Tourney 3 - Vote on how we're voting for games

greenspun.com : LUSENET : MAME Action Replay : One Thread

OK... read my motion dated November 21, and tell me wheater or not it's a good idea to use this voting style. This is a five day vote, and needs a majority to adopt. The voting ends November 28 at 1200 GMT.

I vote in the affirmative :)

-- Gameboy9 (goldengameboy@yahoo.com), November 23, 1999

Answers

I'll vote yea, as long as the random preference value is posted (see my suggestion after gbs) so games that get placed in the tournament because of taking an excluded games' place are in there because their random order value was higher than the other games.

-- Chad (churritz@cts.com), November 23, 1999.

I guess we'll also vote on the amendment to the motion presented by Chad - I'll vote in the affirmative on that one too. This is also a five day vote which ends November 28 at 1200 GMT.

Votes stands at:

3 - 0 for the motion(gamefreak voted in the affirmative)

2 - 0 for the amendment.

-- Gameboy9 (goldengameboy@yahoo.com), November 23, 1999.


I am sorry, but I most vote in the negative on both accounts. Here is the reason for such action...

Randomizing game selections takes the personality out of the competition. In T1, we all got to vote for the games, and the most popular ones made it in. With a random pick, all the fun is sucked out of it, making it nothing more than an exercise.

-- Chris Parsley (cparsley1@hotmail.com), November 23, 1999.


Moderation questions? read the FAQ