Question for sysops about LL : LUSENET : TB2K spinoff uncensored : One Thread

As a matter of interest has Ladylogic been warned about her conduct, if not why not.

-- Sir Richard (, March 14, 2000


1) There's only one sysop here.

2) Why should she be warned about her conduct? This is an uncensored forum.

-- (hmm@hmm.hmm), March 14, 2000.

why was I warned about mine!

-- Sir richard (, March 14, 2000.

I haven't don't do anything wrong, richard. I don't even use another handle.

It's my trolls that imitate me that are acting crazy. The sysop knows who's me and who isn't, so there's no need for him/her to warn me.

(Hint. I'm the nice, "Ladylogic" posts. [Except with Anita sometimes.])

Have a good day, sir.


-- Laura (Ladylogic@...), March 14, 2000.

why was I warned about mine!

Where were you warned about your conduct, Richard?

-- (hmm@hmm.hmm), March 14, 2000.

got this email:

Richard, your trolling is getting out of hand.

Cool it buddy.


===== Old TB2K Forum Regular __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.

-- Sir richard (, March 14, 2000.

I thought LL was an arch-spammer, commander-spammer-in-chief, queen- spammer, big honcho-spammer, empress-spammer

how can I be that wrong

-- ricardo (, March 14, 2000.

I told you guys already yet. This is LL's board. Be grateful. You can say anything you please. If people don't like what you say, they will just ignore you. Ignore-ance hurts more than anything.

-- Very (, March 14, 2000.

yeah but somebody sent me that email (no return address), thought it was sysop police

-- rick (, March 14, 2000.

I thought OTRF had already told us that whole threads have been deleted that were started by a fake LL, and had in some cases several responses, and that the IP address was identical for both the original post and all the different responses. And NONE of them were LL's address, either.

The resemblance between such techniques and the "us against them, attack the enemy" orientation of several notorious posters among the censorites is uncanny.

-- Flint (, March 14, 2000.


This "Dick of the Dale" poster is the same guy who in one breath expresses his misogynistic opinions and in the next expresses his opinions on the low IQ on this forum.

-- Anita (notgiving@anymore.thingee), March 14, 2000.

All this being said, no one will deny that even the "nice" LL has been a notorious spammer, not only in the "old" TB forum, but even the uncensored Biffy and Debunkie forums. Even the "real" LL will not deny her childish tirades against Diane, calling her out for s spitwad/pea shooter fight, etc. As near as I can tell, the "real" and the "fake" and any other LadyLogics out there are just trolls.

I know we should let bygones be bygones, and I think it's good she got a new start here.

LadyLogic has gotten far more attention than she deserves. She has contributed nothing of value to this forum. She is a sick individual. If she had anything of value to say, she would straighten up, assume a new name, and start contributing.

-- Village Idiot (ladylogic@is.sick), March 14, 2000.

Flint, I'm not going to back and get the posts, but, if you've been reading all of the posts I'm in, you know that Old git is posting on this board. Obviously, Chuck is, and I think there's one other female sysop posting also .

However, OTFR is to moral and ethical to give me their ISP's, so I'll never know about the third one.

Clearly, they still have an "us against them" mentality.

(BTW, I'm not a sysop and this is not my board.)


-- Laura (Ladylogic@....), March 14, 2000.

To get back to the issue which started this thread, Richard, I'd say that the email you received was a fake. Obviously OTFR can verify if that's true or not.

-- (hmm@hmm.hmm), March 14, 2000.

"tirades against Diane, calling her out for s spitwad/pea shooter fight, etc."

HAHahahahahah hahahahahahaha hahahahahaha ha hahahahahahahah hahahahahahahahaha hahahahahah hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah hahahahahahhaahahhaha hahahahahahahahahahahahaha hahahah hahahaha hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahah ahaha hahaha hahahah ha

haha ha



I'm so tough!

You forgot my cyberbullets...


(By the way, your wrong, again. I never spammed anywhere except TB. But as an anon, it's obvious you feel it's Ok to lie about anything.)

(Oh, and keep this up please; I just love your attention.)


-- Laura (Ladylogic@...), March 14, 2000.

Richard, it is unfortunate that you thought you had no recourse to reply to my email, and resorted to post this here. But since you did, I'll clarify a few things and answer your questions here also. It might help others too.

