, May 18, 2000.

Umm, who is the "visitor", Dog. Are you talking to me?

Consumer, I suggest you go read your thread and e-mail cin.

I also expect an apology for calling me whora.


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

Yeah right, I'll apologize when you begin holding your breath.

----waiting for you to start holding it?

PS to the dog, when you receive 50+ spammed emails you will understand, IF you were addressing me...I am very angry at this point.

Lady Lunacy, my mom taught me to 'trust', guess your mom never did teach you how to 'behave'? but hey, in the end you will win, just like you did at the other place, where was that? Boks, and to think I gave YOU the benefit of the doubt.

-- consumer (, May 18, 2000.


Sheesh, do you always act on impulse this much?


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

You 1st Whora, I insist, to the other thread...THE TRUTH is now out.

-----@ work w/no sauce, that seems to be your only defense I'm drunk?

nice try

-- consumer (, May 18, 2000.

What was really disgusting was LL's conversation with her boyfriend (herself of course). My guess is that mr polly (on this board), a gentleman, and other "men" were actually LL talking to "herself", that is if LL is really even a woman. I have my doubts about that. But hey, someone's got to love her, even if she has to fabricate that someone.

-- x (x@x.x), May 18, 2000.

x, you just keep proving how stupid you are :o)


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

ROFLMAO = the ghandi quote! LOL I had forgotten that! :-) Ken, that nut! He's too funny. Classic stuff! Damn, 1999 was so much fun. How can 2000 possibly top that? Dunno..but I'm working on it! :-)

-- kritter (, May 18, 2000.


Actually, I had a friend once who did weird stuff like this.

She was very intelligent and had a lot of creative talent. But after a while, I started thinking something was wrong. She had a few drinks one night and spilled the beans to me that she was making fake screen names and talking to herself in chat rooms. She said she did this so that she would look appealing to the men without seeming too overt. She was trying to turn on somebody and wanted it to appear as if "men REALLY wanted her badly". She also wanted to appear popular so she would make up other screen names and talk to herself too. And then she wanted it to appear as if women were jealous of her, so she played that role too.

Anyway, she would laugh herself silly over this. Her goal was to stir up trouble in order to draw attention to herself. She came out of a 12 yr. marriage where she had been abused and her self image was low. I felt sorry for her and stayed her friend until one day my boyfriend came to me and told me how she had been writing emails to him and how she wanted to sleep with him. Then I found out that she did this to another one of our friends. And on and on it went.

I kept finding out more and more after I told her to hit the road. I felt betrayed. But then as time went on, I found out how REALLY nuts she was. Last I heard she was on disability for a psychiatric problem.

-- NoLie (NoLie@true.yes), May 18, 2000.


I was addressing the original poster, "L.L. is what?"...

I have no beef with either Laura or Consumer.

Hi, Consumer!


The Dog

-- The Dog (, May 18, 2000.

The looney lady ain't happy unless she's center stage. She's a sick cuckoo bird and she is creepy.

-- katy (katy@did.did), May 18, 2000.

LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz!

LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz!

LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz!

LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz!

LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz!

-- LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! (nutz@nutz.nutz.nutz.nutz), May 18, 2000.

Hey, whoa, hold up, wait a minute. Sometimes I lurk, because once this board was the primo information source on the net. LL erupted onto the event horizon, tore the board apart, restructured it, directed it and in true dominatrix style, preoccupies it. She's an obsession, a force of nature to the posters. To tell you the truth, I think she's annoying but powerful. Sort of like the flea and the plague in medieval Europe. I often wonder is she/it is not an elegant construct. And that is meant to be the utlimate tribute to a complex and adept psyche.

If I had not personally experienced the Old Board, I wouldn't give her a second thought except to admire her for her balls (and that's saying plenty). None of the new derivative boards have the combination of accuracy, passion and the tremendous power of debate and universal access that the old one did. So...she's not nuts-she's a weapon. Potent, pliant, proven to be an Eve of Information Destruction. I lurk, I look, I leave. She's (whoever or whatever is, made this her board. You have to give it to the Lady-that's not nutz, that's power. Shouts to you, LL, but be careful who uses you.

-- charlie (a woman) (, May 18, 2000.

Sort of like the flea and the plague in medieval Europe.

So, Charlie [a woman],

Is LL a flea or a plague?

-- Inquiring minds (want@nswers.uc), May 18, 2000.

An elegant question, Inquiring Minds. Without the flea, there would have been no plague.

The LL persona is extremely likable to both sexes: naughty, rebellious, disruptive and highly intelligent.A Little Annie Fannie of the Internet. In and of itself that persona is not deadly. Like the flea, it makes one itch and scratch the most indelicate places. And to the adolescent, indelicate behavior has great value: much like Elizabethan scatalogical humor. If the antics of LL had not disrupted an international forum of great value, I would probably not sustain any interest in that persona. And I use the word "persona" advisedly. LL intervenes in a form most likely to attract attention to itself at the point of intervention and DISTRACTS attention from pertinent issues at the point of intervention-it morphs as required. This attribute is my area of interest.

