http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=00393h I've spent some time today trying to kick Andy Ray +/or Stephen Poole around the block, but hell they are wonderful angels compared to this piece of excrement. Pollies, are you proud of yourselves? I bet you have a pretty good idea of who is responsible for this.

-- Peter Errington (petere@ricochet.net), May 12, 2000.

-------------------------------------

As your token Nazi-censor type on this board, I find the discussion so far to be just diddling around the subject of what most needs to be done, which IMHO is: Make every effort to find out who the creep is, expose him, ban him, and report him to his ISP (which if you could do that would make him, I think, a two-time loser)

-- Peter Errington (petere@ricochet.net), May 13, 2000.

..................... EVERYTHING IS "BLACK AND WHITE" FOR THIS TWIT. ANYONE WHO OPPOSES HIM IS A *DE-FACTO* "POLLY".

SIGN THIS GUY UP FOR THE FIRST ROUND OF BRAIN IMPLANT TESTS.

........................

-- The Shadow Knows (Shadow@knows.con), May 13, 2000

Answers

Peter Errington and Stephen Poole

http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=0039HY

-- (thread@to.thread), May 13, 2000.

http://hv.greenspun.com/bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg.tcl?msg_id=000uvp

SPEAKING OF NAZIs

LINK

-- The Shadow Knows (Shadow@knows.con), May 13, 2000.

Ah, CPR, the great logician. Why don't you just drop this Shadow business and resume using "CPR" under which you have accumulated a truly remarkable reputation.

It's always a temptation not to respond to you, and let the world marvel at your posts. And no matter how simple I try to make things, you just can't ever seem to get anything through your head. Nevertheless, I will make the effort.

You summarize my call for censorship of this one individual as follows:

EVERYTHING IS "BLACK AND WHITE" FOR THIS TWIT. ANYONE WHO OPPOSES HIM IS A DE-FACTO "POLLY"

Now pay real close attention here please. The fact that it was Diane who was the target of the two incredibly vile posts doesn't have anything to do with what I said. I would have reacted the same way if the target had been anybody else.

Have I been going too fast for you. I truly hope not.

I hoped that the decent pollies would say something. I guess their dislike of Diane is so intense that they averted their eyes.

-- Peter Errington (petere@ricochet.net), May 13, 2000.

Peter, shut the fuck up. You'll be less likely to display your ignorance that way.

-- (Pretty @ Yellow Polly .bird), May 13, 2000.

Once again we see the true colors of this board.

The New DeBunkie's House o' Trolls

You people just keep proving why an "uncensored" forum is just for the kiddies.

(snicker)

-- Yeah Right (Ahhh@haaa.haaa.haaa), May 13, 2000.

"I hoped that the decent pollies would say something. I guess their dislike of Diane is so intense that they averted their eyes."

Does this mean that Buddy and I are INDECENT pollies?

-- Anita (Anita_S3@hotmail.com), May 13, 2000.

Yes, Anita, I think it does mean that, and you can be proud of it. The entertainment value of all the Y2K fora was mostly provided by the Polly/Doomer Obsessives (PDO's), of which you were never one.

-- (Still laughing@flamefest.com), May 13, 2000.

Anita, I certainly did not have you in mind. My phraseology was careless. I meant all the people who come over with the creep when BIFFY folded.

-- Peter Errington (petere@ricochet.net), May 13, 2000.

But Peter, the folks over at the Biffy board were right on the money about Y2K and spent countless hours trying to offset the delusional bullshit put forth by idiot assholes like you. The question as I see it is why the fuck are you still running your no-nothing mouth? You have ZERO credibility and for you to out those who were correct just certifies how very lame you are. Get It?

-- Ra (tion@l.1), May 13, 2000.

New Forum Administrator.

I would like to thank you for keeping this site up and running. Ill stick around and try to contribute with the hope that we develop some stimulating threads on whatever comes up. I will not return to the so-called other uncensored forum just out of my personal feelings on selective censorship. I thought the OTFR did one heck of a job but the recent deletions have turned me off. I still enjoy lurking over there and get a kick out of being accused of spamming, which I have never done.

-- Ra (tion@l.1), May 05, 2000
Link

Ra AKA sifting, you have ZERO credibility. Can you say, "I was wrong and I'm very very sorry."

-- (pants@on.fire), May 13, 2000.

(pants@on.fire),

Well what can I say other than who gives a fuck. So I returned, so what. You swore to stop giving blow jobs in dark alleys so whats your excuse. Why not use your normal phony handle? Think Im going to jump out of the monitor and head-butt you? Pleasant thought.

-- Ra (tion@l.1), May 14, 2000.