1) I don't know how you have your email program setup, but usually with any program simply selecting the "reply" feature would automatically insert the original sender's address in the appropriate field. Look up under "options" or "preferences" in your program to see if this feature was enabled. Also, I'm not aware of any email program that doesn't show the sender's email address somewhere in the email you received. But again, look in your options/preferences to see if it was suppressed.

2) If you had read the "About" section on this forum, you would have found my email address, as well as my policy and reasons for this forum.

And now to answer your questions.

I have exchanged emails with Laura, but what was exchanged is no one's business but mine and hers.

Yes, Laura has spammed the classic TB2K forum with screen fulls of same threads for several days. Laura has explained her own reasons for doing this on other threads. I try hard not to judge and give my personal views and feelings as a sysop, and so I won't comment on this. I have explained my philosophy on another thread, the first day I opened this forum. In a nut shell; Everyone's past sins are forgiven and given a chance to start on a "clean slate". Without this philosophy, an uncensored forum would not be possible.

Perhaps you confuse "sysop police" with "thought police". The stated goals (in the About) and unstated goals for this forum is the free flowing, uncensored exchange of ideas, views and opinions. To misrepresent oneself as someone else, to "troll" and to spam are direct attacks against these goals, so therefore an attempt at disrupting this process. As a sysop, my job is to facilitate the goals stated for this forum.

Also, do not confuse troll posts with anonymous posts. There are, in my opinion, the legitimate reasons why some people would choose to post under a different name for different discussions, as long as those different names (and real or fake addresses) are not taken by someone else already. What differentiates a troll post from an anonymous one is the intent of the poster; is the poster's intent to take part of the discussion civily, or simply to attack and flame? The former would be legitimate, the latter would be deemed a "troll".

I hope this answers your questions and helps others as well.


-- Old TB2K Forum Regular (, March 14, 2000.

As I predicted, the "censorship" begins.

-- Shoe (on@other.foot), March 14, 2000.


Interesting. Where did you predict this? Have any of your other predictions failed to come true as well? I suspect most posts on this forum that consist of nothing but attacks on others, originate from those whose predictive abilities proved equally poor.

-- Flint (, March 14, 2000.

Shoe, in order to serve you better, would you please elaborate on your comment?

Where in my statements and actions do you see censorship? And what do you personally define as censorship?


-- Old TB2K Forum Regular (, March 14, 2000.

I have exchanged emails with Laura, but what was exchanged is no one's business but mine and hers.

Thank gawd OTBFR! You know, it always bothers me when someone posts another persons private email. Unlike posting to an open forum, private email should remain sacred. Hopefully, there will be laws in the future to protect email privacy.

Maybe there already are laws covering this--anybody know? I'm aware of employers rights to their company property (email), but I haven't heard of similar laws protecting individuals in their home.

Anyway, appreciate your straight forwardness OTBFR. I kind of knew that from the start, whoever you are. Your initial welcome came across as "one of us" who values freedom, and abhors intimidation.

-- (, March 14, 2000.


Good post! I abhor intimidation, too! Like when Laura started this thread posting a private email (with headers!) from someone. I agree, it is really slimey, isn't it? Especially since she posted a message, buried on another thread, that she had called cavscout at home and satisfied herself that he was not Manny.

This is really boring, but if any of you want to know who Manny/cavscout is....

Subj: leave me alone Date: 02/10/2000 11:21:00 PM US Mountain Standard Time From:


I have not posted anything to you anywhere since debunkies, so leave me alone.

Stop calling my house, and stop threatening me.

I'm serious. You are crossing a line here, and it is not a game anymore.

I have harassed you in the past, but have never threatened you.

Give it a rest.

----------------------- Headers -------------------------------- Return-Path: Received: from ( []) by (v67_b1.24) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 01:20:59 -0500 Received: from ( []) by (v67_b1.24) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2000 01:20:47 -0500 Received: from ( []) by (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA16830 for ; Thu, 10 Feb 2000 22:19:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 22:24:56 -0800 From: X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en]C-NECCK (Win95; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Subject: leave me alone Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-- laura (, March 05, 2000

-- (Hypocrites bum@me.out), March 14, 2000.

Oh, hell, admit it. Everyone's jumping back and forth and having a wonderful time. More personas posted across the boards than Faces of Eve.

Hope we can somehow keep on target, seems to be working. When one group gets to squirrely (and where is the Squirrel King?????!!!!)one of the other boards presents a perfectly stolid, acceptable face to distract lurkers and keep the information flow going.

-- another government hack (, March 14, 2000.

Moderation questions? read the FAQ