I used to sign everything "ch" in a deliberate attempt to become gender neutral, because in my younger years I percieved myself as a victim of constant male oppression - there may still be a tendency to feminist gut reactions I4m afraid (I4m trying to suppress it - honestly, I am!) If I should try to be realistic - and naturally I can only base this on my personal experience - I4d say that there IS a difference, and not just physical, between men and women. Some believe that this is purely a cultural heritage which can be overcome. I believe that it is genetic, and neccessary, and good. Crossovers do occur, and they are mostly very enjoyable as well as educational. I find that one of the most rewarding experiences, artistically as well as emotionally, is to successfully transcend my usual frame of mind and get a glimpse of what is happening inside somebody elses head, if only for a brief moment. But again, this may be down to "female empathy" :) I doubt if total neutrality is ever possible. When it comes to taking in a work of art, be it painting, sculpture or photography, I would estimate that only around 10 percent has universal appeal, and that is mostly the technical aspects (and even they can be debated). Each of us is heavily influenced, not only by our genetic and cultural heritage, but by the sum of our experiences until this moment when we look at this photo. Tom Lehrer says: "Life is like a sewer! What you get out of it, depends on what you put into it." One of my favourite quotes - it can be applied to anything :)(posted 8631 days ago)What I get out of this photo is probably based mostly on recognition. I recognize the awkwardness of being very young and over-dressed. A confusing mix of princess consciousness and uncertainty about having your adolescent body exposed by clothes that don4t provide the usual secure cover of loose-fitting t-shirts. As such I can relate very well. I would be interested in knowing the male perspective...