They have their lists, we have ours.

greenspun.com : LUSENET : TimeBomb 2000 (Y2000) : One Thread

We know that govt agents are watching this and other boards. We know they many times push the party line. We are watching them. We know they are watching the average joe. The Feds are not the only ones making lists. We can trace IDS as well.

-- List Keeper (The@watcher.org), November 24, 1999

Answers

i seeeeeeeeee youuuuuuuuuuu....

-- King of Spain (madrid@aol.cum), November 24, 1999.

Jefferson--

"When the Government fears the people there is liberty. When the people fear the Government there is Tyranny".

"The Government that governs least governs best"

So now they can put Thomas Jefferson on their bogus list. (if true)

-- d----- (dciinc@aol.com), November 24, 1999.


Any Fed.org minions who are watching here are likely looking for people higher up on our side of the Y2K food chain. Small fry are not a big part of the issue unless they start making direct threats against people and property.

Conversely, your suggestion to monitor the Fed.org operatives is akin to trying to keep track of the small fry on their side of the Y2K issue. Instead what we need to keep track of is those higher level operatives who have not fulfilled their contract with the American people when it comes to providing leadership in the face of this crisis.

These higher level operatives are the politicians and buereaucrats who've abdicated their duties as servants of the people in exchange for the opportunity to accumulate personal power and/or wealth. These people will be made to pay for Y2K.

Be it getting turned out of office in the first election following an economic collapse (something akin to death for lifelong politicians). Perhaps facing "Nuremburg trials" for standing by while disaster arose to kill large numbers of the population. Or even facing mobs of angry survivors of a 9 or 10 level event intent on pitch fork or hanging rope "justice" for anyone remotely responsible for official decision making on Y2K issue.

The ones who need to be tracked aren't the guys and gals sitting in front of monitors, reading this post. It's the policy makers who made this mess worse than it needed be and then directed government employees to track "Internet Y2K troublemakers" whose crime is to be truly concerned aqbout the future of our nation and its population.

Keep an eye open for those higher-ups. When all's said and done, it might just be a bit harder to follow those folks to places like South America the way the Israelies had to chase the Nazis after WWII.

WW

-- Wildweasel (vtmldm@epix.net), November 24, 1999.


Okay. Okay. I'm not voting for Hillary.

-- Dave (aaa@aaa.com), November 24, 1999.

I'm makin' a list and checkin' it twice Want to see whose been naughty or nice

Yup, Willy you've been naughty

-- (SClaus@90deg.lattitude), November 24, 1999.



I believe it was the Lord High Executioner's song that said, in part, "I have a little list/they never will be missed!"

-- Mr. Mike (mikeabn@aol.com), November 24, 1999.

We're humiliated and ridiculed now. That's OK. It it's nothing, I get a life back. If it's bad, where will YOU be? Dork.

-- Sad Aussie (no@way.jose.net.au), November 24, 1999.

Politics is the "art of looking for trouble, finding it, misdiagnosing it and then misapplying the wrong remedies"

---- Groucho Marx

***They can put Groucho on the list too***

...(hitting the)...

-- snooze button (alarmclock_2000@yahoo.com), November 24, 1999.


Govt agents watching? Really? That's silly, possible I suppose, but just plain silly whether true or not.

List Keeper, as individuals I'm sure we are all terribly important in our own uniques ways, because that's what my ultra-liberal parents taught me. But as a group we don't amount to a hill of squat. We forum regulars could fit in a small gymnasium; lack a united goal or belief system; and (judging from numerous posts on finances) many members can hardly spare the few hundred bucks needed for a minimal food stash. Considering all that, (and I don't see how you could dispute any of it), I think you should revise your estimations on the likelihood of federal attention being paid to us. Even moreso, you should revise your opinion of whether it matters.

"Feds", if you're watching, I advise you to seek medical help - or at least cut down on caffeine.

-- Gus (y2kk@usa.net), November 24, 1999.


That's fascinating. A false-flag attack, from an non-english speaking poster. My bet is chinese, NK, or Iraq.

Like we need help stirring the pot around here. I wonder what a packet trace would reveal about THAT IP?

-- (intrigued@dot.com), November 24, 1999.



>Intrigued. With 39< days to go, it really doesn't matter. The ones of us that are prepared are waiting to see, the ones of us not preparing will find out it's too late to start.

-- Lobo (atthelair@yahoo.com), November 25, 1999.

Who teaches these pathetic spooks English anyway?

("Average Joe" hasn't been standard English slang for forty years. ;-) )

-- cgbg jr (cgbgjr@webtv.net), November 25, 1999.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