Response to Possession Order

Thanks for all your advice. We went to court on September 10th, the original date of Aug 27 was a bank holiday! The judge was not impressed by First National's solictor who was an agent. She said that she could not possibly order an posession as First National had not provided a propoer schedule and therefore had not complied with the rules.This was raised as we pointed out there was an umployrent premium of some £3000 that we anted to canel, as when I rtreid to use I was told by FB I was not elegible as I had been self-employed. FB's solictor did not know if this premium was part of the arrears. To cut a long story short, teh judge adjourned the case to be repoened at the first open date after 6 weeks. The Friday before the court case my husband spoke to FB on the phone and came to an arrangement to pay £368 per month, this is £100 over the orginal payment. they then showed up incourt saying the wnated to repossess. What shoudl we do now. FB obviously are not messing. they also do not seem to have eny pof the correspndence that we snet to FB over the months teling them of my unemployment. Does anyone else have any experience of FB? Would love to remortgage with someonelse but who would have us?

[ Previous | Next ]