We are engaging in construction of a classic example. We discuss LL while issues concerning Los Alamos, decaying space equipment, geomagnetic disturbances ,massive security problems in government and infrastructure malfunction are before us. This would not have happened on the old board. For any one entity to wield such influence is a matter requiring some thought and analysis. I "lurk", as do my cohort. I am amused to see the effect of LL on the Board. Again, she/it calls the tune and the posters dance. Whether "nutz" or sane, LL has been given control and willingly done by those who dance to the tune she pipes.

So the issue of sanity remains open-is it LL who deviates? Or do those of us who feed into this attention getting mode fall into the class of incompetence?

Yes, I am a woman. I used the pseudonymn "Charlie" because men carry more weight in the world, and I did not want to enter the old forum and be dismissed-that is fact, not a feminist statement. As a woman I can identify with some aspects of LL=women learn early to manipulate, diplomacy is a gift granted to the weak- but other LL behaviors are not congruent with contemporary femininity. Please keep in mind, I am a , not a female child, and I have an experience base (or data base) from which I analyse. LL of the Powdered Bum is not a consistent construct.It is effective, however, in maintaining fragmentation of the old board members, and diverting the attention of current participants into no-productive discourse.

-- charlie (, May 18, 2000.

And please forgive the lack of editing,since as a "woman" I am dealing with issues of marriage and offspring and dishes and interruptions and my own persona-this means children and kitchen, church later in the week, so my writing often suffers-but my net interactions hold weight for me as well.

I do believe,Inquiring Minds, you'll sift through the errors and derive the content.

Good night all.


-- charlie (, May 18, 2000.

So I suppose that the LL bashers could be considered flea powder for her bum, eh?


-- LL has fleas on her bum! (, May 18, 2000.


Sweet Dreams, Alginon.


-- (Ladylogic@...), May 18, 2000.

Some education! Can't even spell a name that was in the title of a book that was required reading in 5th grade!


Go dust your garage-sale bought plaques.


-- LL is nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz! nutz! (nutz@nutz.nutz.nutz.nutz), May 18, 2000.


Bet she wouldn't have the guts to direct anything toward you! LOL!!

-- L.L is what? (, May 19, 2000.

She has no more power than anybody else here. It's just that the rest of us don't choose to haunt, stalk, and manipulate people. She's a brat who never grew up, that's all.

I don't feel sorry for her just as I don't try to psychoanalyze or have sympathy for the hackers and deviants who bring down web sites.

If somebody steals pennies their whole lives, eventually they will try dimes. And if they get away with dimes, they move on to quarters. And so it goes, she will continue until she decides to get even with the world and make them pay; blah, blah, blah. She's nothing more than a cyber predator. Wake up folks. There are a lot of them out there. Hackers are into the power and are probably intriguing to some folks, but not to me--and not to the judge.

-- nope (nope@nope.not), May 19, 2000.

She's not a hacker.

She's just a shopworn old bitch.

-- No one (wants@the.old.nag), May 19, 2000.

No one,

You are probably right. But when people do this off the wall stuff, ya can't help but wonder what they are capable of. Maybe she will get some professional help. It seems in order.

-- Nope (Nope@nope.not), May 19, 2000.

"We are engaging in construction of a classic example. We discuss LL while issues concerning Los Alamos, decaying space equipment, geomagnetic disturbances ,massive security problems in government and infrastructure malfunction are before us. This would not have happened on the old board."

Charlie, your take on LL is interesting. But I don't agree, especially with this quote above. In my view, those who pay attention the most to LL are those who contribute the least in the way of intellectual discourse and current events. These people didn't contribute any more quality posts prior to LL's arrival, and reacted to attention-seeking troll posts much the same way as they do now.

There's also the fact that LL is a facinating case study in personality disorder (borderline personality would be my guess) for the more intellectually inclined.

-- (, May 19, 2000.


I'd have to agree with you on the borderline personality diagnosis. I have personal experience with one. It's not pleasant living with them or having to deal with them on a close, personal basis.

-- Lurker2 (lots@to.lurk.for), May 19, 2000.

Not strictly a personality disorder - drugs and/or alcohol are apparently also involved. The amazing thing about the real-time chats last fall was that she would assume a personality for a while, disappear for a while, and comeback in a completely different mode. First, quite companionable, later extremely abusive or obscene, later still extremely apologetic, repeating these outbursts throughout the evening. These things aren't apparent in a discussion forum.

-- Whatever (, May 19, 2000.

"ya can't help but wonder what they are capable of"

Suicide, hopefully.

(If you knew her in RL, you'd say the same thing.)

-- No one (wants@the.old.nag), May 19, 2000.

I note that we were hit with another Coronal Mass Ejection yesterday (THU 5/18) and it may have continued last night. Maybe this is what's causing all the craziness here at the Forum. Also, wasn't yesterday a Full Moon? Double Whammy time!

-- Flash (flash@flash.hq), May 19, 2000.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