Cost to buy electricity heats up - prices 200 times normal

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TB2K spinoff uncensored : One Thread

Cost to buy electricity heats up

Shut plants, demand send wholesale price to 200 times normal

By Peter J. Howe, Globe Staff, 5/9/2000

ven as managers of New England's electric grid issued a forecast that power supplies should be adequate this summer, unusually high temperatures, combined with a huge number of unexpected plant shutdowns, sent spot-market prices up to 20 times normal levels yesterday.

With twice as many plants down for maintenance as had been scheduled - a situation that raised suspicions among some energy buyers - spot market prices hit $6,000 a megawatt-hour for several hours yesterday, up from $25 to $30 normally.

Unless grid managers find a reason to reset market prices, as they have during some previous periods of peak demand, some wholesale power buyers spent as much buying electricity for clients yesterday as they would normally spend in an entire month of spring afternoons.

Officials said yesterday's price spike should affect only brokers and speculators. But over time, some industry analysts fear New England electric customers will begin to pay noticeably more if wild price spikes continue to be a regular feature of the new competitive market launched last year.

''It may take a long time for it to filter down to the end user, but the cost is there,'' said Mark Ishkanian, a spokesman for Central Maine Power in Augusta. ''We all want the markets to work, but surely there have been some bumps on the road [that] will call into question the integrity of the system.''

In what officials acknowledged was an embarrassing coincidence, on the same day that grid manager ISO New England, a nonprofit company in Holyoke, had to declare a ''power watch'' for the region and urge people not to use air conditioners, it issued a forecast that power supplies should be adequate this summer.

ISO officials cited 2,000 more megawatts of capacity expected to be in service by June compared to a year earlier. Repeated power crunches last summer led to 12 days of power watches and warnings, and occasional state government shutdowns to stave off threats of rolling blackouts to conserve power.

Yesterday, one issue that raised questions among some industry officials was that more than 8,400 megawatts of generating capacity - nearly 45 percent of the peak afternoon demand - was out of service, including about 3,600 megawatts more than expected in ''unplanned outages'' not related to seasonal maintenance.

Some officials said it was legitimate to ask whether generators were holding plants out of operation in order to drive up the spot-market price. Everyone selling power in a given hour gets the last, highest price paid to a generator to meet peak demand, and one afternoon of windfall profits can make a huge impact on a plant's monthly income.

Stephen Tuleja, president of Alternate Power Source in Westwood, which buys power for FleetBoston Financial Corp., Texas Instruments' Attleboro plant, and several other large electric users, said the ISO agency ''must step in'' to offset yesterday's ''excessive unplanned outages.''

''New England consumers should not bear the brunt of untimely and questionable maintenance,'' said Tuleja, echoing comments made by some other buyers who asked not to be named.

Tuleja predicted that many Massachusetts retail customers soon could see power prices rise 20 percent higher than they were before the March 1998 deregulation law, ''if the flaws in the wholesale market are not corrected immediately.''

Central Maine's Ihskanian said, ''I am not going to accuse anybody of anything, but when you are talking about $6,000 prices, that's a very strong incentive'' for generators and resellers to engage in ''opportunistic actions'' to try to drive up the market price.

Already, the ISO has moved to abolish one of the new wholesale markets - which pays generators a monthly bounty for maintaining ''installed capacity'' in the region - because of evidence one or more unidentified generators schemed to drive up prices in January.

James B. Sinclair, spokesman for the ISO, acknowledged that the level of unplanned outages was high. ''It's something that we are obviously watching very closely, and we certainly are not shy about asking questions.''

However, Sinclair said ISO officials found no immediate reason to be suspicious about the number of plant outages. Under ISO competitive secrecy rules, he could not say which plants were down, but industry officials said one big contributor was a shutdown at a Millstone nuclear unit in Connecticut.

Neal B. Costello, general counsel of the Competitive Power Coalition, representing generators, said, ''We want to make sure that this doesn't get laid at the feet of generators. The only ones paying $6,000 are sophisticated speculators in the market who got caught short and made a bad decision or an arrogant decision.''

Costello said people raising questions about price-fixing by generators have ''a vested interest'' in pressuring the ISO to knock down market prices and said, ''This idea of a generators' cabal just does not exist.''

Michael Monahan, spokesman for NStar, the parent company of Boston Edison, Cambridge Electric, and Commonwealth Electric, said the company's 1 million customers would not be affected by yesterday's market action because the utility has a fixed-price power supply contract through June 1 with Select Energy.

But Massachusetts Electric has asked state regulators for permission to raise power prices charged to more than 200,000 ''default service'' customers by 54 percent starting June 1 because it fears continued market price spikes.

Monahan confirmed NStar is considering a similar request, which would affect anyone who got a new electric account after March 1998 but not people who get ''standard offer'' power.

http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/130/business/Cost_to_buy_electricity_heats_up%2b.shtml

-- - (x@xxx.com), May 09, 2000

Answers

Yesterday, one issue that raised questions among some industry officials was that more than 8,400 megawatts of generating capacity - nearly 45 percent of the peak afternoon demand - was out of service, including about 3,600 megawatts more than expected in ''unplanned outages'' not related to seasonal maintenance.

