[ Post New Message | Post Reply to this One | Send Private Email to Avery B. Goodman | Help ]

Response to DSR-PD100

from Avery B. Goodman (ABGoodman@cwix.com)
I recently read an excellent article, reviewing all of the major digital cameras now available, including the Canon XL-1, and the Sony TRV-900, VX1000 and DSR PD-100, in DV Magazine. According to the magazine, they tested each of the cameras, using hi res monitors and determined the resolution of each, by performing electronic tests. Both the TRV900 and the DSR-PD-100 achieved the highest resolution, at 470 horizontal lines. The Canon XL-1 and Sony VX-1000 cameras, in contrast, were only able to achieve 460 horizontal lines. The DSR-PD-100 and TRV900 are both identical cameras. The primary difference is that the TRV900 records in the MiniDV format, whereas the PD-100 records in what is called "DVCAM" (considered a more professional format), although they both record on MiniDV tapes. This results in the total taping time dropping from 60 to 40 minutes, because DVCAM tape runs through the camera faster. It records the signal on more of the tape. As a result of the faster physical tape running rate, the DVCAM format results in fewer, or no frame "dropouts". In addition, the PD100 comes with a wide angle lens, built in, which will save you about $200.00, as well as a built in XLR adaptor (critical to the use of professional "balanced" audio equipment), which will save you another $150-$225.00, depending on the model of XLR adaptor you would, otherwise, be forced to buy for either the VX-1000 or the Canon XL-1.

In short, the PD-100 has a higher picture resolution than an XL-1, is more compact, and is cheaper. The only negative is the horrible Sony customer service department. Canon, on the other hand, has an excellent customer service department, which stands ready to answer any and all questions.

(posted 9146 days ago)

[ Previous | Next ]