I wrote a note to the campaign headquarters of Steve Forbes, asking for clarification regarding his specific views on sovereignty and one world government particularly. Three times I've found this note in my box:

(Alexandria, VA) - Charles Jarvis has resigned his position as Gary Bauer's National Campaign Chairman and today endorsed Steve Forbes for President.

In a memo to conservative leaders around the country, Mr. Jarvis - who previously served as Executive Vice President of Focus on the Family under the leadership of Dr. James Dobson and in the Reagan Administration - cited Mr. Forbes's strong pro-life views, economic experience and powerful performance in the Iowa Straw Poll as reasons for pro-family conservatives to now unite behind "the only conservative who can win."

FULL STORY: http://www.forbes2000.com/htmlPages/jarvismemo.html

Still not sure where he really stands. I'd like to think that there is one candidate out there who truly loves America and has the integrity and courage to fight to preserve this country. If there is, does he stand a chance of getting elected?

-- Mumsie (Shezdremn@aol.com), September 16, 1999

Answers

Pat Buchanan is the only candidate that has taken such a stance. He has spoken out against the new world order. Definitely along the isolationist lines. FWIW.

-- lparks (lparks@eurekanet.com), September 16, 1999.

Mumsie, thank you, and please keep us updated on Forbes' reply and your research. The big "catch" is, for any candidate who fits the description you give and those of us on this forum ACHE for in the White House, that he/she MUST have the support of a huge number of thinking/caring Americans to defeat the highly-sophisticated Other Side. And then the sad thought occurs to me, in the light of all of the assassinations in recent American history: will they let him/her live if he/she wins the election?

-- Elaine Seavey (Gods1sheep@aol.com), September 17, 1999.