Squirrels.

-- - (x@xxx.com), May 09, 2000.


Gonna be a long hot summer with a lot of burnt squirrel carcasses laying around. Gotta be the squirrels. I agree. After all, the y2k bug was, is, and will always be no big deal. Gotta go sell some more of my preps. Gonna have to pay those high electric bills. Should have stockpiled ice instead of kerosene.

-- greg (drgah@earthlink.com), May 09, 2000.

The "year" 2000 may turn out to be more interesting than any of us thought, I, for one, was considered a doomer because I was concerned about the potential for disruptions in all of our live's.

I was "dead wrong" about most of what I feared, for that I am thankful on a daily basis. I love my family and friends, and am eternally greatful life has continued the same for them, even if they disregarded the possibility of being wrong.

Now, that I've had the opportunity to "open my eyes" thru the conversations and links I find here and at ez board. I am much more aware of the fragility of what we all take for granted every day. Many things could upset the "apple cart" so to speak.

I, for one, will always do my best to have enough "on hand" to protect myself and my family. Y2K rollover has certainly proved to be a dud, my appreciation of my fellow men and women has gone up several notches. When under a definite deadline, globally, we implemented many fixes, some of which might be breaking under the strain of time, I expect these same folks to continue finding work arounds.

My company (an unnamed computer wholesale company) has experienced many, and I mean many, problems with our software over the past five months, some minor and fixed within minutes, and quite a few disrupting business operations for hours at a time. We sit around twiddeling our thumbs waiting to be back "up". Meanwhile we continue doing business with "good old fashioned" paper and ink and then input the data into the system when we go live so things can be shipped. I doubt we are the only company who has this problem.

What concerns me is every update from our software vender to "correct" our problems lately, has created more downtime than the previous "fix", almost seems to be cumulative.

Anyway, enough of my rant concerning my irritations, time to go out in this great weather and play with the new (nine weeks old) puppy, what a "breath of fresh air" he is.

-- Michael (michaelteever@buffalo.com), May 09, 2000.


SHOCKING!

-- Ready (Kilo@Watt.com), May 09, 2000.

"Now, that I've had the opportunity to "open my eyes" thru the conversations and links I find here and at ez board. I am much more aware of the fragility of what we all take for granted every day. Many things could upset the "apple cart" so to speak. "

Sonofabitch! Didn't you learn anything from being a Y2K doomer? If I read about the "fragility of our system" once more I'm...I'm....,well I'm gonna write a response.

Ourt system is not "fragile" It is amazingly resilient and able to handle all sorts of twists and turns. Humans still run things and can still fix things.

BTW, did all your computer systems at work always run perfectly in 1999 and have just decided to misbehave starting on January 1?

Have fun with the puppy.

-- Jim Cooke (JJCooke@yahoo.com), May 09, 2000.



Damn Jim,

Lighten up a touch, all I was saying is that, things seem to be headed in such a "marvelous" way, it might not be a bad idea to keep your eyes open to "things" going on around us.

I've always appreciated your rational viewpoints on many topics, may have only lurked and not contributed, but I recognize your points and find no reason to add anything else.

But, in this instance, I'm living it, this is a system that worked almost flawlessly until the updates to "fix" the problem were implemented, now it's almost a joke at work. What's going to "f**k up today". It's expected, work around's which cost my company money daily to keep things running, how much productive time is being lost solving problems, rather than working on new business?

I certainly don't have a clue about worldwide, I only know where I work, it seems to be a lot.

-- Michael (michaelteever@buffalo.com), May 09, 2000.


Michael:

Sorry if I was a little touchy but I'm really tired of hearing about the fragility of our systems. If Y2K doesn't prove our systems are pretty tough, what will?

I've had several systems that have gone through Y2K upgrades. Some went perfectly and others had problems. Without exception, the ones with problems were due to a lot of bad programming that would have caused problems regardless of the year. I hope that your company has better luck but it doesn't sound like it so far. In one case, we finally just dumped the original software and went with another vendor since getting everything up to speed with the new software would take less time than fixing the bugs in the old software.

OTOH, as you write, the company is still functioning even if the software isn't working. That's what I meant by being irritated at hearing about fragility. If your company was fragile, everything would grind to halt if the comuter was down. Instead, people still conduct business just like they did before we had computers. That's the resiliency of the system and it extends from your company to the rest of the world.

-- Jim Cooke (JJCooke@yahoo.com), May 09, 2000.


I concur whole-heartedly. Good night Jim, I think the puppy finally tired me out.

-- Michael (michaelteever@buffalo.com), May 09, 2000.

Tuesday 2 May
Spanish farmers are growing three-metre-high artichokes for burning in special power stations to produce electricity. The genetically modified vegetables have seven-metre roots and will generate power for 600,000 people in two northern towns.

......hell's bell's, I just pass this delectable stuff on....,don't know why really...

-- Pieter (zaadz@icisp.net.au), May 10, 2000.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