Lady Logic does not practice what she preaches.greenspun.com : LUSENET : TB2K spinoff uncensored : One Thread
Look at Ma kettle's post a few posts below and you will see that LL asks the question do we really need this person here? You all can kiss her ugly powdered smelly white butt. not only is she ugly she is calling for censorship. Whats up with that? has the ugly ass lady forgotten what this board is about?
-- Manny (No@dip.com), March 05, 2000
nit pick nit pick nit pick nit pick. How's that for UNcensored?
MOMMY HALP ME SOMEBODY IS NIT PICKIN MEEEEE
-- (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 05, 2000.
Laura and I have CERTAINLY shared "words" in the past. However, THIS forum is about a NEW beginning for EVERYONE. AFAIK, she can ask whatever questions she likes and be answered by those who choose...preferably IN the thread where the question was asked.
I understand that there are those who hate the concept of an unmoderated forum and want it to fail. Were those YOUR thoughts when you started a new thread to express what you could have expressed in the thread referenced?
-- Anita (email@example.com), March 05, 2000.
I fully agree with you. I'm ready to bury our past and start over.
-- laura (ladylogic@......), March 05, 2000.
It looked like she was making a joke to me. You know, Manny, humor?
-- (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 05, 2000.
Your're my kinda lady.
-- laura (lady@......), March 05, 2000.
ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! Posted by (184.108.40.206) Anita on January 30, 2000 at 19:29:30:
This always was Doc Paulie's forum. CPR was always the most prolific poster herein, and for a LONG, LONG time, he presented information that was useful...even information we couldn't get anywhere else. As I said elsewhere, I'm probably the newest "regular" here, having entered perhaps 7 or 8 months ago. I never liked CPR's "style" on the forum when I entered, and I mentioned it to him offline. He explained the reasoning behind his "pitbull" behavior and I even understood it to some extent.
A number of posters from other Y2k fora have come here recently. Some came strictly to disrupt, and they know who they are. Others came to engage in post-Y2k discussion, and some others came to simply point out how this forum has slid downhill.
Besides the new people who have come in to point out how this forum has declined, one of the old regulars returned to point out the same. I hadn't reviewed the threads under discussion because I KNEW they were "pissing contests." I DID spend the time today to review them, and I would have to agree with Patricia....WHERE ARE THE ADULTS AND PROFESSIONALS?
**(Anita is talking about LL in case you haven't figured it out)
Now we have a poster who's been banned from another forum emulating CPR's pitbull behavior....a self-professed newbie to Y2k and the internet. Where many here have been involved in Y2k for 4 years, this person thinks that 4 months of "research" gives one the right to turn this forum into an AOL teen chatroom. When a few adult professionals brought this fact to light, they were met with name-calling and threats of following or something. I didn't read this until the URL was sent to me. I'm quite capable of ignoring this person. However, I must wonder, What happened to the "pitbull"? Is it more important that old threads from a pig farmer get posted? Is it more important that old threads from TB2000 regarding an anonymous poster get rehashed in just about every thread on the forum?
Yesterday we saw a poster enter TB2000 expressing anti-Semitism. It was eventually deleted, but I thought the responses fitting. I'm not generally a "confrontational" type of person...definitely not a "pitbull" type of person. However, I DO recognize unacceptable behavior when I see it, and I know many others do also. What DO the regular posters want from this forum now that Y2k has come and gone? Do you want a rehash of what everyone said and DID before Y2k? Do you want an AOL fluff-ball insulting those who have contributed to debunking for up to 4 years? Do you want to remain silent while this forum slides FURTHER downhill? Doc asked what folks wanted in the form of redirection. I'm not sure what direction I'd like to see the forum take, but I'm DAMN sure of what direction I do NOT want it to take, and that's the direction it's headed in right now.
Re: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!
Posted by (220.127.116.11) Cherri on January 30, 2000 at 21:21:03:
In Reply to: ENOUGH IS ENOUGH! posted by Anita on January 30, 2000 at 19:29:30:
One of the things I appreciated about our forums was that our regulars never caused it to become degraded down to the level of other forums. There were a lot of people who disagreed with us and showed their asses in the way they posted on our forums, but overall we acted like the adults we are. I find it rather pathetic that LL actually thinks she can come here and "drive" the regular females off. In real life I can just picture her with her walking around the office, licking her lips and letting her shirt drop off of her shoulders just far enough to expose a little too much of her breast. If it were not so pathetic it would be funny. What she fails to realize is that not only are the women here secure in their knowledge and abilites, they are secure in their womanhood and are in no way threatened by some female who only knows how to act coy, flirt, and manipulate to get attention. As for the men, they are not pubescent males who loose their ability to think when they encounter a woman who shows herself off. They do appear to be rather dumstruck over her behavior, although that is understandable, seeing as how they are used to social intercourse with real women like us. It is all based on respect, respect for ourselves and respect for each other. Neither LL or anyone else can remove the respect we hold for each other, and the inappropriate behavior she displays does nothing but reflect badly on her. It is obvious that she is attempting to push our buttons and cause us to loose our tempers and "react" to her in her own manner, but that will not happen as we have no desire to lower ourselves down to her level. We are not the ones that will "go away".
-- archiver (email@example.com), March 05, 2000.
You're NOT introducing material that hasn't already been exposed to folks. You ARE trying to stir up trouble for a forum that has decided to establish a policy of "wiping the old slate clean."
This thought applies to your OTHER Manny post as well:
Give it up. EVERYONE [even Laura] has the right to start over here.
-- Anita (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 05, 2000.
Hmmm....whatever happened to freedom of speech Anita? Hmmmm?
-- archiver (Archiver@archiverrr.xcom), March 05, 2000.
History does repeat itself Anita, it's good to remember the past so we don't make the same mistakes in the future. Freedom of speech right?
-- archiver (email@example.com), March 05, 2000.
And one more thing, if you don't know the person (we're all anonymous), don't make the mistake of saying someone is someone when in fact your wrong. History is a good thing.
-- archiverrr (firstname.lastname@example.org), March 05, 2000.
I appreciate your support. (I'll pick myself up off the ground now.)
: o )
Please don't worry yourself about my troll, I don't. I don't let them get to me, so I'd like ask you and everyone else to ignore them too.
-- (Ladylogic@......), March 05, 2000.