Picked up a copy of the DAMN this morning. WoW, y2k on the frontpage...

It's actually a half way decent article. Points out no-one knows what is going to happen etc....

Article is at "http://www.dallasnews.com/metro/0725met100y2kprepare.htm"Damn article

What do y'all think...?

-- STFrancis (STFrancis@heaven.com), July 25, 1999

Answers

oooops,

should've been...

Damn article

-- STFrancis (STFrancis@heaven.com), July 25, 1999.

STF

I think if I were a newcommer to y2k and I read this article, I would do nothing - ho hum. It soulds like a bunch of PR people with smiley faces(except for the programmer guy). No real evidence set forth, no conclusions drawn, no offer of help, jusy a "sit back and relax" attitude, "we'll take care of it".

Why write such an article anyway. Better to reprint the CIA, GAO, Navy War College or even the recent Congressional hearings.

Dopes with opinions - thats all we get

Thanks for the post anyway,

Bob P

-- Bob P (rpilc99206@aol.com), July 25, 1999.

The headline says it all:

Y2K? No disaster, but no guarantees

Excuse me, but isn't "no disaster" a guarantee? What a bunch of morons.

-- Steve Heller (stheller@koyote.com), July 25, 1999.