------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------ More gun confiscation in California? State may take some firearms without compensation

------------------------------------------------------------------------

By Stephan Archer ) 1999 WorldNetDaily.com

While some California gun owners are turning in their illegal guns for cash, others may have to turn them in for nothing at all.

In a situation related to California's current buy back program in which the state is offering $230 to gun owners in exchange for their SKS "Sporter" rifles, owners of certain semiautomatics other than the SKS "Sporter" may have to give up their firearms without compensation to avoid facing criminal prosecution.

The same Roberti-Roos Assault Weapon Control Act of 1989 that created all the confusion with the various models of the SKS is now creating confusion again. This time, however, the debate won't just be over what gun should be confiscated. It will be concerning the registration deadline of the firearms mentioned in the Roberti-Roos law.

To lawfully possess one of the guns mentioned in the Roberti-Roos law, Californians must have purchased the weapon before June 1, 1989, according to Penal Code section 12280. To be fully compliant with state law, the gun owner must also have registered the gun with the California Department of Justice by March 30, 1992.

However, during the registration period, then Attorney General Dan Lungren extended the registration period giving gun owners more time.

"It was Lungren's staff's interpretation that there was no firm date when the registrations closed, and that's why they continued to do it," said Steve Helsley, a spokesperson for the National Rifle Association of America.

But then on Aug. 21, 1998, the Superior Court in San Francisco handed down a decision saying Lungren and his Justice Department had no discretionary authority to register assault weapons as identified in the Roberti-Roos law beyond the law's registration deadline.

Now, it is up to the current state attorney general, Bill Lockyer, to decide how best to handle this new court decision.

WorldNetDaily obtained a copy of a proposed letter designed to notify the estimated 1,550 assault weapons owners who were allowed to register after March 30, 1992. The letter, dated June 8, 1999, would have told the gun owners to turn in their registered weapons.

"You are advised to relinquish the assault weapon to a police or sheriff's department pursuant to California Penal Code section 12288 or render the weapon permanently inoperable," the letter said.

The letter also stated that the Justice Department would refund any registration fee paid when the gun was registered. However, nowhere in the letter did it mention any compensation for the firearm itself.

Regarding whether or not the letter had been sent out to anyone yet, Mike Broderick, assistant chief of the Bureau of Criminal Information and Analysis at the Justice Department, said, "There has been nothing released to anybody yet."

Broderick further stated the matter is still under litigation.

If the letters do go out, however, Helsley said the NRA will fight the decision in court.

"If Lockyer decides to start confiscating guns -- which is clearly what their plan is -- we're going to go to court immediately to stop it," said Helsley.

********************************************************************************************* California has always led the way in this country as far as trends go. Can the rest of the country be far behind?

-- (Minuteman@Concord.com), July 02, 1999

-- (Minuteman@Concord.com), July 02, 1999

Answers

Can the rest of the country be far behind?

It's just like boiling a frog.

Start him out in a pot of cold water over a low flame. He'll stay there until he's cooked.

-- Tom Beckner (tbeckner@erols.com), July 02, 1999.

That one will hit the Supreme Court. Bet on it.

-- Paul Davis (davisp1953@yahoo.com), July 02, 1999.

Just got my next shipment of 1000 rds .223 ammunition. Another 1000 rds LAP on order. I'll never register a gun, and will consider any attempt to seize them as THEFT. I do not tolerate theft well.

This is THE DEFINING EXAMPLE of why we MUST NEVER "register" guns. The Gestapo then knows which doors to send the Brownshirts to.

-- Dennis (djolson@pressenter.com), July 02, 1999.

Dennis, You are absolutely correct! Be sure you secure some of those firearms away so that you will have them after 90% of the sheeple turn theirs in.

In the meantime, I'm sending an email of encouragement to state attorney general, Bill Lockyer, and he will hopefully begin confiscation of weapons. That, along with the ongoing presidential debacle, the illegal foreign involvement, and other corruptions and examples of right-trampling might wake up a few more sheep. If not, die with your boots on.

Gunner

-- Tailgunner (tailgunner@hotmail.com), July 02, 1999.