WASHINGTON  Computer networks used by government and business are increasingly at risk of severe disruption, and the federal government is not doing enough about the threat, congressional investigators said in a report to be made public Monday.

Security shortcomings jeopardize national defense, tax collection, law enforcement and air traffic control among other key operations, the non-partisan General Accounting Office said in a draft obtained by Reuters.

"At the federal level, these risks are not being adequately addressed,'' said the GAO, the investigative and audit arm of Congress. The report was prepared for Robert Bennett, the Utah Republican who heads the Senate Special Committee on the Year 2000 Technology Problem.

The number of security incidents handled by Carnegie Mellon University's CERT Coordination Center, a federally funded emergency response team, has risen from 1,334 in 1993 to 4,398 during the first half of this year, the report said.

Organized attacks such as one code-named "Solar Sunrise'' on Defense Department computers in February 1998, and computer viruses such as "Melissa'' early this year, highlight the government's susceptibility, the GAO said.

It cited "even greater concerns'' of some experts about private-sector systems that control energy, telecommunications, financial services, transportation and other vital services.

"Few reports are publicly available about the effectiveness of controls over privately controlled systems,'' GAO said. It added that private entities were "understandably reluctant'' to disclose vulnerabilities that might undercut customer confidence.

"Our nation's computer-based critical infrastructures are at increasing risk of severe disruption,'' it said, citing threats from hackers to terrorists to governments capable of computer-based "information warfare.''

CYBER ATTACK VULNERABILITY

Concern about U.S. vulnerability to cyber attack led the Clinton administration to launch an initiative called Presidential Decision Directive 63 in May 1998. The directive instructed U.S. agencies to develop cyber protection plans and establish links with industry groups.

But the GAO said no strategy for improving federal information security had been articulated clearly yet, nor had risks been prioritized.

In the absence of a coordinated, government-wide plan, the U.S. response to the threat may be "unfocused, inefficient and ineffective,'' wrote Jeffrey Steinhoff, the acting assistant comptroller general.

He said the Year 2000 technology challenge could be viewed as a major test of U.S. ability to protect computer-supported critical infrastructures.

Worldwide, hundreds of billions of dollars are estimated to have been spent to avoid havoc on Jan. 1, when ill-prepared computers could misread the last two zeros of the date as 1900 and shut down. The U.S. private sector alone is estimated to have spent $50 billion to fix the so-called Y2K glitch, according to Federal Reserve Board Chairman Alan Greenspan.

-- Dog Gone (layinglow@rollover.now), October 04, 1999

Answers

Here's the LINK

-- Dog Gone (layinglow@rollover.now), October 04, 1999.

Notice how the "cyber attack" idea is being blended with Y2k. Failures anticipated as a result of "hackers taking advantage" of Y2k, rather than as a result of greed, shortsightedness and mismanagement.

It's not just a euphemism, an indirect way of approaching the problem. They are really going to try to sell us the lie that we're being "attacked" when failures hit and bad data clogs the system in 2000. "Bureaucrats and overpaid corporate princes are not to blame - it's invisible hackers! We must have greater emergency powers to fight this terrorism!"

Sure, we're going to suffer "attack" due to Y2k, like a a sedentary person with a high-fat diet has a heart "attack." Only this heart attack victim is going to blame it on his family, go through their pockets, stop neighbors on the sidewalk and search them to make sure they're not about to "attack" his heart. Psychologists call it "projection." I call it creeping totalitarianism.

Liberty

-- Liberty (liberty@theready.now), October 04, 1999.

"Blended in" is exactly right, Liberty. WTSHTF, its ALL going to look like "cyber terrorism" to Uncle Sam. "Fortunately", always thinking ahead to prepare, there are numerous Presidential executive orders JUST READY to be executed to deal with this.

When things go to hell in a handbasket due to "cyber terrorism", just remember: "Its Y2K, Stupid!".

-- King of Spain (madrid@aol.cum), October 04, 1999.

Koskinen has already gone on record as stating that if there are any failures, it won't be the fault of the federal systems. You can be sure that it will be blamed on everyone EXCEPT the current administration.

-- Dog Gone (layinglow@rollover.now), October 04, 1999.

Doomers, Squirrels, Woodchucks, Drunk drivers, Terrorists, Hackers, Enemies everywhere!

THE CODE IS THE ENEMY

-- Ashton & Leska in Cascadia (allaha@earthlink.net), October 11, 1999.