JUDGE ALSDORF'S EMAIL AND PHONE NUMBER - HE NEEDS TO KNOW HOW YOU FEEL.

greenspun.com : LUSENET : I-695 Thirty Dollar License Tab Initiative : One Thread

Once again: Here is the good judge's email address and phone number.

email: robert.alsdorf@metrokc.gov

phone: 206-296-9203

If you disagree with him, then you need to let him know about it. This is obviously working, as now they have switched incoming calls to the message machine. Do not let up the pressure on this man.

-- Martin Yeager (myeager10@aol.com), March 15, 2000

Answers

"This is obviously working, as now they have switched incoming calls to the message machine."

Yeah, its called "screening your calls"; and it works wonders with annoyances like you.

You really want someone to blame (besides yourself)?

Try Tim Eyeman's Yes-men:

Jack Fagan Spokane area representative and Co-Sponsor of Son of I-695 and The Traffic Improvement Initiative Phone/Fax: (509) 467-5467 Email: cheebee@email.msn.com

Monte Benham Tri-Cities area representative and Co-Sponsor of Son of I-695 and The Traffic Improvement Initiative Phone/Fax: (509) 783-3829 Email: rmonteb@aol.com

-- Merciful Nate (mercifuln8@yahoo.com), March 15, 2000.


"Jack Fagan Spokane area representative and Co-Sponsor of Son of I- 695 and The Traffic Improvement Initiative Phone/Fax: (509) 467-5467 Email: cheebee@email.msn.com

Monte Benham Tri-Cities area representative and Co-Sponsor of Son of I-695 and The Traffic Improvement Initiative Phone/Fax: (509) 783- 3829 Email: rmonteb@aol.com " e-mailed them both. Keep up the good work, Monte and Jack!

zowie

-- (zowie@hotmail.com), March 15, 2000.


I dont think that saying "yes" to Cry-baby Tim would entail doing "A good job"

-- Merciful Nate (mercifuln8@yahoo.com), March 15, 2000.

Hey-

I am not paying the MVET and my agenda is getting more favorable attention in the legislature than it's EVER gotten before. I can live with two steps forward, one back. You keep stepping long enough, and you get to where you want to go. We now have the arrogant politicians and bureaucrats making compromises toward us, rather than the old what's mine is minee, what's yours is OURS approach that they took before this initiative. All at once, privatization is on the table, opening up HOV lanes is on the table, some degree of voter oversight in increasing taxes is on the table, and any return of the MVET is WAY OFF the table.

zowie

-- (zowie@hotmail.com), March 15, 2000.


Sick puppy Nate,

First off, I have no intention of calling, emailing, picketing or harrassing a Judge. Just because he ruled against an Initiative I support, does not mean I must be in the man's face. For you to assume that all I-695 supporters (or me in particular) would resort to such actions is absurd. Some of us actually know what we are doing. I know this scares you, but we will continue to fight the cause via pressure on the Elected officials and the initiative process. So much for your idiotic representative/direct democracy argument and mob rule theory that you have challenged me on. Sorry to disappoint you.

By the same token, I would not be picketing Tim Eymans home if he wrote an Initiative I disagreed with or enter into forum discussions trying to assasinate his character and calling him names. I would only challenge someone if they were actually present. I am not a coward.

I would, however, resort to treating you with contempt and call you names when you single me out in this forum making absurd assumptions. You sir, are ignorant.

-- Marsha (acorn_nut@hotmail.com), March 16, 2000.



Moderation questions? read the FAQ